Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2021 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1

Is it a Failure From Videothoracoscopy Convert to an Unexpected Thoracotomy in Interstitial Lung Disease Diagnosis?

İnterstisyel Akciğer Hastalıkları Tanısında Videotorakoskopiden Beklenmedik Torakotomiye Dönüş Başarısızlık mıdır?

Pages
48–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We think that careful patient selection in the preoperative period will reduce the probability of the thoracotomy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study is to evaluate the preoperative risk factors and compare the complications of patients who underwent diagnostic VATS for interstitial lung diseases in our clinic and patients who started thoracoscopic and converted to thoracotomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Patients who underwent VATS due to interstitial lung disease between January 2010 and December 2019 in our clinic were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We think that careful patient selection in the preoperative period will reduce the probability of the thoracotomy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study is to evaluate the preoperative risk factors and compare the complications of patients who underwent diagnostic VATS for interstitial lung diseases in our clinic and patients who started thoracoscopic and converted to thoracotomy. Methods: Patients who underwent VATS due to interstitial lung disease between January 2010 and December 2019 in our clinic were included in the study. In the study, patients were evaluated under 2 groups. There are 159 patients who underwent VATS wedge (Group-V) and 29 patients who started with VATS and converted to thoracotomy (Group-T) due to unexpected intraoperative complications. Results: There was no significant difference between VATS and thoracotomy groups in terms of demographic characteristics, except for a history of tuberculosis. The most common postoperative pathology was unusual interstitial pneumonia (n=56, 28%). Complications were observed in 17 patients (9%). Prolonged air leak in 5 patients, pneumothorax after postoperative drain removal in 3 patients, wound infection requiring revision in 3 patients, respiratory failure requiring non-invasive mechanical ventilation in 6 patients developed. Mortality occurred in 5 patients (2.7%) in the first 30 days postoperatively. Conversion from VATS to thoracotomy occurred due to a previous history of tuberculosis and widespread pleural adhesions. Conclusion: Although revealing in videothoracoscopic surgery is considered to be a failure, postoperative complication and mortality rates were found to be similar to VATS. The main risk factor for conversion to thoracotomy is tuberculous sequelae observed in preoperative thoracic CT and perioperative pleural diffuse adhesions. Therefore, VATS is a reliable and applicable method in interstitial lung disease (ILD). We think that careful patient selection in the preoperative period will reduce the probability of the thoracotomy.

Özet

Amaç: Bizim bu çalışmadaki amacımız, kliniğimizde interstisyel akciğer hastalıkları nedeniyle tanısal video yardımlı toraks cerrahisi (VATS) yapılan hastalar ile torakoskopik başlayıp torakotomiye dönülen hastaların preoperatif risk faktörlerinin değerlendirilmesi ve komplikasyonlarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Yöntemler: Kliniğimizde Ocak 2010 ile Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında, interstisyel akciğer hastalığı nedeniyle VATS yapılan hastalar çalışmaya alındı. Çalışmada hastalar 2 grup altında değerlendirilmiştir. VATS ile wedge (Grup-V) yapılan 159 hasta, VATS ile başlanıp intraoperatif beklenmedik komplikasyonlar nedeniyle torakotomiye dönülen (Grup-T) 29 hasta bulunmaktadır. Bulgular: VATS ve torakotomi grupları arasında tüberküloz öyküsü dışında demografik özellikler açısından anlamlı fark saptanmadı. Postoperatif en sık saptanan patoloji unusual interstisyel pnömoni (n=56, %28) idi. On yedi hastada (%9) komplikasyon izlendi. Beş hastada uzamış hava kaçağı, 3 hastada postoperatif dren çekilmesi sonrasında pnömotoraks, 3 hastada revizyon gerektiren yara yeri enfeksiyonu, 6 hastada non-invaziv mekanik ventilasyon ihtiyacı gerektiren solunum yetersizliği gelişmiştir. 5 hastada (%2,7) postoperatif ilk 30 günde mortalite meydana gelmiştir. VATS’dan torakotomiye dönüş, geçirilmiş tüberküloz öyküsü ve yaygın yapışıklıklar nedeniyle meydana geldi. Sonuç: Videotorakoskopik cerrahide açığa dönmek her ne kadar başarısızlık olarak düşünülse de, postoperatif komplikasyon ve mortalite oranları VATS ile benzer olarak saptanmıştır. Torakotomiye dönmedeki başlıca risk faktörleri preoperatif toraks BT’de izlenen tüberküloz sekelleri ve peroperatif saptanan plevral yaygın yapışıklıklar olarak saptandı. Bu nedenle interstisyel akciğer hastalıklarında (İAH), VATS güvenilir ve uygulanabilir bir yöntemdir. Preoperatif dönemde dikkatli hasta seçimi ile açığa dönme olasılığının azalacağı düşüncesindeyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞRU, M. V., SEZEN, C. B., AKER, C., ALP, A., METİN, M., ÖLÇMEN, A. (2021). Is it a Failure From Videothoracoscopy Convert to an Unexpected Thoracotomy in Interstitial Lung Disease Diagnosis?. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1, 48–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/267735

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Riley DJ, Costanzo EJ. Surgical biopsy: its appropriateness in diagnosing interstitial lung disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2006
  2. Sezen CB, Kocatürk Cİ. Videothoracoscopic lobectomy training in non-small cell lung cancer. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg 2019
  3. Nomori H, Ohtsuka T, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K. Difference in the impairment of vital capacity and 6-minute walking after a lobectomy performed by thoracoscopic surgery, an anterior limited thoracotomy, an anteroaxillary thoracotomy, and a posterolateral thoracotomy. Surg Today 2003
  4. Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, et al. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009
  5. Nakanishi R, Yamashita T, Oka S. Initial experience of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy with partial removal of the pulmonary artery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008
  6. Sezen CB, Bilen S, Kalafat CE, et al. Unexpected conversion to thoracotomy during thoracoscopic lobectomy: a single-center analysis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019
  7. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987
  8. Tong C, Li T, Huang C, et al. Risk Factors and Impact of Conversion to Thoracotomy From 20,565 Cases of Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2020
  9. Park JS, Kim HK, Choi YS, Kim J, Shim YM, Kim K. Unplanned conversion to thoracotomy during video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy does not compromise the surgical outcome. World J Surg 2011
  10. Coşgun T, Baysungur V, Tezel Ç, Okur E, Alpay L, Kutlu CA, et al. Learning and improvement process of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: experiences of Süreyyapaşa. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014
  11. Sezen CB, Kocatürk Cİ. Videothoracoscopic lobectomy training in non-small cell lung cancer. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg 2019
  12. Byun CS, Lee S, Kim DJ, et al. Analysis of Unexpected Conversion to Thoracotomy During Thoracoscopic Lobectomy in Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2015
  13. Jones RO, Casali G, Walker WS. Does failed video-assisted lobectomy for lung cancer prejudice immediate and long-term outcomes? Ann Thorac Surg 2008
  14. Mason AC, Krasna MJ, White CS. The role of radiologic imaging in diagnosing complications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Ches