Journals / Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 30

İNANÇLARIN VE DEMOGRAFİK DEĞİŞKENLERİN SINIF ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN YAZILI ANLATIM ÖĞRETİMİ UYGULAMALARINA ETKİSİ

Pages
213–230
Publication Date
2015-07-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of this study, teachers who hold beliefs congruent with the principles of constructivist epistemology and the principles of a balanced approach that adopt both constructivist and traditional orientation engage in constructivist-compatible writing practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of teachers’ beliefs about teaching writing, professional experiences, educational background, the number of students in their classrooms, and teacher gender on their self-reported constructivist writing practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were collected using a Teacher Beliefs and Practices of Writing Instruction Scale developed by the researcher from a sample of 159 elementary school teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of this study, teachers who hold beliefs congruent with the principles of constructivist epistemology and the principles of a balanced approach that adopt both constructivist and traditional orientation engage in constructivist-compatible writing practices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Öğretmen İnançları · Yazılı Anlatım · Sınıf Öğretmeni

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of teachers’ beliefs about teaching writing, professional experiences, educational background, the number of students in their classrooms, and teacher gender on their self-reported constructivist writing practices. The data were collected using a Teacher Beliefs and Practices of Writing Instruction Scale developed by the researcher from a sample of 159 elementary school teachers. The resulting demographic variables and beliefs and practices data analyzed using statistical analysis. According to the results of this study, teachers who hold beliefs congruent with the principles of constructivist epistemology and the principles of a balanced approach that adopt both constructivist and traditional orientation engage in constructivist-compatible writing practices. However, teachers who demonstrate a traditional teaching orientation do not employ constructivist-compatible writing practices. Professional experiences, educational background, the number of students in their classrooms, and the gender of teachers were found to have no significant effect on teachers’ teaching writing practices

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı ilköğretim birinci kademede öğretmenlik yapan öğretmenlerin yazılı anlatım öğretimi konusundaki inançlarının, mesleki deneyimlerinin, öğrenim durumlarının, sınıflarındaki öğrenci sayılarının ve cinsiyetlerinin yapılandırmacı yaklaşım felsefesine dayalı yazma öğretimi uygulamaları üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemektir. Bu çalışma için geliştirilen Yazma Öğretimi İnançları ve Pratikleri Ölçeği 159 öğretmene uygulanmış ve sonuçları istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre yapılandırmacı ve geleneksel yaklaşımların dengelendiği bir öğretim yaklaşımını savunan öğretmenler ile yalnızca yapılandırmacı yaklaşımı savunan öğretmenlerin yapılandırmacı yaklaşım odaklı uygulamalar yaptığı, geleneksel öğretim yaklaşımlarına inanan öğretmenlerin ise geleneksel öğretim uygulamaları yaptığı bulgulanmıştır. Ayrıca cinsiyet, öğrenci sayısı ve mesleki deneyimin yapılan uygulamalar üstünde anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Seban, D., Çakır, H. (2015). İNANÇLARIN VE DEMOGRAFİK DEĞİŞKENLERİN SINIF ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN YAZILI ANLATIM ÖĞRETİMİ UYGULAMALARINA ETKİSİ. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 30, 213–230. https://ajindex.com/articles/267087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Baumann, J., Hoffman, J., Moon, J. ve Duffy-Hester, A. (1998). Where are teachers' voices in the phonics/whole language debate? Results from a survey of U.S. elementary classroom teachers. The Reading Teacher, 51, 636-650.
  2. Barnyak, N. C. ve Paquette, K. R. (2010). An Investigation of Elementary Preservice Teachers' Reading Instructional Beliefs. Reading Improvement, 47(1), 7- 17. Bawden, R., Buike, S. ve Duffy, G.G. (1979). Teacher conceptions of reading and their influence on instruction (Research Series No. 47). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED174952). Brantlinger, E. (1996). Influence of pre-service teachers' beliefs about pupil achievement on attitudes toward inclusion. Teacher Education and Special Education, 19(1), 17- 33. Bridge, C. A., Hiebert, E. H. ve Chesky, J. (1983). Classroom writing practices. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), Searches for meaning in reading: Language processing and instruction. 32nd Yearbook of National Reading Conference (pp. 238- 242). Rochester NY: National Reading Conference. Brindley, R. (2000). Learning to walk to walk: Teacher educators' use of constructivist epistemology in their own practice. The Professional Educator, 22(2), 1-14.
  3. Brookhart, S. M., & Freeman, D. J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 37-60
  4. Burn, K., Hagger, H., Mutton, T. ve Everton, T. (2003). The complex development of student teachers' thinking. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9(4), 309-331.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2008). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı, 9. baskı, Ankara:
  6. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Byrd, C.M. (2008). Reading instruction beliefs and practices of early elementary school teachers. PSI CHI Journal of Undergraduate Research, 13 (2), 76- 85. Calderhead, J. ve Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice. Teacher and Teacher Education, 7(1), 1-8.
  7. Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17 (2) 5-12.
  8. Davis, M., Konapak, B. ve Readence, J. (1993). An investigation of two chapter one teachers' beliefs about reading and instructional practices. Reading Research and Instruction, 33, 105-188.
  9. DeFord, D. (1985). Validating the construct of theoretical orientation in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 351-367.
  10. Dreher, J. (19