Journals / Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18

ANTECEDENTS OF EMPLOYEES’ TRUST IN SUPERVISORS, MANAGEMENT, AND ORGANIZATIONS

ÇALIŞANIN BİR ÜST YÖNETİCİSİNE, YÖNETİME VE ORGANİZASYONA DUYDUĞU GÜVENİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ

Pages
323–359
Publication Date
2013-11-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that the antecedents can be classified into five distinct groups or factors: socio-psychological, managerial, common, organizational, and encompassing factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:he benefits of trust for organizations have been emphasized in the academic literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the beginning of the last decade, empirical research revealed that referents of trust are important.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that the antecedents can be classified into five distinct groups or factors: socio-psychological, managerial, common, organizational, and encompassing factors.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Trust · Employees’ trust in direct supervisors · Employees’ trust in management

Abstract

he benefits of trust for organizations have been emphasized in the academic literature. In the beginning of the last decade, empirical research revealed that referents of trust are important. Therefore, we investigated the empirical studies published in the same time period regarding the antecedents of the three referents of trust: direct supervisors, management, and organizations. The results indicate that the antecedents can be classified into five distinct groups or factors: socio-psychological, managerial, common, organizational, and encompassing factors. Accordingly, employees’ trust in management is affected by socio-psychological, managerial, and common factors, but not by organizational and encompassing factors. Managerial, common, and encompassing factors influence employees’ trust in direct supervisors. Employees’ trust in organizations is directly affected by common factors, organizational factors, and employees’ trust in their direct supervisors and is indirectly influenced by managerial factors, common factors, and encompassing factors through employees’ trust in their direct supervisors. Given these findings, we put forth a model of trust referents through mapping the antecedents with each particular trust referent that will guide future research efforts.

Özet

Güvenin organizasyonlar için önemi akademik literatürde vurgulanmaktadır. Geçen on yıllık dönemin başında, ampirik araştırmalar güven imlemlerinin (referents) önemli olduğunu gösterdi. Bundan dolayı, geçen on yıllık süre içerisinde yayınlanmış ampirik araştırmaları üç güven inleminin öncülleri açısından inceledik: bir üst yöneticiler, yönetim ve organizasyonlar. Sonuçlar, güven öncüllerinin beş farklı grupta veya faktörde toplanabileceğini göstermektedir: sosyopsikolojik, yönetimsel, ortak, örgütsel ve kuşatan faktörler. Buna göre, çalışanların yönetime güveni, sosyo-psikolojik, yönetimsel, ve ortak faktörler tarafından etkilenmekte, fakat örgütsel ve kuşatan faktörler tarafından etkilenmemektedir. Yönetimsel, ortak ve kuşatan faktörler, çalışanların bir üst yöneticilerine güvenini etkilemektedir. Çalışanların organizasyona güvenleri, ortak faktör, örgütsel faktörler ve çalışanların bir üst yöneticilerine güvenleri tarafından direk olarak, ve yönetimsel faktörler, ortak faktörler ve kuşatan faktörler tarafından çalışanların bir üst yöneticisine duyduğu güven aracılığı ile endirek olarak etkilenmektedir. Bu bulgulara dayanarak, gelecekte yapılacak araştırmalara rehberlik edecek bir güven imlemleri modelini, güven öncüllerini her bir belirli güven imlemi ile eşleştirmek suretiyle ortaya koymaktayız.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özyılmaz, A. (2013). ANTECEDENTS OF EMPLOYEES’ TRUST IN SUPERVISORS, MANAGEMENT, AND ORGANIZATIONS. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18, 323–359. https://ajindex.com/articles/266761

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1963). “Toward an Understanding of Inequity”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
  2. Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2003). “Organization Structure as a Moderator of the Relationship between Procedural Justice, Interactional Justice, and Perceived Organizational Support, and Supervisory Trust”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 295-305.
  3. Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2002). “Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 267-285.
  4. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Li, H. (2002). “When does Trust Matter? Antecedents and Contingent Effects of Supervisee Trust on Performance in Selling New Products in China and the United States”. Journal of Marketing, 66, 61-81.
  5. Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). “Meta-analysis of the Impact of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Attitudes, Behaviors, and Performance”. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22, 127-152.
  6. Bakker, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2008). “Positive Organizational Behavior: Engaged Employees in Flourishing Organizations”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 147-154.
  7. Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). “Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage”. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175-190.
  8. Bernerth, J. B., & Walker, H. J. (2009). “Propensity to Trust and the Impact on Social Exchange”. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15, 217-226.
  9. Bian, Y. (1994). Work and Inequity in Urban China. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  10. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). “Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness”. (Eds.: R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman) Research on Negotiations in Organizations: Connecticut, Greenwich: JAI Press Inc., pp. 43-55.
  11. Bijlsma, K. M., & Van de Bunt, G. G. (2003). “Antecedents of Trust in Managers: A “Bottom up” Approach”. Personnel Review, 32, 638-664.
  12. Bijlsma-Frankema, K., Jong, D. B., & Van de Bunt, G. (2008). “Heed, a Missing Link between Trust, Monitoring and Performance in Knowledge Intensive Teams”. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 19-40.
  13. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley. Brashear, T. G., Boles, J. S., Bellenger, D. N., & Brooks, C. M. (2003). “An Empirical Test of Trust-building Processes and Outcomes in Sales Manager-salesperson Relationships”. Journal of the Academy of Marketi