Journals / Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 31

TÜRKİYE’DE DEMOKRASİ, REEL GELİR VE DIŞA AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ UZUN DÖNEMLİ VE NEDENSEL İLİŞKİLER

Pages
358–370
Publication Date
2015-10-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to results: i) Economic growth effects positively the growth rate of democracy both short-run and long-run. ii) The growth rate of trade openness effects negatively the growth rate of democracy in the long-run. iii) There is strong and long-run causality from economic growth and growth rate of trade openness to the growth rate of democracy. iv) There is long-run causality from the growth rates of democracy and trade openness to economic growth. v) There is short-run causality from the growth rate of democracy to the growth rate of trade openness

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explores to the long-run and causal relationships between democracy, real income and trade openness in Turkey for 1984-2012 period by using time series methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study employs ADF unit root test for stationarity analysis; ARDL bound test approach to test cointegration relationships and finally Granger causality test to determine the causal relationships between variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to results: i) Economic growth effects positively the growth rate of democracy both short-run and long-run. ii) The growth rate of trade openness effects negatively the growth rate of democracy in the long-run. iii) There is strong and long-run causality from economic growth and growth rate of trade openness to the growth rate of democracy. iv) There is long-run causality from the growth rates of democracy and trade openness to economic growth. v) There is short-run causality from the growth rate of democracy to the growth rate of trade openness
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study explores to the long-run and causal relationships between democracy, real income and trade openness in Turkey for 1984-2012 period by using time series methods. This study employs ADF unit root test for stationarity analysis; ARDL bound test approach to test cointegration relationships and finally Granger causality test to determine the causal relationships between variables. According to results: i) Economic growth effects positively the growth rate of democracy both short-run and long-run. ii) The growth rate of trade openness effects negatively the growth rate of democracy in the long-run. iii) There is strong and long-run causality from economic growth and growth rate of trade openness to the growth rate of democracy. iv) There is long-run causality from the growth rates of democracy and trade openness to economic growth. v) There is short-run causality from the growth rate of democracy to the growth rate of trade openness

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de demokrasi, reel gelir ve dışa açıklık arasındaki uzun dönemli ve nedensel ilişkileri Türkiye ekonomisi için 1984-2012 dönemi verileri ile araştırmaktadır. Değişkenlerin durağanlık analizi için ADF birim kök testi, eşbütünleşme ilişkisini test etmek için ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı ve değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkilerinin belirlenmesinde Granger nedensellik testi modeli kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar: i) Ekonomik büyüme, kısa ve uzun dönemde demokrasiyi olumlu etkilemektedir. ii) Dışa açıklık oranındaki artışlar ise, uzun dönemde ise demokrasiyi olumsuz etkilemektedir. iii) Ekonomik büyüme ve dışa açıklık artış hızı değişkeninden, demokrasi gelişme hızı değişkenine doğru, uzun dönemli Granger nedensellik ve güçlü Granger nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmaktadır. iv) Dışa açıklık artış hızı ve demokrasi gelişme hızı değişkeninden, ekonomik büyümeye doğru uzun dönemli Granger nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmaktadır. v) Demokrasi gelişme hızı değişkeninden, dışa açıklık artış hızı değişkenine doğru kısa dönemli Granger nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACARAVCI, A., ERDOĞAN, S. (2015). TÜRKİYE’DE DEMOKRASİ, REEL GELİR VE DIŞA AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ UZUN DÖNEMLİ VE NEDENSEL İLİŞKİLER. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 31, 358–370. https://ajindex.com/articles/266619

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Acaravcı, A. (2010). The Causal Relationship between Electricity Consumption and GDP in Turkey: Evidence from ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Economic Research. 23 (2): 34-43.
  2. Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2000). The Relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian Developing Countries. Energy Economics 22, 615–625.
  3. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. ve Alse, J. (1993), “Export Growth and Economic Growth: An Application of Cointegration and Error-Correction Modelling”, The Journal of Developing Areas, p.535-542.
  4. Barro, R. J. (1999).
  5. Inequality, Growth and Investment. NBER Working Paper Series Paper No: 7038. Brown, R.L., Durbin J. ve Evans, J.M. (1975). Techniques for Testing the Consistency of Regression Relations over Time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 37: 149-192.
  6. De Haan, J. Siermann, Clements J.R. (1995). New evidence on the relationship between democracy and economic growth. Public Choice, 86:175-198.
  7. Firdmuc, J. (2001).
  8. Economic Reform, Democracy, and Growth During Post-comunnist Transition. Center for European Integration Studies Working Paper No: 372. Fukuyama, F. (2011). Tarihin Sonu ve Son İnsan. İstanbul:
  9. Profil Yayıncılık. Gupta, D.K., Madhavan, M. C., Blee, A. (1998).Democracy, Economic Growth and Political Instability: An Integrated Perspective. Journal of Socio-Economics. 27(5): 587-611.
  10. Hatanaka, M. (1996). Time-Series-Based Econometrics: Unit Roots and Cointegration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. - Lee, C.C. ve Chang, C.P. (2008). Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: a more comprehensive analysis using panel data, Resource and Energy Economics 30(1): 50–65.
  11. Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requsities of democracy: Economic development and political development. American Political Science Review. 53: 69-105.
  12. Masih, A.M.M. ve Masih, R., (1996). Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modeling techniques. Energy Economics 18, 165–183.
  13. Oyan, O (1999). 1980 sonrası neo-liberal politikaların değerlendirilmesi, I. Yeni birikim modelinin dönüm noktaları. Türk-İş Yıllığı 1999, Cilt 1, 23-36.
  14. Narayan, P.K. (2005). The Saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration Tests. Applied Economics. 37: 1979-1990.
  15. Pesaran, H.M. ve Shin, Y. (1999). Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis, in Storm, S. (ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in