SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 34

INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CRITICAL THINKING DISPOSITION, GENERAL SELF-EFFICACY AND HOPELESSNESS

ELEŞTİREL DÜŞÜNME EĞİLİMİ, GENEL ÖZ YETERLİK VE UMUTSUZLUK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Fatih KEZER
Üzeyir OĞURLU
Osman Nejat AKFIRAT
Pages
202–218
Publication Date
2016-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that mean of general self efficacy can be considered as high; hopelessness level was low and critical thinking disposition was moderate among university students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study aims to investigate the relation critical thinking dispositions, general selfefficacy and hopelessness level among university students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data was obtained from 203 (157 girls; 51 boys) university students who were attending to Education Faculty.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that mean of general self efficacy can be considered as high; hopelessness level was low and critical thinking disposition was moderate among university students.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hopelessness · General Self-Efficacy · Critical Thinking Dispositions

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the relation critical thinking dispositions, general selfefficacy and hopelessness level among university students. The study was a relational descriptive study using survey model. The data was obtained from 203 (157 girls; 51 boys) university students who were attending to Education Faculty. In the research, California Critical Thinking Disposition Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale and Beck Hopelessness Scale were used to collect data. The results showed that mean of general self efficacy can be considered as high; hopelessness level was low and critical thinking disposition was moderate among university students. In addition, there was a negative correlation between hopelessness level and critical thinking and self-efficacy but o positive relationship between critical thinking tendency and self-efficacy. The results also revealed that level of hopelessness and level of general self-efficacy predicted critical thinking dispositions separately and together.

Özet

Bu araştırmada üniversite öğrencilerinin eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri ile genel öz yeterlik ve umutsuzluk düzeyi arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Araştırma, ilişkisel tarama modelindedir. Veriler, Eğitim Fakültesi’nde öğrenim gören 208 (157 kadın, 51 erkek) öğrenciden toplanmıştır. Araştırmada, Genel Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği, Beck Umutsuzluk Ölçeği ve California Eleştirel düşünme ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucuna göre öğrencilerin genel öz yeterlik puan ortalamasının yüksek olduğu, umutsuzluk düzeylerinin düşük ve eleştirel düşünme düzeylerinin orta düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, umutsuzluk puanları arttıkça eleştirel düşünme eğilimi ve genel öz yeterik puanlarının düştüğünü fakat eleştirel düşünme puanları arttıkça genel öz yeterik puanlarının da aynı yönde arttığı görülmüştür. Araştırma sonucuna göre hem umutsuzluk hem de genel öz yeterlik düzeyinin eleştirel düşünme eğilimini hem ayrı ayrı hem de birlikte yordadığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

KEZER, F., OĞURLU, Ü., AKFIRAT, O. N. (2016). INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CRITICAL THINKING DISPOSITION, GENERAL SELF-EFFICACY AND HOPELESSNESS. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 34, 202–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/266607

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abela, J.R. Z. ve Seligman, M. E.P. (2000).The hopelessness theory of depression: A test of the diathesis-stress component in the inter-personal and achievement domains. Cognitive Therapy and Research,24 (4), 361-378.
  2. Arend, B. (2009). Encouraging critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The Journal of Educators Online, 6 (1), 1-23.
  3. Artino J. R., Anthony.R. ve Stephens, J., M. (2009). Academic motivation and self regulation:A comparative analysis of undergraduateand graduate students learning online. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 33(2), 78-87.
  4. Aslan, C. (2013). Özel eğitim okullarında çalışan öğretmenlerin umutsuzluk düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. International Journal of Social Science, 6 (7), 121-132.
  5. Aypay, A. (2010). Genel öz yeterlik ölçeği'nin (Göyö) Türkçe'ye uyarlama çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (2), 113-131.
  6. Bandura A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
  7. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191-215.
  8. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37 (2), 122-147.
  9. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bandura, A. (2005). The primacy of self-regulation in health promotion.Applıed Psychology: An Internatıonal Revıew,54(2), 245-254.
  10. Bandura, A. (2007). Self-efficacy. http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/BanEncy.html (Erişim Tarihi: 10.08.2015).
  11. Bandura, A. ve Lock, E., A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87-99.
  12. Bandura, A.,(1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
  13. Beck, AT., Weissman, A., Lester D. ve Trexler, L. (1974). The measurement of pessimism. The hopelessness scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 (6), 861-865.
  14. Bolland, J., Bryant, C., Lian, B., McCallum, D., Vazsonyi, A. ve Barth, J. (2007). Development and risk behavior among African American, Caucasian, and mixed-race adolescents living in high poverty inner-city neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40, 230-249.
  15. Branch, B. J. (2000). The relationship among critical thinking, clinical decision-making and clinical practice: A comparative stud