Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 20

SOCIAL APPEARENCES OF BEING AN OFFENDER: SOCIAL EXCLUSION, STIGMA AND CRIME

"HÜKÜMLÜ” OLMANIN SOSYAL TEZAHÜRLERİ: SOSYAL DIŞLANMA, DAMGA VE SUÇ - SOCIAL APPEARENCES OF BEING AN OFFENDER: SOCIAL EXCLUSION, STIGMA AND CRIME

Pages
138–157
Publication Date
2017-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study, in this context, based on the arguments over these concepts, seeks to argue, by means of the results of the survey conducted with the people under probation, how being an offender influences his/her relations of family and social; what fundamental problems the individual as an offender.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to argue and focus on the social exclusion experiences and obstacles of individuals who have rejoined the society after juridical processes and are being labelled as “criminal” or “convicted”.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Being offender may result in a sharp break in both private and social life of an individuals, bringing into question the reconstitution of some processes such as socialization and social integration in terms of both society and individual.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study, in this context, based on the arguments over these concepts, seeks to argue, by means of the results of the survey conducted with the people under probation, how being an offender influences his/her relations of family and social; what fundamental problems the individual as an offender.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Dışlanma · Suç · Ceza

Abstract

This study aims to argue and focus on the social exclusion experiences and obstacles of individuals who have rejoined the society after juridical processes and are being labelled as “criminal” or “convicted”. Being offender may result in a sharp break in both private and social life of an individuals, bringing into question the reconstitution of some processes such as socialization and social integration in terms of both society and individual. This situation involves, along with the processes of exclusion, labelling, othering, also the loss of the social-cultural and economic life of the individual and as well as the reconstruction of it. When it comes to social deviance and crime, processes such as social exclusion, social isolation and labelling, which lead to disintegration, occur as prominent issues. This study, in this context, based on the arguments over these concepts, seeks to argue, by means of the results of the survey conducted with the people under probation, how being an offender influences his/her relations of family and social; what fundamental problems the individual as an offender.

Özet

Bu çalışma; bir suç işledikten sonraki hukuksal süreçler aşamasında yeniden topluma katılan ve “suçlu” veya “hükümlü” olarak etiketlenen bireylerin gündelik yaşam içinde karşılaştığı sorunlar ve sosyal dışlanma deneyimi üzerine bir tartışma yürütmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Hükümlü olmak, başlı başına birey ve toplum açısından sosyal uyum ve sosyal bütünleşme gibi süreçleri yeniden kurmayı ve sorgulamayı gündeme getirerek, bireyin hem özel yaşamında, hem de sosyal yaşamında keskin kopuşlar yaşamasına neden olabilmektedir. Bu durum; dışlanma, damgalanma, ötekileştirilme gibi süreçlerin yanında, bireyin sahip olduğu sosyo-kültürel ve ekonomik yaşamın bütünüyle yitirilmesini ve ceza sonrası yeniden inşa edilmesini de içermektedir. Çünkü toplumsal sapma ve suç söz konusu olduğunda, en önemli sorunların başında toplumsal soyutlanma, dışarda bırakılma, sosyal dışlanma ve damgalama gibi ayrışmaya neden olacak durumlar gelmektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışma; özellikle bu kavramlar üzerinden yürütülen tartışmalardan yola çıkarak, mahkûmiyet durumunun toplumsal ilişkilere nasıl yansıdığını, aile yaşamının nasıl etkilendiğini, bireyin bu süreçte yaşadığı temel sorunların neler olduğunu, yüz yüze yapılan anket çalışmasından elde edilen verilerin sonuçları üzerinden tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma söz konusu bu süreçleri “denetimli serbestlik” örneği üzerinden irdelemeyi hedeflemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİMURTURKAN, M., DEMEZ, G., KART, E., ERTAN, C., CANKURTARAN, S., AKTİN, S. (2017). SOCIAL APPEARENCES OF BEING AN OFFENDER: SOCIAL EXCLUSION, STIGMA AND CRIME. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 20, 138–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/266295

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Atkinson T., (1998) “Chapter One: Social Exclusion, Poverty and Unemployment”, Exclusion, Employment and Opportunity, Atkinson A.B., Hill J., (Edt.) Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics (CASE), No: 4, London. Bancroft A., Wilson, S., Burley C., Cunningham-Burley S., Backett Milburn K., Masters H., (2004) Parental Drug and Alcohol Misuse: Resilience and Transition Among Young People, York Publishing, Edinburgh. Becker, H. S., (2013) Hariciler (Outsiders) - Bir Sapkınlık Sosyolojisi Çalışması, Çev. Ünsaldı, L., Geniş, Ş. İstanbul:
  2. Heretik Yayınları.
  3. Bengtsson, T. T., (2016) “Performing Hypermasculinity: Experiences with Confined Young Offenders”, Men and Masculinities, 19, (4), pp. 410-428.
  4. De Haan, A. (2000), Social exclusion: Enriching the Understanding of Deprivation, Studies in Social and Political Thought, 2(2), pp. 22-40.
  5. Department of Human Services, Victoria, Australia. (2000) “What is stigma”.[Online]. Available: http://hna.ffh.vic.gov.au/acmh/mh/mental_illness/stigma.htm.
  6. Dood T., Hunter P., (1992)
  7. The National Prison Survey, HMSO, London. Durkheim, E., (1960) The Division of Labour in Society (1863), Free Press,
  8. New York. Durkheim, E., (1995)
  9. Toplumbilimsel Yöntemin Kuralları, Çev. Akal, C. B., Engin Yayıncılık, İstanbul. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction report (2008), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Gray P., (2005) “The Politics of Risk and Young Offenders Expreiences of Social Exlusion and Restorative Justice”, British Journal of Criminology, 45 (6), pp. 938-957
  10. Goffman, E., (1961) Asylums: Essays On The Social Situation Of Mental Patients And Other İnmates, NY: Anchor Books, Garden City Goffman, E., (1963)
  11. Stigma, Penguin, London. (Goffman, E., (2014)
  12. Damga, Yay. Haz. Levent Ünsaldı, Heretik Yayınları, Ankara). Hale C. (2013) “Economic Marginalization, Social Exlusion and Crime”, Criminology, Hale C., Hayward K., Wahidin A., Wincup E.,(Edt.), Oxford University Press,
  13. Oxford. Hale, C., Fitz, M. G., (2007) "Social Exclusion and Crime", Multidisciplinary Handbook of Social Exclusion Research, Abrams, D., Christian, J., Gordon, D., (Edt.), John Wiley & Sons., West Sussex, pp.137-158.
  14. Harding, D. J., (2003) “Jean Valjean’s Dilemma: The Management of Exconvict Identity in the Search for Employment”, Deviant Behavior, 24, pp.571–95.
  15. Kirkwood S., McNeill F., (2015) “Integration and reintegration: Comparing Pathways to Citizenship Through Asylum and Criminal