SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Life Economics / 2014 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Demand-Oriented Approach For Transportation: Travel Demand Management

Ulaşımda Talep Odaklı Yaklaşım: Yolculuk Talep Yönetimi

Burak KOZALI
Pages
57–68
Publication Date
2014-07-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionaly, travel demand management is not cure all for solving whole transportation problems and traffic congestion but it is a strategic planning as mightliy effective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Population and number of vehicle growth has increased in urban transport problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Transportation problems cause to be high costs with respect to economic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionaly, travel demand management is not cure all for solving whole transportation problems and traffic congestion but it is a strategic planning as mightliy effective.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yolculuk Talep Yönetimi · Trafik Tıkanıklığı · Ulaşım

Abstract

Population and number of vehicle growth has increased in urban transport problems. Transportation problems cause to be high costs with respect to economic. Travel demand management aims to solve for transportation problems and traffic congestion by reducing and restricting travel demand instead of increasing the transportation facilities. Travel demand management usually purposes to change travel habits by avoidance of costly investment about transportation problems and traffic congestion. Additionaly, travel demand management is not cure all for solving whole transportation problems and traffic congestion but it is a strategic planning as mightliy effective.

Özet

Nüfus artışı ve taşıt miktarındaki artış kentiçi ulaşım problemlerini de artırmıştır. Ulaşım ile ilgili problemler ekonomik açıdan yüksek maliyetlere neden olmaktadır. Yolculuk talep yönetimi, ulaşım problemleri ve trafik tıkanıklığını ulaşım ile ilgili imkanları artırmadan yolculuk talebini azaltarak ve kısıtlayarak çözmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yolculuk talep yönetimi ulaşım sorunlarını ve trafik tıkanıklığını çözmede genellikle pahalı yatırımlar yapmaktan kaçınarak yolculuk alışkanlıklarının değiştirilmesini hedeflemektedir. Buna ek olarak yolculuk talep yönetimi, bütün ulaşım problemlerini ve trafik tıkanıklığını gidermede her derde deva olamasa da oldukça etkili bir stratejik planlamadır

🔖

Cite This Article

KOZALI, B. (2014). Demand-Oriented Approach For Transportation: Travel Demand Management. Journal of Life Economics, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 57–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/2648

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. ABRAHAMSE, W. and KEALL, M., 2012, Effectivenes of a Web-Based Intervention to Encourage Carpooling to Work: A case Study of Wellington, New Zealand, Transport Policy, 21, 45-51.
  2. AGATZ, N. A. H., ERERA A. L., SAVELSBERG, M. W. P. and Wang, X., 2011, Dynamaic Ride-Sharing: A Simulation Study in Metro Atlanta, Transportation Research Part B, 45,1450-1464.
  3. ALBATE, D. and BEL, G., 2009, What Local Policy Makers Should Know About Urban Road Charging: Lessons From Worldwide Experience, Public Administration Review, September-October, 962-975.
  4. ANAS, A. and LINDSEY, R., 2011, “Reducing Urban Transportation Externalities: Road Pricing in Theory and in Practice”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5 (1). 66-88.
  5. BENKO, M. and SMITH, L., 2008, Congestion Pricing: What Is It?, Community Transportation, 26 (2), 16-19.
  6. BHATT, K. and HIGGINS, T., 2008, KTA: Lessons Learned from International Experience in Congestion Pricing Final Report, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Maryland, August. CERVERO, R., 1996, Mixed Land-Uses and Commuting: Evidence From The American Housing Survey, Transportation Research A, 30 (5), 361-377.
  7. CORREIA, G. and VIEGAS, J. M., 2011, Carpooling and Carpool Clubs: Clarifying Conceptes and Assessing Value Enhancment Possibilities Through a Stated Preference Web Survey in Lisbon, Portagual”, Transportation Research Part A, 45, 81-90.
  8. DANWEN, B, WEI, D. and SHIHUI, G., 2010, Impact of Parking Rates on Residebt Travel Behavior, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 10 (3), 80-85.
  9. DECORLA-SOUZA, P. and WHITEHEAD, R. E., 2003, The Value Of Pricing The Use Of Roads, Public Works Management & Policiy, 7, 267-276.
  10. ELIASSON, J., 2008, Lessons From The Stockholm Congestion Charging Trial, Transport Policy, 15, 395-404.
  11. ELKER, C., 2002,
  12. Ulaşımda Politika Ve Pratik, Gölge Ofset, Ankara, ISBN 975-97812-0-4.
  13. FERGUSON, E., 1990, Transportation Demand Management Planning, Development, and Implementation, Journal of The American Planning Association, 56 (4), 442-456.
  14. FERGUSON, E., 1997, The Rise and Fall of The American Carpool: 1970-1990, Transportation, 24, 349-376.
  15. GARLING, T. and SCHUİTEMA, G., 2007, Travel Demand Management Targeting Reduced Private Car Use: Effectiveness, Public Acceptability and Political Feasibility, Journal of Social Issues, 63 (1), 139-153.
  16. GIULIANO, G. and WACHS, M., 1991, Responding to Congestion and Traffic Growth: Transportation Demand Management [online],