Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

THE EUROPEAN NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY: EUROPEAN UNION’S FOREIGN TRADE RELATIONSHIP WITH NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES

AVRUPA KOMŞULUK POLİTİKASI: AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NİN KOMŞU ÜLKELER İLE DIŞ TİCARET İLİŞKİSİ

Pages
334–350
Publication Date
2019-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, within the scope of foreign trade relations with the EU, it was found that Egypt’s exports and Tunisia’s and Morocco’s imports did not converge; however, other countries’ exports and imports converged.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to analyze the foreign trade relations between the European Union (EU) and the neighboring countries by means of convergence hypothesis using time series method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Tests used in the analysis are ADF, PP, KPSS, NG-Perron and structured fractured Lee-Strazicich.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, within the scope of foreign trade relations with the EU, it was found that Egypt’s exports and Tunisia’s and Morocco’s imports did not converge; however, other countries’ exports and imports converged.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Avrupa Birliği · Avrupa Komşuluk Politikası · Dış Ticaret

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to analyze the foreign trade relations between the European Union (EU) and the neighboring countries by means of convergence hypothesis using time series method. Tests used in the analysis are ADF, PP, KPSS, NG-Perron and structured fractured Lee-Strazicich. Within the scope of the study, the countries which took part are the ones where the action plans of the European Neighborhood Policy have been made. These countries are Azerbaijan, Armenia, Morocco, Georgia, Israel, Lebanon, Egypt, Moldova, Tunisia, Ukraine and Jordan. As a result of the analysis, within the scope of foreign trade relations with the EU, it was found that Egypt’s exports and Tunisia’s and Morocco’s imports did not converge; however, other countries’ exports and imports converged.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Avrupa Birliği (AB) ile komşu ülkeler arasındaki dış ticaret ilişkileri, zaman serisi yöntemi kullanılarak yakınsama hipotezi ile analiz edilmiştir. Analizde kullanılan testler; ADF, PP, KPSS, NG-Perron ve yapısal kırılmalı Lee-Strazicich’dir. Çalışma kapsamında; Avrupa Komşuluk Politikası’nın eylem planlarının yapıldığı ülkeler yer almıştır. Bu ülkeler; Azerbaycan, Ermenistan, Fas, Gürcistan, İsrail, Lübnan, Mısır, Moldova, Tunus, Ukrayna ve Ürdün’dür. Analiz sonucunda; AB ile olan dış ticaret ilişkileri kapsamında Mısır’ın ihracatında ve Tunus ile Fas’ın ithalatında yakınsamanın gerçekleşmediği; bununla beraber, diğer ülkelerin ihracatında ve ithalatında yakınsamanın gerçekleştiği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGAN, E. E. (2019). THE EUROPEAN NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY: EUROPEAN UNION’S FOREIGN TRADE RELATIONSHIP WITH NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 334–350. https://ajindex.com/articles/26464

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Abramovitz, M. (1986) “Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind”, The Journal of Economic History, 46 (2): 385-406.Akıncı, M., Yılmaz, Ö. (2012) “Türkiye ile AB arasındaki Kişi Başına Gelir Yakınsaması: Farklardaki Fark Analizi”, Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 49 ( 567): 15-26.Atalay, S.S. (2007) “Yeni Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinde ve Türkiye’de Reel Yakınsama”, Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası Dış İlişkiler Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 1-91.Barro, R. J. ve Xavier S. M. (1992) “Convergence”, Journal of Political Economy, 100 (2): 223-251.Baumol, W. J. (1986) “Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show”, The American Economic Review, 76 (5): 1072-1085.Bernard, A. Ve Durlauf, S. (1995) “Convergence in International Output”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10 (2): 97-108.Carlino, G., Mills, L. (1993) “Are U.S Regional Incomes Converging?: A time series analysis”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32 (2): 335-346.Ceylan, R. (2010) “Yakınsama Hipotezi: Teorik Tartışmalar”, Sosyoekonomi, 11 (11): 48-60.Cellini, R., Scorcu, A. (2000) “Segmented stochastic convergence across the G-7 countries”, Empirical Economics, Springer, 25(3): 463-474.Ceylan, R. (2009) “Ekonomik Büyüme ve Yakınsama Süreci”, Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  2. Ankara.
  3. Cunado, J. (2011): “Structural Breaks and Real Convergence in Opec Countries”, Journal Applied Economics, 18 (1): 101-117.Dawson, W. J., Sen, A. (2007) “New evidence on the convergence of international income from a group of 29 countries”, Empirical Economics, 33: 199-230.Delgado, F., Presno, M. (2011): “Convergence of fiscal pressure in the EU: a time series approach”, Applied Economics, 43: 4257-4267.Erlat, H. (2012): “Türkiye’de Bölgesel Yakınsama Sorununa Zaman Dizisi Yaklaşımı”, Discussion Paper, Turkish Economic Association, 64: 251-276.
  4. Esenyel, M. (2017) “Türkiye’de Enerji Yakınsama Hipotezinin Sınanması: Yapısal Kırılmalı Birim Kök Analizi”, Social Sciences Research Journal, 6 (3): 42-52.
  5. European Commission. (2004) Strategy Paper. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood/enlargement/sites/near/files/2004_communication_from_the_commission__european_neighbourhood_policy_-_strategy_paper.pdf., (Erişim: 07.12.2017).Galvao, A. F., Gomes, R. (2007) “Convergence or Divergence in Latin America? A time series analysis”, Applied Economics, 39 (11): 1353-1360.Greasley, D., Oxley, L. (1995) “A Time Series Perspective on Convergence: Australia, UK nad USA since 1870”, The Economic Record, 71 (214): 2