Journals / Mathematical and Computational Applications / 1996 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Buckling of heavy bars

Pages
93–99
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With the help of this asymptotic evaluation, the critical buckling forces for long heavy bars are found.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The calculation for the buckling of a short bar under compression occurs normally through the neglect of its own weight.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This method is no longer permissible for long heavy bars.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With the help of this asymptotic evaluation, the critical buckling forces for long heavy bars are found.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The calculation for the buckling of a short bar under compression occurs normally through the neglect of its own weight. This method is no longer permissible for long heavy bars. In this case, the net weight must be taken into consideration. Such long heavy bars can be found, for example, as drilling-risers in ocean exploration technology, as schafis in mining, as steel turrets for the production of energy and as naturally grown mammoth trees. In this paper, the critical buckling forces are derived from ten end conditions for heavy bars which are surrounded by air and burdened by compression. There is an analytical solution to the differential equation of the problem which requires a numerical evaluation. Limited computer capacity permits calculations of critical buckling forces only up to a certain length. An analytical solution to the differential equation must be developed asymptotically for long heavy bars. With the help of this asymptotic evaluation, the critical buckling forces for long heavy bars are found.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDAMAR, A. (1996). Buckling of heavy bars. Mathematical and Computational Applications, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 93–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/263382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Bemitsas, M.-Kokkinis, T.: Asymptptic Behaviorof Riser Stability Boundaries, Publication 255, Departmentof Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1982. [2]Bernitsas, M.-Kokkinis, T.: Bucklingof Columns with Nonmovable Boundaries, Journal of Structural Engineering 109, 1983,p. 2113-2128. [3]Bernitsas, M.-Kokkinis,T.: Buckling of Columns with Movable Boundaries, Joumal of Structural Mechanics 11,1983,p. 351-370 [4]Bemitsas, M.-Kokkinis,T.: Asymptotic Behavior of Heavy Column and Riser Stability Boundaries, Journal of Applied Mechanics 51,1984, p. 560-565. [5]Greenhill, A.G.: On Height Consistent With Stability, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol.IV,1881,p. 5-7. [6]Rapel, K.H: Festigkeitsan1yse dynamisch beanspruchter Offshore-Konstruktionen,Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden,1990. [7]Ozdamar, A.: Das Knicken schwerer Gestaenge, VWF Verlag fur Wissenschaft und Forschung, ISBN3-930324-71-7, Berlin, 1996. [8]Plunkett,R.: Static Bending Stressesin Catenaries and Drill Strings, Journal of Engineering for Industry 89,1967,p. 31-36. [9]Willers, F. A.: Das Knicken schwerer Gestaenge, Z. angew. Math. Mech., Bd. 21, Dresden, 1941,p.43-51