SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Online Fen Eğitimi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Step-by-Step Argument Map in Learning Environment: Example of Optic

Büşra Nur ÇAKAN AKKAŞ
Elif SÖNMEZ
Esra KABATAŞ MEMİŞ
Pages
15–25
Publication Date
2018-12-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, discussions on how to use argument mapping in the learning environment and related argument maps are presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The argument is defined as the whole of contentions that are related to each in other in terms of interference.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The argument map serves to visually present the arguments with an inferential structure using graphical techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, discussions on how to use argument mapping in the learning environment and related argument maps are presented.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Argumentation · argument mapping · science teaching

Özet

The argument is defined as the whole of contentions that are related to each in other in terms of interference. The argument map serves to visually present the arguments with an inferential structure using graphical techniques. Argument maps help individuals visualize and evaluate the process of reasoning. In learning environments, argument mapping helps in higher level thinking and establishing connections between information. The purpose of the study is to enable science teacher candidates to create individual and interactive argument maps by using RationaleTM program in the subject of lenses. The argument mapping process was carried out via the online software “RationaleTM”. The argument maps of “Lenses” sub-section of “Optics” subjects are examined at the higher education level with the software. In addition, discussions on how to use argument mapping in the learning environment and related argument maps are presented.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKAŞ, B. N. Ç., SÖNMEZ, E., MEMİŞ, E. K. (2018). Step-by-Step Argument Map in Learning Environment: Example of Optic. Online Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 15–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/263012

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Davies, W. (2009). Computer-assisted argument mapping: a rationale approach. High Education(58), 799-820.
  2. Garcia-Mila, M., & Andersen, C. (2007). Cognitive foundations of leaning argumentation. Argumentation in Science Education (s. 34). Springer. Harrel, M. (2007). Using Argument Diagramming Software to Teach. Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal Of research İn Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1026.
  3. Pashler, H. (2011).
  4. Argument mapping. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). Argument-driven ınquiry to promote the understanding of important concept &practises in biology. The American Biology Teacher, 71(8), 465- ter Berg, T., & van der Brugge, E. (2013). Teaching critical thinking with rationale. 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. Valencia, Spain. Twardy, C. (2004). Argument maps improve critical thinking. Teaching Philosophy, 27(2), 95-116. van Gelder, T. (2002). Argument mapping with Reasonable. APA Newsletter: Philosophy & Computers, 2(1), 85-90. van Gelder, T. (2007).
  5. The rationale for RationaleTM. Law, Probability and Risk, 1-20. doi:doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm032. van Gelder, T. (2009, February 17). What is argument mapping? November 2, 2018 in received.