Journals / Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

A theoretical framework for training socially accountable science teachers

Pages
159–175
Publication Date
2019-06-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The researcher believes that a curriculum that is based on this framework could facilitate the adoption of social transformation and social accountability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Social accountability has been accepted as a framework, through which the needs of communities are prioritized in all education systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Such as education should integrate knowledge-, reality- and an inquiry-orientation for the selection of content and planning the sequence of learning experiences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The researcher believes that a curriculum that is based on this framework could facilitate the adoption of social transformation and social accountability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Citizenship education · Curriculum ideologies · Resource-restrained communities

Abstract

Social accountability has been accepted as a framework, through which the needs of communities are prioritized in all education systems. However, there are considerable differences in the needs of communities in resource restrained communities compared with well resources communities. Consequently, there is a need for a specific theoretical framework which will inform curriculum design for science teacher training in resource restrained communities. In such a framework the researcher proposes the adoption of citizenship education as the philosophical basis for social accountability in education. Such as education should integrate knowledge-, reality- and an inquiry-orientation for the selection of content and planning the sequence of learning experiences. It should also reflect citizenship-centred ideology as a central principle of the curriculum. The researcher believes that a curriculum that is based on this framework could facilitate the adoption of social transformation and social accountability.

🔖

Cite This Article

MNGUNİ, L. (2019). A theoretical framework for training socially accountable science teachers. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 159–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/262526

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Barr, R., Barth, J., & Shermis, S. (1978). The Nature of the Social Studies. Palm Springs, California: ETC Publications. Bobbitt, F. (1918). The curriculum. Boston: Riverside Press Boelen, C. (2008). Social accountability: Medical education’s boldest challenge. MEDICC review, 10(4), 52. Chen, L., Evans, T., Anand, S., Boufford, J., Brown, H., Chowdhury, M., Cueto, M., Dare, L., Dussault, G., Elzinga, G., Fee, E., Habte, D., Hanvoravongchai, P., Jacobs, M., Kurowski, C., Michael, S., Pablos-Mendez, A., Sewankambo, N., Solimano, G., Stilwell, B., de Waal, A., & Wibulpolprasert, S. (2004). Human resources for health: overcoming the crisis. The Lancet, 364(9449), 1984-1990.
  2. Cherryholmes, C. H. (1980). Social knowledge and citizenship education: Two views of truth and criticism. Curriculum Inquiry, 10(2), 115-141.
  3. Cotti, R., & Schiro, M. (2004). Connecting teacher beliefs to the use of children’s literature in the teaching of mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(4), 329-356.
  4. Davis, J. E. (1983). Planning a Social Studies Program: Activities, Guidelines, and Resources.(Revised Edition). Social Science Education Consortium, Inc., 855 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80302. Dewey, J. (2013). My pedagogic creed. In Curriculum Studies Reader E2 (pp. 29-35).
  5. Routledge. Dewey, J. (1916).
  6. Democracy and education. New York, Free Press.
  7. Donohue, D., & Bornman, J. (2014). The challenges of realising inclusive education in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 34(2), 01-14.
  8. Donovan, B., & Ross, M. W. (2000). Preventing HIV: determinants of sexual behaviour. The Lancet, 355(9218), 1897-1901.
  9. Eastwood, R., & Lipton, M. (1999). The impact of changes in human fertility on poverty. The Journal of Development Studies, 36(1), 1-30.
  10. Frank, Jason R. "The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework." http://rcpsc. medical. org/canmeds/CanMEDS2005/CanMEDS2005_e. pdf (2005).
  11. Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., Fineberg, H., Garcia, P., Ke, Y., Kelley, P., Kistnasamy, B., Meleis, A., Naylor, D., Pablos-Mendez, A., Reddy, S., Scrimshaw, S., Sepulveda, J., Serwadda, D., & Zurayk, H. (2010). Health professionals for a new century, transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet, 376, 1923–58
  12. Good, C. (1959)
  13. Dictionary of Education. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co. Green-Thompson, L. P. (2013). Are we socially accountable educators?. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 5(1), 2. Hunt, M.