Journals / Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Level of combinatorial thinking in solving mathematical problems

Pages
1231–1243
Publication Date
2020-09-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that there are five levels of combinatorial thinking in solving mathematical problems: investigating “some cases’, systematically checking cases, using the calculation order, systematically generating all cases, and changing the problem into another combinatorial problem.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Combinatorial thinking is an important reasoning process in building one's knowledge and experience.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The subjects of the study were 40 students of Elementary Teacher Education Department (PGSD): 20 students of the second semester and the others of the sixth semester.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that there are five levels of combinatorial thinking in solving mathematical problems: investigating “some cases’, systematically checking cases, using the calculation order, systematically generating all cases, and changing the problem into another combinatorial problem.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Combinatorial thinking level · Mathematics education · Mathematical problems

Abstract

Combinatorial thinking is an important reasoning process in building one's knowledge and experience. The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics of the level of combinatorial thinking in solving mathematical problems. The subjects of the study were 40 students of Elementary Teacher Education Department (PGSD): 20 students of the second semester and the others of the sixth semester. The reason for choosing subjects from these two levels is to meet all levels of combinatorial thinking. All research subjects were given test questions about combinatorial problems. From 40 subjects, five students were selected to be interviewed as they had fulfilled all five levels of combinatorial thinking. The data validity was conducted by triangulation through recording interview results and comparing it with data from students' written test results to ensure the validity and reliability of this research. The results show that there are five levels of combinatorial thinking in solving mathematical problems: investigating “some cases’, systematically checking cases, using the calculation order, systematically generating all cases, and changing the problem into another combinatorial problem. Level one is the identification of the possibility of students’ understanding the questions incorrectly, or vice versa, already can answer the questions with systematic procedures but the results are less precise. Level two is conducting systematic checking about students' understanding of the combination material. Besides, it also concerns about the ability to answer problems systematically using diagram trees. Level three is students are able to apply the calculation orders, which are addition and multiplication. Level four is systematically generating all cases about the ability to calculate possibilities without schematic, drawings, or diagrams. Level five is changing the problem into another combinatorial problem, it is the ability to calculate possibilities with complex problems Based on the research findings, it turns out there is another level of combinatorial thinking, which is using the calculation order and this is found between level two and level three. The researchers recommend further research to explore more on the application of calculation order.

🔖

Cite This Article

HİDAYATİ, Y. M., NGALİM, A., SUTAMA, S., ARİFİN, Z., ABİDİN, Z., RAHMAWATİ, E. (2020). Level of combinatorial thinking in solving mathematical problems. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 1231–1243. https://ajindex.com/articles/262508

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Al-Mutawah, M. A., Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. J. (2019).
  2. Conceptual Understanding, Procedural Knowledge and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics: High School Graduates Work Analysis and Standpoints. International Journal of Education and Practice 7(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273.al
  3. Balera, J. M., & Júnior, V. A. S. (2017). An Algorithm for Combinatorial Interaction Testing: Definitions and Rigorous Evaluations. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development 5(1), 2-41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40411-017-0043-z.
  4. Batanero, C., Navarro-Pelayo, V., & Godino, J. D. (1997). Effect of the Implicit Combinatorial Model on Combinatorial Reasoning in Secondary School Pupils. Educational Studies in Mathematics 32(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A
  5. Cresswell, J. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Qualitative and Quantitative Research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc. Cuevas, O., Larios, V., Peralta, J. X., & Jiménez, A. R. (2018). Mathematical Knowledge of Students who Aspire to Enroll in Engineering Programs. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 13(3), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3832.
  6. Eizenberg, M., M., & Zaslavsky, O. (2004). Students’ Verification Strategies for Combinatorial Problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(1): 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0601_2.
  7. English, L.D. (1991). Young children’s combinatoric strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(5), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367908
  8. English, L.D. (2005). Combinatorics and the Development of Children’s Combinatorial Reasoning. Exploring Probability in School: Challenges for Teaching and Learning, 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24530-8_6.
  9. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report 8(4): 597-606.
  10. Hayashi, T., & Ohsawa, Y. (2013). Processing Combinatorial Thinking: International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, 4(3), 14–38. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijkss.2013070102
  11. Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing Levels and Components of a Math-Talk Learning Community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034933
  12. Jazim, Anwar, B. A., & Rahmawati, D. (2017). The Use of Mathematical Module Based on Constructivism Approach as Media to Implant the Concept of Algebra Operation. International E