Journals / Sakarya Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Sociodemographic and Clinical Status and Its Associations with Disability in Patients With Prediabetes

Prediyabet Tanılı Hastaların Sosyodemografik ve Klinik Durumları ve Engellilik ile İlişkisi

Pages
319–325
Publication Date
2019-06-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of people with these characteristics, especially those with high risk of prediabetes, can prevent the development of diabetes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed in this study that to describe the sociodemographic and clinical status of the patients with prediabetes in a tertiarry internal medicine outpatient clinic.Method: Participants in this study are from Kayseri City Hospital in 2018 between June and December.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was restricted to participants who were aged 18-65, had blood glucose levels in prediabetic range (n=96).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of people with these characteristics, especially those with high risk of prediabetes, can prevent the development of diabetes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:engellilik · prediyabet · sosyodemografik durum

Abstract

Objective: We aimed in this study that to describe the sociodemographic and clinical status of the patients with prediabetes in a tertiarry internal medicine outpatient clinic.Method: Participants in this study are from Kayseri City Hospital in 2018 between June and December. This study was restricted to participants who were aged 18-65, had blood glucose levels in prediabetic range (n=96). Participants' age, gender, marital status, wage, education, profession, employment, smoking status, alcohol use, height, weight, body mass index, insulin resistance were based on self-report and our measurements.Results: The half of the patients with prediabetes was IFG (n=50) and the least subgroup was IGT (n=14) in our study also. Combined group was higher (n=32). 71 of them were female (74%). 23 patients smoked at any time and mean packet-year was 27.78 (min:1, max: 95, sd: 23.55), 93 patients (96.7%) never used alcohol. 15 patients were retired and only one of them was caused by disablement. The rate of insulin resistant patients was 50%. Marital status were single (n=1), married (n=89), widow/widower (n=5), divorced (n=1). There is a higher rate of obesity in prediabetic patients in our study. BMI are respectively 1% (≤ 18.5 kg/m2); 9% (18.6-24.9 kg/m2); 18% (25.0-29.9 kg/m2); 68.76% (≥30 kg/m2). Conclusion: Prediabetes is an increasingly common disease, leading to serious morbidities. Most patients are obese and female. Most female patients of prediabetic patients are housewives. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of people with these characteristics, especially those with high risk of prediabetes, can prevent the development of diabetes.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada 3. basamak iç hastalıkları polikliniğine başvuran prediyabetik hastalarda sosyodemografik ve klinik verileri tanımlamayı ve engellilik ile ilişkisini araştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntem: Kayseri Şehir Hastanesi İç Hastalıkları polikliniğine Haziran-Aralık 2018 tarihleri arasında başvuran ve prediyabet tanısı alan, 18-65 yaş arası hastalar çalışmaya alındı (n=96). Hastaların yaşı, cinsiyeti, evlilik durumu, maaşı, eğitim durumu, işi, emeklilik durumu, sigara ve alkol kullanım durumu, boy, kilo ve vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ), insulin direnci varlığı kaydedildi. Bulgular: Prediyabetik hastaların yarısında (n=50) bozulmuş açlık glukozu (BAG) mevcutken 14 hastada bozulmuş glukoz toleransı vardı. Diğer hastalarda hem BAG hem de BGT vardı (n=32). Hastaların 71'i (74%) kadındı. 23 hasta sigara içiyordu ve ortalama 27.78 ( ss: 23.55) paket-yıl sigara kullanmışlardı. 93 hasta (96.7%) hiç alkol almamıştı. 15 hasta emekli iken sadece biri maluliyet nedeni ileydi. Hastaların yarısında insulin direnci vardı. 1 hasta bekar, 5 hasta dul,1 hasta boşanmış ve diğer hastalar evliydi. VKİ'ye göre obezite durumu sırasıyla VKİ≤ 18.5 kg/m2 %1 hasta; VKİ = 18.6-24.9 kg/m2 %9 hasta; VKİ=25.0-29.9 kg/m2 %18 hasta; VKİ≥30 kg/m2 %68.76 hasta idi. Ortanca HAQ-DI skoru 0.125 (IQR: 0-0.625) idi ve 67 (69.9%) hastada engellilik durumu yoktu (HAQ-DI score was 0-0.375). Sonuç: Prediyabet gittikçe artan sıklıkta görülen yaygın bir hastalık olup ciddi morbidite sebebi olabilir. Hastaların çoğunluğu kadın ve obezdir. Kadın prediyabetik hastaların da çoğu ev hanımı idi. Bu hastalarda erken tanı ve uygun tedavi ile ciddi bir halk sağlığı sorunu olan aynı zamanda engellilik, ciddi morbidite ve mortalite sebebi de olan diyabet gelişmesinden korunulabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Topaloğlu, U. S., Erol, K. (2019). Sociodemographic and Clinical Status and Its Associations with Disability in Patients With Prediabetes. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 319–325. https://ajindex.com/articles/261804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bilandzic A, Rosella L. The cost of diabetes in Canada over 10 years: applying attributable health care costs to a diabetes incidence prediction model. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can 2017;37:49-53. Häring HU. Novel phenotypes of prediabetes? Diabetologia. 2016 Sep;59(9):1806-18. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2017. Diabetes Care 2017;40:S11–24. Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, et al. Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012. JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1021-9.
  2. Wang L, Gao P, Zhang M, et al. Prevalence and Ethnic Pattern of Diabetes and Prediabetes in China in 2013. JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2515-2523.
  3. Middelbeek RJW, Abrahamson MJ. Diabetes, prediabetes, and glycemic control in the United States: challenges and opportunities. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160:572–3.
  4. Alberti K, Zimmet P, Shaw J. International Diabetes Federation: a consensus on type 2 diabetes prevention. Diab Med. 2007;24:451-263.
  5. Stefan N, Fritsche A, Schick F, et al. Phenotypes of prediabetes and stratification of cardiometabolic risk. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(9):789-798. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Diabetes and disability: impairments, activity limitations, participation restrictions and comorbidities. Canberra: AIHW, 2013. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000; 894: i–xii, 1–253.
  6. Ramey DR, Raynauld JP, Fries JF. The health assessment questionnaire 1992: status and review. Arthritis Care Res. 1992;5:119–129.
  7. Küçükdeveci AA, Sahin H, Ataman S, et al. Issues in cross-cultural validity: example from the adaptation, reliability, and validity testing of a Turkish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(1):14-9.
  8. Odding E, Valkenburg HA, Stam HJ, et al. Determinants of locomotor disability in people aged 55 years and over: the Rotterdam Study. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2001;17:1033–1041.
  9. Haffner SM, Miettinen H, Stern MP. The homeostasis model in the San Antonio Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(7):1087-92.
  10. Kelestimur F, Cetin M, Paşaoğlu H, et al. The prevalence and identification of risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in Kayseri, central Anatolia, Turkey. Acta Diabetol. 1999;36(1-2):85-91.
  11. Satman I, Yilmaz T, Sengül A, et al. Population-based study of diabetes and risk characteristics in Turkey: results of the turkis