SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Life Economics / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

APPROACH TO PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVISION OF HEALTH CARE SERVİCES: SURVEY OF UŞAK CITY

Ufuk Selen
Göksel Karaş
Pages
25–46
Publication Date
2015-07-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to analysis results it was observed that health sector employees and health service beneficiaries do not have enough information about PPP applications and they are uncertain about whether they will provide the expected benefits or not.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Due to their characteristics, health care services can be funded and provided in public and private economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Providing them mostly in public economy due to its positive externalities can cause heavy pressures on public financing balances.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to analysis results it was observed that health sector employees and health service beneficiaries do not have enough information about PPP applications and they are uncertain about whether they will provide the expected benefits or not.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Health Care Services · Public Goods · Public Private Partnerships (PPP)

Abstract

Due to their characteristics, health care services can be funded and provided in public and private economy. Providing them mostly in public economy due to its positive externalities can cause heavy pressures on public financing balances. In order to minimize public financing problems caused by health care services and taking the advantages of administrative and financial superiorities of private sector the tendency for the privatization of health care services is gradually increasing. Recently PPP applications, one of the privatization models, have been observed to be used commonly in health sector. At that point the objective of the study is defined as to identify the perspectives of public sector employees and health service beneficiaries about PPP applications. In the context of this purpose how PPP applications are perceived in Uşak city is researched by presenting the working principles of PPP models specific to health sector. Within the scope of analyses the perception about the expectations from PPP applications in health sector is identified first. According to analysis results it was observed that health sector employees and health service beneficiaries do not have enough information about PPP applications and they are uncertain about whether they will provide the expected benefits or not.

Özet

Due to their characteristics, health care services can be funded and provided in public and private economy. Providing them mostly in public economy due to its positive externalities can cause heavy pressures on public financing balances. In order to minimize public financing problems caused by health care services and taking the advantages of administrative and financial superiorities of private sector the tendency for the privatization of health care services is gradually increasing. Recently PPP applications, one of the privatization models, have been observed to be used commonly in health sector. At that point the objective of the study is defined as to identify the perspectives of public sector employees and health service beneficiaries about PPP applications. In the context of this purpose how PPP applications are perceived in Uşak city is researched by presenting the working principles of PPP models specific to health sector. Within the scope of analyses the perception about the expectations from PPP applications in health sector is identified first. According to analysis results it was observed that health sector employees and health service beneficiaries do not have enough information about PPP applications and they are uncertain about whether they will provide the expected benefits or not.

🔖

Cite This Article

Selen, U., Karaş, G. (2015). APPROACH TO PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVISION OF HEALTH CARE SERVİCES: SURVEY OF UŞAK CITY. Journal of Life Economics, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 25–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/2613

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. ACARTÜRK, E. ve KESKIN, S.,(2011).Türkiye’de Sağlık Hizmetlerinin Sunumunda Kamu Özel Ortaklığı Modeli (Aydın Örneği),Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Maliye Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi. ACARTÜRK, E. ve KESKIN, S.,(2012). Türkiye’de Sağlık Sektöründe Kamu Özel Ortaklığı Modeli, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, C.17, S.3. BABAR, Z. D. and IZHAM, M. I. (2009). Effect of privatization of thedrug distribution system on drugprices in Malaysia. PublicHealth,123(8), 523–533.
  2. BLOOM, David E. (1998), Public and Private Roles in Providing and Financing Reproductive Health Care, Harvard Institute for International Development Harvard University COLOMBINI, M., MAYHEW, S. H., ALI, S. H., SHUIB, R. and WATTS, C. (2012). An Integrated healths ector response to violence against women in Malaysia: Lessonsfor supporting caleup.BMC PublicHealth, 12(548), nopagination. De BETTIGNIES, J. E. and ROSS, T. (2009).Public private partnerships and the privatization of financing: An incomplete contracts approach, International Journal of Industrial Organization 27. 358–368.
  3. DEWATRIPONT, M.and LEGROS, P, (2005), Public-private partnerships: contract design and risk transfer, EIB Papers, 10 (1): 120-145.
  4. ENER, Meliha ve DEMIRCAN, Esra, (2008). Küreselleşme Sürecinde Değişen Devlet Anlayışından Kamu Hizmetlerinin Dönüşümüne: Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Piyasa Mekanizmaları. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1). ENGEL, E., R. FISHER, and GALETOVIC, A. (2006).Renegotiation without hold up: Anticipating spending in infrastructure concessions. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 1567. GUASCH, J. L. (2004).Granting and renegotiating infrastructure concenssions: Doing it right. WBI Development Studies, the World Bank. GÜNGÖR, H. (2012). Sağlık Sektöründe Kamu-Özel İşbirliği Uygulamaları ve Türkiye İçin Değerlendirme, Uzmanlık Tezi.www.kalkinma.gov.tr/KamuOzelIsbirligiYayinlar/2_ Password_Removed. (Ac.: 01.02.2014)
  5. HANSON, K., BERMAN P. (1998), Privatehealthcareprovision in developingcountries: a preliminaryanalysis of levelsandcomposition.Health 13:3. 195-211.
  6. IOSSA, E. and MARTIMORT, D. (2015), The Simple Microeconomics of Public-Private Partnerships,Journal of Public Economic Theory, 17 (1), 2015. pp. 4–48.
  7. ISMAIL, S.,and AJIJA, S. R. (2011). Critical successfactorsforpublic-privatepartnership (PPP) implementation in Malaysia. Proc. OftheSeventhJointVenture International Conference, Se