SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Life Economics / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

SIGNALING, BIRD IN THE HAND AND CATERING EFFECT IN INDONESIA

Winston PONTOH
Pages
1–24
Publication Date
2015-07-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that, dividend has significant effect to stock price, and conversely, stock price also has significant effect to dividend.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It had been known that the presence of dividend will affect the value of shares in the stock market, but since the dividend payers also belief that, their stock price will increase by paying dividend to investors, then it seems these phenomenon are becoming very complex to explain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results show that, dividend has significant effect to stock price, and conversely, stock price also has significant effect to dividend.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In further analysis, this study find, the most specific characteristics for dividend payers who paying dividend continuously compared to other dividend payers are larger number of shares, larger fixed assets, largest total assets, largest total debt, largest retained earnings, largest revenue, and largest net income.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:SIGNALING · BIRD IN THE HAND AND CATERING EFFECT IN INDONESIA · SIGNALING

Abstract

It had been known that the presence of dividend will affect the value of shares in the stock market, but since the dividend payers also belief that, their stock price will increase by paying dividend to investors, then it seems these phenomenon are becoming very complex to explain. The objective of this study is want to give an empirical evidence whether dividend plays the main role for fluctuation of stock price or vice versa in the stock market. The results show that, dividend has significant effect to stock price, and conversely, stock price also has significant effect to dividend. The implications of this study are fit for signaling effect, bird in the hand effect, and catering effect which is dominated by dividend payers who paying dividend continuously. In further analysis, this study find, the most specific characteristics for dividend payers who paying dividend continuously compared to other dividend payers are larger number of shares, larger fixed assets, largest total assets, largest total debt, largest retained earnings, largest revenue, and largest net income.

Özet

It had been known that the presence of dividend will affect the value of shares in the stock market, but since the dividend payers also belief that, their stock price will increase by paying dividend to investors, then it seems these phenomenon are becoming very complex to explain. The objective of this study is want to give an empirical evidence whether dividend plays the main role for fluctuation of stock price or vice versa in the stock market. The results show that, dividend has significant effect to stock price, and conversely, stock price also has significant effect to dividend. The implications of this study are fit for signaling effect, bird in the hand effect, and catering effect which is dominated by dividend payers who paying dividend continuously. In further analysis, this study find, the most specific characteristics for dividend payers who paying dividend continuously compared to other dividend payers are larger number of shares, larger fixed assets, largest total assets, largest total debt, largest retained earnings, largest revenue, and largest net income.

🔖

Cite This Article

PONTOH, W. (2015). SIGNALING, BIRD IN THE HAND AND CATERING EFFECT IN INDONESIA. Journal of Life Economics, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 1–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/2612

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. ABOODY, D., BARTH, M.E., & KASZNIK, R. (1999). Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1-3), 149-178.
  2. ABRUTYN, S., & TURNER, R.W. (1990). Taxes & Firm’s Dividend Policies: Survey Results. National Tax Journal, 43(4), 491-96.
  3. ACHARYA, S. (1988). A Generalized Econometric Model and Tests of a Signalling Hypothesis with Two Discrete Signals. The Journal of Finance, 43(2), 413-429.
  4. ACKERT, L. F., & SMITH, B. F. (1993).
  5. Stock Price Volatility, Ordinary Dividends, and Other Cash Flows to Shareholders. The Journal of Finance, 48(4), 1147-1160.
  6. AHARONY, J., & SWARY, I. (1980). Quarterly Dividend and Earnings Announcements and Stockholders' Returns: An Empirical Analysis. The Journal of Finance, 35(1), 1-12.
  7. ASQUITH, P., & MULLINS, D. W., Jr. (1986).
  8. Signalling with Dividends, Stock Repurchases, and Equity Issues. Financial Management, 15(3), 27-44.
  9. BAKER, H. K., & HASLEM, J. A. (1974). Toward the Development of Client-Specified Valuation Models. The Journal of Finance, 29(4), 1255-1263.
  10. BAKER, M., & WURGLER, J. (2004a). A Catering Theory of Dividends. The Journal of Finance, 59(30), 1125-1165.
  11. BAKER, M., & WURGLER, J. (2004b). Appearing and Disappearing Dividends: The Link to Catering Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 271–288.
  12. BAKER, M., & WURGLER, J. (2006). Investor Sentiment and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680.
  13. BAKER, M., & WURGLER, J. (2007). Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129-151.
  14. BARSKY, R. B., & DE LONG, J. B. (1993). Why Does the Stock Market Fluctuate? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(2), 291-311.
  15. BEAVER, W. H. (1968). The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 67-92.
  16. BENARTZI, S., MICHAELY, R., & THALER, R. (1997). Do Changes in Dividends Signal the Future or the Past? The Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1007-1034.
  17. BHATTACHARYA, S. (1979).
  18. Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and "The Bird in the Hand" Fallacy. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259-270.
  19. BLACK, F. (1996). The Dividend Puzzle. The Journal of Portfolio Management, Special Issue, 8-12.
  20. BRENNAN, M. J., & THAKOR, A. V. (1990). Shareholders Preferences and Dividend Policy. The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 990-1018.
  21. CAMPBELL, J. Y., & KYLE, A. S. (1993).
  22. Smart Money, Noise Trading, and Stock Price Behavior. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(1