Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Investigating the Significance of a Correlation Coefficient using Bootstrap Estimates

Bootstrap Tahminini Kullanarak Pearson Korelasyon Katsayısının Önemliliğinin Araştırılması

Pages
77–88
Publication Date
2019-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, it is recommended to use the bootstrap method as an alternative to the classical and knife (one exclusion procedure) test statistics in evaluating the significance of the Pearson correlation coefficient by applying the bootstrap method to the simple linear regression model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Resampling methods offers effective estimates of parameters and its asymptotic distribution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the application, the model parameters, standard errors, Pearson coefficients of correlation, bias and % 95 confidence intervals belonging to bootstrap and jackknife methods in estimated with the help of a real data and the obtained results are interpreted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, it is recommended to use the bootstrap method as an alternative to the classical and knife (one exclusion procedure) test statistics in evaluating the significance of the Pearson correlation coefficient by applying the bootstrap method to the simple linear regression model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bootstrap · Çakı · Basit lineer regresyon

Abstract

Resampling methods offers effective estimates of parameters and its asymptotic distribution. In this study, it is recommended to use the bootstrap method as an alternative to the classical and knife (one exclusion procedure) test statistics in evaluating the significance of the Pearson correlation coefficient by applying the bootstrap method to the simple linear regression model. This procedure provides an effective alternative to test the significance of the Pearson correlation coefficient. In the application, the model parameters, standard errors, Pearson coefficients of correlation, bias and % 95 confidence intervals belonging to bootstrap and jackknife methods in estimated with the help of a real data and the obtained results are interpreted. As a result, the test statistic obtained by the bootstrap method is proposed as an alternative to the classical and jackknife test statistics.

Özet

Yeniden örnekleme yöntemleri parametrelerin etkili tahminlerini ve asimptotik dağılımlarını sunar. Bu çalışmada, basit doğrusal regresyon modeline bootstrap yöntemi uygulanarak Pearson korelasyon katsayısının anlamlılığının değerlendirilmesinde klasik ve çakı (birini dışarıda bırak işlemi) test istatistiklerine alternatif olarak bootstrap yönteminin kullanılması önerilmektedir. Bu prosedür Pearson korelasyon katsayısının anlamlılığını test etmek için etkili bir alternatif sağlar. Uygulamada bootstrap ve çakı yöntemlerine ait model parametreleri, standart hatalar, Pearson korelasyon katsayısı, yanlılık ve %95 güven aralığı gerçek bir veri yardımıyla elde edilerek sonuçlar yorumlanmıştır. Sonuçta, bootstrap yöntemi ile elde edilen test istatistiği, klasik ve çakı tabanlı test istatistiğine alternatif bir yöntem olarak önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZAMAN, T., ALAKUŞ, K. (2019). Investigating the Significance of a Correlation Coefficient using Bootstrap Estimates. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 77–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/260941

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. M.R. Chernick, Bootstrap Methods a Guide for Practitioners and Researchers. 2nd ed; John Wiley & Sons Inc, New Jersey, 2008 B. Efron, “Bootstrap Method; Another Look at Jackknife,” Annals of Statistics, 7, 1-26, 1979. D.A. Freedman, “Bootstrapping Regression Models,” Annals of Statistics, 1 (6), 1218-1228, 1981. C. F. J. Wu, “Jackknife, Bootstrap and other Resampling Methods in Regression Analysis,” Annals of Statistics, 14 (4), 1261-1290, 1986.
  2. Z. Y. Algamal, K. B. Rasheed, “Re-sampling in Linear Regression Model Using Jackknife and Bootstrap,” Iraqi Journal of Statistical Science, 18, 59-73, 2010.
  3. A. Akpanta, I. Okorie, “Investigating the Significance of a Correlation Coefficient using Jackknife Estimates,” International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 22 (2), 2015. M. H. Quenouille, “Approximate tests of correlation in time series,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 11, 18-44, 1949. M. H. Quenouille, “Notes on bias in estimation,” Biometrika, 61, 353-360, 1956. J. W. Tukey, “Bias and confidence in not-quite large sample,” Ann. Math. Stat., 29, 614, 1958.
  4. S. Lohr, Sampling: design and analysis. Nelson Education, 2009.
  5. H. Friedl, E. Stampfer, “Jackknife Resampling”, Encyclopaedia of Econometrics. 2, 1089-1098, 2002.
  6. S. Sahinler, D. Topuz, “Bootstrap and Jackknife Resampling Algorithms for Estimation of Regression Parameters,” Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 2 (2), 188-199, 2007.
  7. H. Abdi, J.L Williams, Jackknife. In Neil Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2010. B. Efron, “Bootstrap Method; another Look at Jackknife,” Annals of Statistics, 7 (1), 26, 1979.
  8. M. R. Chernıck, Bootstrap methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers. John Wiley & Sons, 619, 2008 N. Hamajıma, “Methods for Statistical Inferences,” Biotheraphy-Tokyo, 13, 739-744, 1999.
  9. R. Stine, Modern Methods of Data Analysis, by John Fox, Scotland: 325- 373, 1990. N. Barker, “A Practical İntroduction to The Bootstrap Using The Sas System”. In SAS Conference Proceedings: Phuse 2005:
  10. Heidelberg, Germany SAS D. Okutan, Bootstrap Yönteminin Regresyon Analizinde Kullanımı ve Diğer Yöntemlerle Karşılaştırılması. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir, 2009.
  11. J. Fox, Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models and Related Methods. Sage Publications Inc., 1997.
  12. D. Topuz, Regresyonda Yeniden Örnekleme Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Olarak İncelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Niğde, 2002. Sperman's Co