SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

An Alternative Method for Determining the Iteration Number for Reconstruction Algorithms Used in Diffuse Optical Tomography Systems

Difüz Optik Tomografi Sistemlerinde Kullanılan Geri Çatım Algoritmaları için İterasyon Sayısını Belirmede Alternatif Bir Yöntem

Gençay SEVİM
Yiğit Ali ÜNCÜ
Murat CANPOLAT
Pages
246–258
Publication Date
2021-05-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The iteration determination algorithm developed in this study has been integrated into Truncated Conjugate Gradient (TCG), Bi-Conjugate Gradient, and Transpose Free Quasi Minimal Residual (TFQMR) algorithms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Diffuse Optical Tomography (DOT) systems are optical medical imaging methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The image reconstruction stage of DOT systems is very important.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The iteration determination algorithm developed in this study has been integrated into Truncated Conjugate Gradient (TCG), Bi-Conjugate Gradient, and Transpose Free Quasi Minimal Residual (TFQMR) algorithms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Difüz Optik Tomografi · İterasyon Sayısı Belirleme · Geri Çatım Algoritmaları

Abstract

Diffuse Optical Tomography (DOT) systems are optical medical imaging methods. The image reconstruction stage of DOT systems is very important. This study is aimed to determine the ideal number of iterations for the iterative reconstruction algorithms used in the DOT system with an alternative to the methods in the literature. This method has a similar working principle to the Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) method. In order to test this method, simulation experiments have been carried out with MATLAB. After the simulation data was created, the reconstruction algorithms created the images of the simulated data with the number of iterations determined using the CNR-like iteration determination algorithm. The iteration determination algorithm developed in this study has been integrated into Truncated Conjugate Gradient (TCG), Bi-Conjugate Gradient, and Transpose Free Quasi Minimal Residual (TFQMR) algorithms.

Özet

Difüz Optik Tomografi (DOT) sistemleri optik medikal görüntüleme yöntemlerindendir. DOT sistemlerinin görüntü oluşturma aşaması oldukça önemlidir. Bu çalışma da DOT sisteminde kullanılan iteratif geri çatım algoritmaları için ideal iterasyon sayının literatürdeki metotlara alternatif bir metot ile belirlenebilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu metodun, kontrast-gürültü oranı (Contrast to Noise Ratio, CNR) metoduna benzer bir çalışma prensibi vardır. Bu metodu test edebilmek için MATLAB programı ile simülasyon deneyleri yapılmıştır. Simülasyon verisi oluşturulduktan sonra CNR benzeri iterasyon belirleme algoritması kullanılarak belirlenen iterasyon sayısı ile geri çatım algoritmaları modellenen verinin görüntülerini oluşturmuştur. Bu çalışmada geliştirilen iterasyon belirleme algoritması Kesikli Eşlenik Gradyent (Truncated Conjugate Gradient, TCG), Çift Eşlenik Gradyent (Bi-Conjugate Gradient) ve Transpozu Olmadan Kısmen Minimum Rezidüel (Transpose Free Quasi Minimal Residual, TFQMR) algoritmalarına entegre edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEVİM, G., ÜNCÜ, Y. A., CANPOLAT, M. (2021). An Alternative Method for Determining the Iteration Number for Reconstruction Algorithms Used in Diffuse Optical Tomography Systems. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 246–258. https://ajindex.com/articles/260804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. S. Sabir, S. Cho, D. Heo, K. Hyun Kim, S. Cho, and R. Pua, “Data-specific mask-guided image reconstruction for diffuse optical tomography,” Applied Optics, 59, 9328-9339, 2020
  2. J. Yoo et al., “Deep Learning Diffuse Optical Tomography,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 39(4), 877-887, 2020
  3. E. Y. Chae et al., “Development of digital breast tomosynthesis and diffuse optical tomography fusion imaging for breast cancer detection,” Scientific Reports, 10(1), 13127, 2020
  4. A. P. Gibson, J. C. Hebden, and S. R. Arridge, “Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, 50(4), R1-43, 2005
  5. D. A. Benaron and D. K. Stevenson, “Optical time-of-flight and absorbance imaging of biologic media,” Science, 259(5100), 1463–1466, 1993
  6. B. W. Pogue and M. S. Patterson, “Frequency-domain optical absorption spectroscopy of finite tissue volumes using diffusion theory,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, 39(7), 1157–1180, 1994
  7. A. Siegel, J. J. Marota, and D. Boas, “Design and evaluation of a continuous-wave diffuse optical tomography system,” Optics Express, 4(8), 287, 1999
  8. S. L. Jacques, “Optical properties of biological tissues: A review,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, 58(11), R37, 2013
  9. Y. Hoshi and Y. Yamada, “Overview of diffuse optical tomography and its clinical applications,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, 21(9), 091312, 2016
  10. R. C. Haskell, L. O. Svaasand, T.-T. Tsay, T.-C. Feng, B. J. Tromberg, and M. S. McAdams, “Boundary conditions for the diffusion equation in radiative transfer,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11(10), 2727-2741, 1994
  11. T. Durduran, R. Choe, W. B. Baker, and A. G. Yodh, “Diffuse optics for tissue monitoring and tomography,” Reports on Progress in Physics, 73(7), 076701, 2010
  12. R. J. Gaudette et al., “A comparison study of linear reconstruction techniques for diffuse optical tomographic imaging of absorption coefficient,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, 45(4), 1051, 2000
  13. T. Mercan, G. Sevim, Y. A. Üncü, U. Serkan, H. Ö. Kazancı, and M. Canpolat, “The Comparison of Reconstruction Algorithms for Diffuse Optical Tomography,” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, 14(2), 285–295, 2019
  14. G. Sevim, T. Mercan, Y. A. Uncu, and M. Canpolat, “A new reconstruction technique used in Diffuse Optical Tomography System,” 2017 21st National Biomedical Engineering Meeting (BIYOMUT), IEEE, 2018, pp. i-iv
  15. G. Sevim, “Difüz optik