Journals / Bee Studies / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Climate Change Prompts Monitoring and Systematic Utilization of Honey Bee Diversity in Turkey

Pages
19–25
Publication Date
2020-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Here we provide a framework that takes genomic diversity into account for assessing and monitoring various aspects of species’ response to climate change which can potentially lead to drastic impacts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Quantitative studies concerning the impact of climate change on pollinators are generally lacking.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Relationship between honey bee diversity, present local adaptations and adaptive capacity of subspecies and ecotypes in the face of climate change is an urgent but rather poorly studied topic worldwide.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Here we provide a framework that takes genomic diversity into account for assessing and monitoring various aspects of species’ response to climate change which can potentially lead to drastic impacts.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Global change · adaptive capacity · Long-term monitoring

Abstract

Quantitative studies concerning the impact of climate change on pollinators are generally lacking. Relationship between honey bee diversity, present local adaptations and adaptive capacity of subspecies and ecotypes in the face of climate change is an urgent but rather poorly studied topic worldwide. Actually, such an effort lies at the crossroads of various fields of inquiry. Those include conservation of local honey bee diversity, breeding various local stocks for desirable traits, and enabling resilient ecosystem services. With the ever-increasing availability of genomic tools, now it is more probable than ever to simultaneously fill such gaps. Current knowledge and growing awareness on honey bee diversity in Turkey let us progress into a more systematic utilization of this resource through development of climate-conscious models. Here we provide a framework that takes genomic diversity into account for assessing and monitoring various aspects of species’ response to climate change which can potentially lead to drastic impacts.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜKRER, M., BİLGİN, C. C. (2020). Climate Change Prompts Monitoring and Systematic Utilization of Honey Bee Diversity in Turkey. Bee Studies, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 19–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/259502

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aykanat, T., Lindqvist, M., Pritchard, V. L., & Primmer, C. R. (2016). From population genomics to conservation and management: a workflow for targeted analysis of markers identified using genome‐wide approaches in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Journal of Fish Biology, 89, 2658-2679. doi:10.1111/jfb.13149 Beekman, M., Allsopp, M. H., Wossler, T. C., & Oldroyd, B. P. (2008). Factors affecting the dynamics of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) hybrid zone of South Africa. Heredity, 100(1), 13–18. http://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6801058
  2. Bilgin, C. C. & Türkeş, M. (2008). Turkey Country Report. In: R. Laušević, L. Jones-Walters, A. Nieto & A. Torre-Marín (Eds.), Climate change and biodiversity in South-East Europe: a concise summary of the scientific and policy context, issues and recommended actions (pp. 50-55).
  3. REC, Szentendre, Hungary; ECNC, Tilburg, the Netherlands Bilgin, C. C. (2013). Türkiye’nin doğası iklim değişikliğinden nasıl etkilenecek? ODTÜ SEM Dönem Arası Seminerleri, 29-31 Ocak 2013,
  4. Ankara.
  5. Chen, C., Liu, Z., Pan, Q., Chen, X., Wang, H., Guo, H.,. & Shi, W. (2016). Genomic analyses reveal demographic history and temperate adaptation of the newly discovered honey bee subspecies Apis mellifera sinisxinyuan n. ssp. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33(5), 1337-1348.
  6. Coroian, C. O., Muñoz, I., Schlüns, E. A., Paniti‐Teleky, O. R., Erler, S., Furdui, E. M.,. & Moritz, R. F. (2014). Climate rather than geography separates two European honey bee subspecies. Molecular Ecology, 23(9), 2353-2361. COST Committee of Senior Officials, (2018). Memorandum of Understanding for the implementation of the COST Action “Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems” (G-BIKE) CA18134. https://e-services.cost.eu/files/domain_files/CA/Action_CA18134/mou/CA18134-e.pdf
  7. Cridland, J. M., Tsutsui, N. D., & Ramírez, S. R. (2017). The Complex Demographic History and Evolutionary Origin of the Western Honey Bee, Apis mellifera. Genome Biology and Evolution, 9(2), 457-472.
  8. De la Rua, P., Jaffé, R., Dall'Olio, R., Muñoz, I., & Serrano, J. (2009). Biodiversity, conservation and current threats to European honey bees. Apidologie, 40(3), 263-284. De la Rúa, P., Jaffé, R., Muñoz, I., Serrano, J., Moritz, R. F. A., & Kraus, F. B. (2013). Conserving genetic diversity in the honeybee: Comments on Harpur et al. (2012). Molecular Ecology, 22, 3208-3210. doi:10.1111/mec.12333 Espregueira, G., Rey-Iglesia, A., Robles Tascón, L., Jensen, A. B., da Fonseca, R., & Campos, P. F. (202