Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Development and Life Types of Parasitic Flowering Plants

Parazit Çiçekli Bitkilerin Gelişimi ve Hayat Tipleri

Pages
9–16
Publication Date
2014-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Parasitic plants were grouped by holo and hemiparasite previously depending on host cell dependencies but due to new ndings, they have been grouped again.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Parasitic owering plants, occupied an important place in the kingdom of plants, have been interesting for researchers because they have different features.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Parasitic owering plants represent about 1% of angiosperms plants in bio-diversity of the earth and they have got 22 angiosperm family and 270 genera, consequently have got approximately 4,000 parasitic owering plant species.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Parasitic plants were grouped by holo and hemiparasite previously depending on host cell dependencies but due to new ndings, they have been grouped again.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Parazit çiçekli bitkiler · havstoryum · angiosperm

Abstract

Parasitic owering plants, occupied an important place in the kingdom of plants, have been interesting for researchers because they have different features. These plants have been classi ed in a very simple manner; however developments in the science of biology requires re-classi cation. Not only morphological and anatomical features but also differences in physiology and life cycle stages should be taken into account for re- classi cation. Parasitic owering plants represent about 1% of angiosperms plants in bio-diversity of the earth and they have got 22 angiosperm family and 270 genera, consequently have got approximately 4,000 parasitic owering plant species. The main distinguishing feature of parasitic owering plants is their “haustorium” which is plant parts for attachment to their hosts and penetration to host’s xylem and oem. Discovery and investigation of haustorium structure caused re-classi cation of some heterotrophic plants which were previously described as parasitic plants. Host plants are very important for completion of the parasitic plants life cycle. Parasitic-host plants interactions support seed germination, haustorium formation, nutrition types and selection of host. Different biochemical stimulant molecules are effective on these important processes. Parasitic plants were grouped by holo and hemiparasite previously depending on host cell dependencies but due to new ndings, they have been grouped again.

Özet

Bitkiler âleminde önemli bir yeri işgal eden parazit çiçekli bitkiler, sahip oldukları farklı özelliklerden dolayı araştırıcıların ilgisini çekmişlerdir. Son yıllara kadar basit bir şekilde gruplandırılan bu bitkiler, biyoloji bilimindeki gelişmeler ışığında tekrar araştırılmaktadır. Morfolojik ve anatomik özelliklerinin yanı sıra zyolojileri ve hayat döngülerinin bazı aşamalarındaki farklılıklar yeniden dikkate alınan özelliklerdir. Yeryüzünün biyolojik çeşitliliğinde parazit çiçekli bitkiler, angiospermlerin yaklaşık %1’ini kapsar ve 22 angiosperm familyasında 20 cins ile yaklaşık 4000 bitki türüne sahiptir. Parazit çiçekli bitkilerin başlıca ayırt edici özelliği; konukçularına tutunmayı ve beslenmeyi sağlayan havstoryumlarıdır. Havstoryum yapılarının keş ve incelenmesi daha önce parazit bitkiler olarak tanımlanan birçok hetetro k bitki türünün farklı gruplarda değerlendirilmesine neden olmuştur. Parazit bitkilerin hayat döngülerinin tamamlanmasında konukçu organizmalar oldukça önemlidir. Tohum çimlenmesinden havstoryum oluşumuna, beslenme şekillerinden konukçu seçimine kadar birçok özelliğin konukçu- parazit arasındaki ilişkilere dayandığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca konukçu organizmalardan salınan farklı biyokimyasal uyarıcıların da parazit çiçekli bitkilerin gelişiminde etkili olduğu bulunmuştur. Konukçuya bağımlılıklarına göre parazit bitkiler önceleri tam ve yarı parazit olarak gruplandırılmışsa da elde edilen yeni bulgularla daha detaylı bir gruplandırma yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜRMEN, B., KUTBAY, H. G., YILMAZ, H. (2014). Development and Life Types of Parasitic Flowering Plants. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 9–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/257632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Atsatt, P.R., 1977. The insect herbivore as a predictive model in parasitic seed plan biology. American Naturalist, 111:579-586.
  2. Barlow, B.A., Wiens, D., 1977. Host-parasite resemblence in Australian mistletoes: the case for cryptic mimicry. Evolution 31: 69-84.
  3. Bidartondo, M.I., 2005. The evolutionary ecology of myco- heterotrophy. New Phytologist, 167: 335–352.
  4. Bjorkmann, E., 1960. Monotropa hypopitys L, an epiparasite on tree roots. Physiologia Plantarum,13:308-327.
  5. Bouwmeester, H.J., Matusova, R., Zhongkui, S., Beale, M.H., 2003. Secondary metabolite signalling in host-parasitic plant interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 6: 358-364.
  6. De Laubenfels, D.J., 1972. Flore de la Nouvelle Caledonia et Dependances. No. 4. gymnospermes. Muséum national d`histoire naturelle, Paris. Furman, T.E.,Trappe, J.M., 1971. Phylogeny and ecology of mycotrophic achlorophyllous angiosperms. Quarterly Review Biology,46: 219-225.
  7. Hull, R.J.,Leonard, O.A., 1964. Physiological aspects of parasitism in mistletoes (Arceuthobium and Phoradendron). 2. The photosynthetic capacity of mistletoes. Plant Physiology,39: 1008-1017. Köpke, E., Musselman, L.J., De Laubenfels, D.J., 1981. Studies on the anatomy of Parasitaxus ustus and its root connections. Phytomoroptamgy, 31:85-92.
  8. Kuijt, J., 1963. On the ecology and parasitism of the Costa Rican tree mistletoe, Gaiadendron punctatum (Ruiz and Pavón) G. Don. Canadian Journalof Botany,41: 927-938.
  9. Kuijt, J., 1969. The Biology of Parasitic Flowering Plants. University of California Press,
  10. Berkeley, CA. Kuo, J., Pate, J.S., 1990. Anatomy and ultrastructure of haustoria in selected West Australian parasitic angiosperms. In: Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress for Electron Microscopy. San Francisco Press, San Francisco, pp 690-691.
  11. Kuo, J., Pate, J.S., Davidson, N.J., 1989. Ultrstructure of the haustorial interface and apoplastic continuum between host and the root hemi-parasites Olax phyllanthi (Labill.) R. Br. (Olacaceae). Protoplasma, 150:27-39.
  12. Lynn, D.G., Steffens, J.C., Kamut, V.S., Graden, D.W., Shabonowitz, J., Riopel, J.L., 1981. Isolation and characterization of the rst host recognition substances for parasitic angiosperms. Journal of the American. Cyarıcal Society, 103:1868-1870.
  13. Machado, M.A., Zetsche, K., 1990. A structural, functional and molecular analysis of plastids of the tamparsites Cuscuta re exa and Cuscuta europaea. Planta,181: 91-96.
  14. Main, A., 1947. Arti cial propagation of Nuytsia oribunda. Wester