Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation and Comparison of Some Parameters in Four Garlic Varieties

Pages
1866–1875
Publication Date
2019-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that Turkish variety had the highest TA (1.21%), TSS (36.80%) and AA (62.58% I) and the highest DM was obtained from French variety.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research is aimed to determine the variation and identification of some morphological and biochemical parameters among different garlic varieties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is possible to say that varieties were significantly different on the basis of all morphological characters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that Turkish variety had the highest TA (1.21%), TSS (36.80%) and AA (62.58% I) and the highest DM was obtained from French variety.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Garlic · bulb · morphologic character

Abstract

This research is aimed to determine the variation and identification of some morphological and biochemical parameters among different garlic varieties. In this research, three foreign hardneck (French, Spanish, Chinese) and one Turkish softneck garlic varieties have been studied. The investigated traits are included the bulb and clove weight, clove height, number of clove/bulb, color values (L, a, b), pH, titratable acidity (TA), total soluble solids (TSS), dry matter (DM), total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity (AA). It is possible to say that varieties were significantly different on the basis of all morphological characters. The results indicated that Turkish variety had the highest TA (1.21%), TSS (36.80%) and AA (62.58% I) and the highest DM was obtained from French variety. Meanwhile, Spanish and Chinese varieties have higher L values (88.15 and 87.24) than others. On the other hand the highest level of TPC (32.17 mg GAE g-1 FW-1) was found in Chinese variety. In accordance with correlation analysis, there was a statistically significant correlation between TSS and TA, and also TPC was significantly correlated with pH and TA (p≤0.05). The result will be helpful for the future studies to understand the similarities and differences of this 4 varieties of morphological and biochemical properties. This study will be good to repeat the experiment at multi variations grown worldwide. However, further studies should be done in this respect in the coming years.

Özet

This research is aimed to determine the variation and identification of some morphological and biochemical parameters among different garlic varieties. In this research, three foreign hardneck (French, Spanish, Chinese) and one Turkish softneck garlic varieties have been studied. The investigated traits are included the bulb and clove weight, clove height, number of clove/bulb, color values (L, a, b), pH, titratable acidity (TA), total soluble solids (TSS), dry matter (DM), total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity (AA). It is possible to say that varieties were significantly different on the basis of all morphological characters. The results indicated that Turkish variety had the highest TA (1.21%), TSS (36.80%) and AA (62.58% I) and the highest DM was obtained from French variety. Meanwhile, Spanish and Chinese varieties have higher L values (88.15 and 87.24) than others. On the other hand the highest level of TPC (32.17 mg GAE g-1 FW-1) was found in Chinese variety. In accordance with correlation analysis, there was a statistically significant correlation between TSS and TA, and also TPC was significantly correlated with pH and TA (p≤0.05). The result will be helpful for the future studies to understand the similarities and differences of this 4 varieties of morphological and biochemical properties. This study will be good to repeat the experiment at multi variations grown worldwide. However, further studies should be done in this respect in the coming years.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAN, S. (2019). Evaluation and Comparison of Some Parameters in Four Garlic Varieties. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 1866–1875. https://ajindex.com/articles/257426

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akan S, 2016. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging and methyl jasmonate treatment on postharvest physiology of Taşköprü Garlic. Ankara University, Agriculture Faculty (published) PhD thesis,164p. Akan S, Tuna Gunes N, Yanmaz R, 2019. Methyl jasmonate and low temperature can help for keeping some physicochemical quality parameters in garlic (Allium sativum L.) cloves. Food Chemistry, 270: 546–553. Anonymous, 1997. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2288/97 of 18 November 1997 Laying down marketing standards for garlic. Official Journal, 315: 3–6. Anonymus, 2018. 400 Million Pounds of Garlic Grown in U.S. Annually. https://aghires.com/garlic-facts/. (access date: 20th February, 2019). AOAC, 1984. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc., Arlington, VA. Artik N, Poyrazoglu ES, 1994. Kastamonu sarımsağının (Allium sativum L.) kimyasal bileşiminin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Gıda Teknoloji Derneği Dergisi, 19(1): 3–9.
  2. Baghalian K, Ziai SA, Naghavi MR, Naghdi Badi H, Khalighi A, 2005. Evaluation of allicin content and botanical traits in ıranian garlic (Allium sativum L.) Ecotypes. Scientia Horticulturea, 103: 155–166.
  3. Beato VM, Orgaz F, Mansilla F, Montaño A, 2011. Changes in phenolic compounds in garlic (Allium sativum L.) owing to the cultivar and location of growth. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 66: 218–223.
  4. Benke AP, Dukare S, Mahajan V, Singh M, 2018. Genetic divergence studies for bulbing and related traits in garlic germplasm during kharif season. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(1): 2920–27.
  5. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C, 1995. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 28: 25–30.
  6. Bozin B, Minica-Dukic N, Samojlik I, Giran A, Igic I, 2008. Phenolics as antioxidants in garlic (Allium sativum L., Alliaceae). Food Chemistry, 111(4): 925–929.
  7. Chen S, Shen X, Cheng S, Li P, Du J, Chang Y, Meng H, 2013. Evaluation of garlic cultivars for polyphenolic content and antioxidant properties. Plos One, 8(11): 1–12.
  8. Dronachari M, Venkatachalapathy K, Rajashekarappa K, 2010. Effect of pretreatments and packaging on shelf life of peeled garlic cloves. Jornal of Dairying Foods & Home Science, 29(2):130-135.
  9. Etoh T, Simon PW, 2002. Diversity, fertility and seed production of garlic. In: Rabinowitch H.D. and Currah L. (eds) Allium Crop Science – Recent Advances. CAB