SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 4

The Effect of Learning Cycle Model on the Achievements and Retention Levels of Pre-Service Science Teachers in Seed-Fruit- Flower Topics

Öğrenme Halkası Modelinin Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Tohum-Meyve-Çiçek Konularındaki Başarılarına ve Hatırlama Düzeylerine Etkisi

Yasemin HARURLUOĞLU
Ercan KAYA
Pages
43–50
Publication Date
2011-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After 4 weeks from the applications,Conceptual Understanding Test was applied to determine the retention level as retention test once again.In the results of analysis of the data obtained it was found that learning cycle model had an statistically importanteffect on pre-service teachers’ achievement and retention level about seed, fruit and flower topics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the effects of learning cycle model on the achievements andretention levels of pre-service science teachers in seed-fruit-flower topics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study consisted of38 pre-service teachers studying in the second class in Science Education, Kazım Karabekir Faculty of Education,Atatürk University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After 4 weeks from the applications,Conceptual Understanding Test was applied to determine the retention level as retention test once again.In the results of analysis of the data obtained it was found that learning cycle model had an statistically importanteffect on pre-service teachers’ achievement and retention level about seed, fruit and flower topics.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öğrenme halkası modeli · tohum · meyve

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the effects of learning cycle model on the achievements andretention levels of pre-service science teachers in seed-fruit-flower topics. The sample of the study consisted of38 pre-service teachers studying in the second class in Science Education, Kazım Karabekir Faculty of Education,Atatürk University. In the study, pre test-post test control group model was used. Subjects processed with teachercenteredmethods in the control group and processed according to learning cycle model of the contructivist learningapproach in the experimental group. Test was applied as pre-test and post-test two times. After 4 weeks from the applications,Conceptual Understanding Test was applied to determine the retention level as retention test once again.In the results of analysis of the data obtained it was found that learning cycle model had an statistically importanteffect on pre-service teachers’ achievement and retention level about seed, fruit and flower topics.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, öğrenme halkası modelinin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının tohum-meyve-çiçek konularındaki başarılarına ve hatırlama düzeylerine etkisinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemini Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Fen Bilgisi Öğretmenliği Anabilim Dalı 2. sınıfında öğrenim gören toplam 38 öğretmen adayı oluşturmuştur. Araştırmada ön test-son test kontrol gruplu model kullanılmıştır. Kontrol grubunda dersler öğretmen merkezli yöntemlerle, deney grubunda ise yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımının öğrenme halkası modeline göre işlenmiştir. Test, ön test ve son test olarak iki kez uygulanmıştır. Uygulamalardan 4 hafta sonra kavramsal anlama testi, kalıcılık testi olarak hatırlama düzeylerini tespit amacıyla bir kez daha uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen verilerin analizi sonucunda öğrenme halkası modelinin öğretmen adaylarının tohum, meyve ve çiçek konularındaki başarılarına ve hatırlama düzeylerine istatistikî olarak anlamlı etki ettiği tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

HARURLUOĞLU, Y., KAYA, E. (2011). The Effect of Learning Cycle Model on the Achievements and Retention Levels of Pre-Service Science Teachers in Seed-Fruit- Flower Topics. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 4, 43–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/257336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abraham, M. R., Renner, J.W., 1986. The sequence of learning cycle activities in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 23(2): 121-143.
  2. Akpınar, E., Ergin, Ö., 2005. Yapılandırmacılıkta kurama dayalı fen öğretimine yönelik bir uygulama. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eği- tim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), 29, 9-17.
  3. Atay, P.D., Tekkaya, C., 2008. Promoting students’ learning in gene- tics with the learning cycle. The Journal of Experimental Edu- cation, 76 (3): 259-280.
  4. Ateş, S., Polat, M., 2005. Elektrik devreleri konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesinde öğrenme evreleri metodunun et- kisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 39- 47. Atılboz, N.G., 2007. Öğrenme halkası modelinin biyoloji öğret- men adaylarının difüzyon ve osmoz konularını öğrenmeleri- ni, biyoloji öğretimine yönelik özyeterlik inançları ve tutum- ları üzerine etkileri. Doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi,
  5. Ankara.
  6. Ayas, A., 1995. Fen Bilimlerinde Program Geliştirme ve Uygulama Teknikleri Üzerine Bir Çalışma: İki Çağdaş Yaklaşımın De- ğerlendirilmesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Der- gisi, 11, 149–155.
  7. Barman, C.R., 1992. An evaluation of the use of a technique desig- ned to assist prospective elementary teachers use the learning cycle with science textbooks. School Science and Mathema- tics, ProQuest Education Journals, 92(2): 59-63.
  8. Barman, C.R., Barman, N.S., Miller, J.A., 1996. Two teaching met- hods and students’s understanding of sound. School Science and Mathematics. 96(2): 63-67.
  9. Bergman, D.J., 2008. Bug talk: A learning module on insect com- munication. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curri- culum Ideas, 45 (2): 29-34.
  10. Bevevino, M.M., Dengel, J., Adams, K., 1999. Constructivist theory in the classroom: Internalizing concepts through inquiry lear- ning. Clearing House, 72 (5): 275-278.
  11. Bleicher, R.E., Lindgren, J., 2005. Success in science learning and preservice science teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Science Education, 16, 205-225.
  12. Body, N., Watson, K., Aubusson, P., 2003. A Trial of the five es: a referant model for constructivist teaching and learning rese- arch in science education, 33, 27-42.
  13. Brown, F.S., 1996. The effect of an inquiry-oriented environmen- tal science course on preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes about science. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO. Bybee, R.W., 1997. Achieving scientific literacy: from pu