Journals / Journal of Life Economics / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

DETERMINING OF LOGISTICS PROGRAM STUDENTS INTERNSHIP PLACE SELECTION BY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

LOJİSTİK BÖLÜMÜ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN STAJ YERİ SEÇİMİNİN ANALİTİK HİYERARŞİ PROSESİ (AHP) YARDIMIYLA TESPİT EDİLMESİ

Pages
235–254
Publication Date
2016-10-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After that, alternatives is determined, and right internship place selection is tried to determine by AHP technique steps implementation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Internship training is obliged to undergraduate students by schools for practicing the academic knowledge that learned during education in working conditions, before to get a start in business.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This obligation have revealed the necessity of true internship place selection for get a good internship training, and complete the internship training in which area they want to work after the 236 education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After that, alternatives is determined, and right internship place selection is tried to determine by AHP technique steps implementation
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi(AHP) · Lojistik · Staj

Abstract

Internship training is obliged to undergraduate students by schools for practicing the academic knowledge that learned during education in working conditions, before to get a start in business. This obligation have revealed the necessity of true internship place selection for get a good internship training, and complete the internship training in which area they want to work after the 236 education. In this research we tried to determine the right internship place selection for students of Logistics Program by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) multi-criteria decision making technique. In the process of implementation of the problem, firstly the aim of the problem is determined, and the criterias that affect the problem is selected. After that, alternatives is determined, and right internship place selection is tried to determine by AHP technique steps implementation

Özet

Lisans öğrencilerinin okul öğrenimi süresince almış oldukları akademik bilginin iş hayatına başlamadan önce iş yeri çalışma koşullarında uygulamalı olarak tecrübe edinebilmesi için okullar tarafından öğrencilere staj eğitimi alma zorunluluğu getirilmiştir. Bu zorunluluk beraberinde öğrencinin iyi bir staj eğitimi alması ve çalışmak istediği alanda staj eğitimini tamamlaması için doğru staj yerinin seçme gerekliliğini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Lojistik bölümü öğrencilerinin doğru alanda staj eğitimini yapmalarına yardımcı olmak için staj yeri seçim problemi ele alınarak Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) çok kriterli karar verme tekniği yardımıyla doğru staj yeri tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Problemin uygulanmasında öncelikli olarak problemin amacı ortaya koyularak amacı etkileyen kriterler tespit edilmiştir. Sonraki aşamada alternatifler tespit edilerek AHP tekniği adımlarının uygulanması ile doğru staj yeri tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCEKAYA, P., GÜROL, P., Kara, K. (2016). DETERMINING OF LOGISTICS PROGRAM STUDENTS INTERNSHIP PLACE SELECTION BY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP). Journal of Life Economics, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 235–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/2570

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abalı, Y.A., Kutlu, B.S., Eren, T. (2012) "Çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemleri ile bursiyer seçimi: Bir öğretim kurumunda uygulama", Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26 (3-4), 259-272.
  2. Adıgüzel, O., Çetintürk, İ., Er, O. (2009) "Konaklama işletmelerine olan müşteri tercihinin analitik hiyerarşi prosesi yöntemi ile belirlenmesi", Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 1(1), 17-35.
  3. Ahire, S.L., Rana, D.S. (1995) "Selection of TQM pilot projects using an MCDM approach", İnternational Journal of Quality &Reliability Management, 12(1), 61-81.
  4. Al Harbi, K.M. (2001) "Application of AHP in project management", International Journal of Project Management, 19(4), 19-27
  5. Al Khalil, M.I. (2002) "Selecting the appropriate delivery method using AHP", International Journal of Project Management, 20, 469-474.
  6. Bahurmoz, A.M.A. (2003) "The analytic hierarchy process at Dar El-Hekma Saudi Arabia", Interfaces, 33 (4), 70-78.
  7. Bard, J.F. (1986) "A multiobjective methodology for selecting subsystem automation option", Management Science, 32(12), 1628-1641.
  8. Beebe, A., Blaylock, A., Sweetser, K.D. (2009) "Job satisfaction in public relations internship", Public Relations Rewiev, 35, 156-158.
  9. Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioğlu, O., Nebol, E. (2008) "Selection of strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain", International Journal of Production Economics, 113 (1), 148- 158. Byun, D.H. (2001) "The AHP approach for selecting an automobile puurchase model", Information and Management, 38(5), 289-297.
  10. Chen, T.L., Shen, C.C. (2012) "Today's intern tomorrow's practitioner? The influence of intership programme's on students' career development in the hospitally industry", Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 11, 29-40.
  11. Cheng, C.H. (1997) "Evaulating naval tactical missile system by Fuzzy AHP based on grade value of membership function", International Journal of Operation Research, 96 (2), 343-350.
  12. Dyer, J. (2005) "Multiattribute Utility Theory(MAUT)", in Figuera, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (Eds.), Multiple Crirteria Decision Analysis: State of The Art Surveys, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 265-295.
  13. Ferrari, P. (2002) "A method for choosing from among alternative transportation projects", International Journal of Operation Research, 150, 194-203.
  14. Garcia-Cascales, M.S., Lamata, M.T. (2009) "Selection of a cleaning system for engine maintanance based on the analytic hierarchy process", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56, 1442-1451.
  15. Garfi, M., Tondell