Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

The Response of CO2 Flux to Soil Warming, Manure Application and Soil Salinity

Pages
1334–1342
Publication Date
2019-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Soil CO2 flux were affected by gradually increasing of temperature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research effect of different soil types (normal and saline), farmyard manure norms (2 ton/ha - 4 ton/ha), manure application techniques (surface and subsurface) and soil temperature levels (20-25°C, 25-30°C, 30-35°C, 35-40°C, 40-45°C and 45-50°C) were examined of the soil CO2 flux on the pots at the laboratory conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to obtained results, soil type (ST), manure norm (MN), manure application technique (MAT) and soil temperature (T) values changed CO2 flux.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Soil CO2 flux were affected by gradually increasing of temperature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:CO2 flux · farmyard manure · saline soil

Abstract

In this research effect of different soil types (normal and saline), farmyard manure norms (2 ton/ha - 4 ton/ha), manure application techniques (surface and subsurface) and soil temperature levels (20-25°C, 25-30°C, 30-35°C, 35-40°C, 40-45°C and 45-50°C) were examined of the soil CO2 flux on the pots at the laboratory conditions. According to obtained results, soil type (ST), manure norm (MN), manure application technique (MAT) and soil temperature (T) values changed CO2 flux. CO2 flux value of saline soil condition smaller than the normal soil condition. As an expected result, increased the manure amount increased the CO2 flux from soil to atmosphere. However, CO2 flux on the condition that subsurface manure application was less than surface manure application. CO2 flux values at the high soil temperatures were more than low soil temperature conditions. According to the interaction (T*ST, T*MN and T*MAT) results were not statistically significant. Soil CO2 flux were affected by gradually increasing of temperature.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTIKAT, S., KUCUKERDEM, H. K., ALTIKAT, A. (2019). The Response of CO2 Flux to Soil Warming, Manure Application and Soil Salinity. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 1334–1342. https://ajindex.com/articles/256775

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akinremi OO, McGinn SM, McLean HDJ, 1999. Effects of soil temperature and moisture on soil respiration in barley and fallow plots. Cananadian Journal of Soil Science, 79: 5–13.
  2. Daverede IC, Kravchenko AN, Hoeft RG, Nafziger ED, Bullock DG, Warren JJ, Gonzini LC, 2004. Phosphorus runoff from incorporated and surface applied liquid swine manure and phosphorus manure. Journal of Environmental Quality, 33: 1535 – 1544. Davidson EA, Trumbore SE, Amundson R, 2000. Biogeochemistry: soil warming and organic carbon content. Nature, 408: 789-790.
  3. Ding W, Yu H, Cai Z, Han F, Xu Z, 2010. Responses of soil respiration to N fertilization in a loamy soil under maize cultivation. Geoderma, 155: 381–389.
  4. Eghball B, Mielke LN, Calvo GA, Wilhelm WW, 1993. Fractal description of soil fragmentation for various tillage methods and crop sequences. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57:1337–1341.
  5. Fang C, Moncrieff JB, 2001. The dependence of soil CO2 efflux on temperature. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33: 155–165.
  6. Fangueiro D, Senbayran M, Trindade H, Chadwick D, 2008. Cattle slurry treatment by screw press separation and chemically enhanced settling: effect on greenhouse gas emissions after land spreading and grass yield. Bioresource Technology, 99: 7132 – 7142. Fender AC, Gansert D, Jungkunst HF, Fiedler S, Beyer F, Schutzenmeister K, Thiele B, Valtanen K, Polle A, Leuschner C, 2013. Root-induced tree species effects on the source/sink strength for greenhouse gases (CH4, N2O and CO2) of a temperate deciduous forest soil. Soil Biol Biochemistry, 57: 587–597. Franzluebbers AJ, 2002. Soil organic matter stratification ratio as an indicator of soil quality. Soil and Tillage Research, 66(2): 95-106.
  7. Houska T, Kraus D, Kiese R, Breuer L, 2017. Constraining a complex biogeochemical model for CO2 and N2O emission simulations from various land uses by model-data fusion. Biogeosciences, 14 (14): 3487–3508. IPCC, 2001. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, Volume 4: Agriculture, forestry and other land use, chapter 10 emissions from livestock and manure management, on line at http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/ pdf/4_Volume4/V4_10_Ch10_Livestock.pdf (accessed at 10/06/2013).
  8. Jassal RS, Black TA, Drewitt GB, Novak, MD, Gaumont-Guay D, Nesic Z, 2004. A model of the production and transport of CO2 in soil: predicting soil CO2 concentrations and CO2 efflux from a forest floor. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 124:219– 236. Kirschbaum MUF, 1995. The temper