SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

DNA Barcoding And Species Delimitation Of Pyrausta (Lepidoptera: Crambidae, Pyraustinae) With Some Populations In Turkey

Sibel KIZILDAĞ
Pages
1489–1496
Publication Date
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For understanding the importance of the phylogenetic species concept in species delimitation, was reviewed cladistic topology and genetic distances of Pyrausta species with new data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pyrausta aurata (Scopoli, 1763), P. despicata (Scopoli, 1763), P. sanguinalis (Linnaeus, 1767), P. castalis (Treitschke, 1829), P. pavidalis (Zerny in Osthelder, 1935) and P. gulpembe (Kemal & Koçak, 2018) from Turkey were first time barcoded in the present study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turkish populations and new species P. tatarica (Kemal, Kızıldağ & Koçak, 2020) were evaluated the phylogenetic positions with other Pyrausta species and populations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For understanding the importance of the phylogenetic species concept in species delimitation, was reviewed cladistic topology and genetic distances of Pyrausta species with new data.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Pyrausta · barcoding · phylogeny

Abstract

Pyrausta aurata (Scopoli, 1763), P. despicata (Scopoli, 1763), P. sanguinalis (Linnaeus, 1767), P. castalis (Treitschke, 1829), P. pavidalis (Zerny in Osthelder, 1935) and P. gulpembe (Kemal & Koçak, 2018) from Turkey were first time barcoded in the present study. Turkish populations and new species P. tatarica (Kemal, Kızıldağ & Koçak, 2020) were evaluated the phylogenetic positions with other Pyrausta species and populations. In the phylogenetic tree based on the mtCOI gene region delimitation of species and populations constructed with Neighbor-joining, Bayesian inference, and maximum-likelihood algorithms. For understanding the importance of the phylogenetic species concept in species delimitation, was reviewed cladistic topology and genetic distances of Pyrausta species with new data.

Özet

Pyrausta aurata (Scopoli, 1763), P. despicata (Scopoli, 1763), P. sanguinalis (Linnaeus, 1767), P. castalis (Treitschke, 1829), P. pavidalis (Zerny in Osthelder, 1935) and P. gulpembe (Kemal & Koçak, 2018) from Turkey were first time barcoded in the present study. Turkish populations and new species P. tatarica (Kemal, Kızıldağ & Koçak, 2020) were evaluated the phylogenetic positions with other Pyrausta species and populations. In the phylogenetic tree based on the mtCOI gene region delimitation of species and populations constructed with Neighbor-joining, Bayesian inference, and maximum-likelihood algorithms. For understanding the importance of the phylogenetic species concept in species delimitation, was reviewed cladistic topology and genetic distances of Pyrausta species with new data.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZILDAĞ, S. (2021). DNA Barcoding And Species Delimitation Of Pyrausta (Lepidoptera: Crambidae, Pyraustinae) With Some Populations In Turkey. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 1489–1496. https://ajindex.com/articles/256525

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Anonymous, 2020a. Barcode Of Life Data System. http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php. (Date of access: 9 May 2020). Anonymous, 2020b. Global information system on pyraloidea. http://www.pyraloidea.org. (Date of access: 9 May 2020). Anonymous, 2020c. National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov /nuccore/?term=Pyrausta. (Date of access: 9 May 2020).
  2. Chen K, Zhang D, Stănescu M. 2018. Revision of the genus Eumorphobotys with descriptions of two new species (Lepidoptera, Crambidae, Pyraustinae). Zootaxa, 4472 (3): 489–504.
  3. Kemal M, Yıldız İ, Kızıldağ S, Uçak H, Koçak, AÖ. 2018. Taxonomical and molecular evaluation of Apochima agassiz in East Turkey, with a description of a new genus (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Ennominae). Miscellaneous Papers, 169: 1–14.
  4. Kemal M, Koçak A. 2018. Vernal aspect of the Lepidoptera from Nemrut Mountain and the vicinity of Karadut in the Kahta district with a description of a new species (SE Turkey, Adıyaman Province). Miscellaneous Papers, 174:1–22.
  5. Kemal M, Kızıldağ S, Koçak A. 2020. Description of a new Pyrausta species from East Turkey with comments about related species (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea). Miscellaneous Papers, 210: 1–5. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16: 111–120. Maes K V N. 2002. On the systematic position of some Palaearctic Pyraustinae (Pyraloidea, Crambidae). Nota Lepidopterologica, 24 (4):51 –57. Mally R, Hayden JE, Neinhuis C, Jordal BH, Nuss M. 2019. The phylogenetic systematics of Spilomelinae and Pyraustinae (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae) inferred from DNA and morphology. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny, 77(1): 141–204.
  6. Patwardhan A, Ray S, Roy A. 2014. Molecular Markers in Phylogenetic Studies – A Review. Journal of Phylogenetics & Evolutionary Biology, 2: 131. Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology Evolution, 25 (7):1253–1256.
  7. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572–1574. Shodotova AA. 2011. New Species of the Genus Pyrausta (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) from Southern Siberia and Transcaucasia. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 90 (4): 505–512. Silva-Brandão KL, Lyra ML, Freitas AVL. 2009. Barcoding Lepidoptera: Current Situation and Perspectives on the Usefulness of a Contentious Technique. Neotropical Entomology, 38 (4): 441–451.