AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightIt has been concluded that proequal public policies should be devised to reduce inequalities.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Income inequality has been observed across both advanced and emerging market economies for the last thirty years. The neoliberal policies has resulted in a significant change in the distribution of income and wealth around the world in favour of the top income receivers. Uneven distribution of income has recently been one of the main issues for researchers and policy makers. The reason why income inequality has been so high on the agenda is that because it has important consequences that erode social justice and peace in society. Rising inequality might damage economic growth, might pose a serious barrier to social development and hamper well-being, and might cause political instability. Income inequality can be observed and analysed from various perspectives, such as regions, cities, gender, education, family size, occupations, factors, status, etc. A different way of analysis of income inequality can be made by comprising and harmonising three categories of income, namely income by occupations, income by employment status, and types of income (functional income). In this way, a relative income index has been constituted to demonstrate the top income receivers from every income category. It has been found that the managers from the first category, employers from the second category, and entrepreuners, rent and interest receivers from the third category constitute the top income receivers. The aim of this paper is to highlight that the top income receivers from aforesaid three income categories contribute to income inequality the most in Turkey. It has been concluded that proequal public policies should be devised to reduce inequalities.
Özet
Income inequality has been observed across both advanced and emerging market economies for the last thirty years. The neoliberal policies has resulted in a significant change in the distribution of income and wealth around the world in favour of the top income receivers. Uneven distribution of income has recently been one of the main issues for researchers and policy makers. The reason why income inequality has been so high on the agenda is that because it has important consequences that erode social justice and peace in society. Rising inequality might damage economic growth, might pose a serious barrier to social development and hamper well-being, and might cause political instability. Income inequality can be observed and analysed from various perspectives, such as regions, cities, gender, education, family size, occupations, factors, status, etc. A different way of analysis of income inequality can be made by comprising and harmonising three categories of income, namely income by occupations, income by employment status, and types of income (functional income). In this way, a relative income index has been constituted to demonstrate the top income receivers from every income category. It has been found that the managers from the first category, employers from the second category, and entrepreuners, rent and interest receivers from the third category constitute the top income receivers. The aim of this paper is to highlight that the top income receivers from aforesaid three income categories contribute to income inequality the most in Turkey. It has been concluded that proequal public policies should be devised to reduce inequalities.