SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2005 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

THE USE OF INDUSTRIAL WASTES IN ADOBE STABILIZATION

ENDÜSTRİYEL ATIKLARIN KERPİÇ STABİLİZASYONUNDA KULLANILMASI

Nurhayat DEĞİRMENCİ
Pages
505–515
Publication Date
2010-08-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also the compressive strength tests were performed on specimens which soaked in water for 24 hours and these compressive strength values are satisfactory since they are greater than the average value required for standards.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACTThe main disadvantages of adobe are its low mechanical properties and poor water resistance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hydrated lime was used 10 % and fly ash 20%, respectively of total dry mixture weight and phosphogypsum/soil ratios varied between 0.25 and 2.50 in the mixtures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also the compressive strength tests were performed on specimens which soaked in water for 24 hours and these compressive strength values are satisfactory since they are greater than the average value required for standards.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kerpiç · stabilizasyon · endüstriyel atıklar

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe main disadvantages of adobe are its low mechanical properties and poor water resistance. Phosphogypsum and fly ash used in this research, by-product from phosphoric acid fertilizer industry and thermal power plants, to improve the quality of earthen material in order to reduce its disadvantages at least partially. Hydrated lime was used 10 % and fly ash 20%, respectively of total dry mixture weight and phosphogypsum/soil ratios varied between 0.25 and 2.50 in the mixtures. The compressive strength test, unit weight and water absorption by capillarity values were determined on prepared 28-day specimens. Also the compressive strength tests were performed on specimens which soaked in water for 24 hours and these compressive strength values are satisfactory since they are greater than the average value required for standards.

Özet

Kerpicin zayıf yönü basınç dayanımının ve suya karşı direncinin az olmasıdır. Bu çalışmada kerpicin özelliklerini geliştirmek ve zayıf yönlerini kısmen de olsa giderebilmek amacı ile katkı olarak endüstriyel atık ürün olan, gübre fabrikası atığı fosfoalçı ve termik santral atığı uçucu kül kullanılmıştır. Toplam kuru karışım ağırlığının %10’u oranında sönmüş toz kireç, %20’si oranında uçucu kül kullanılmış ve fosfoalçı/toprak oranları 0.25 ile 2.50 arasında seçilmiştir. Hazırlanan numunelerin basınç dayanımları, kuru birim ağırlık ve kılcallıkla su emme değerleri tayin edilmiştir. Ayrıca 24 saat su içinde tutulan numuneler üzerinde basınç dayanımı deneyi uygulanmış ve her iki durumda da basınç dayanımı değerlerinin standartta ön görülen değerleri sağladığı görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

DEĞİRMENCİ, N. (2010). THE USE OF INDUSTRIAL WASTES IN ADOBE STABILIZATION. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 505–515. https://ajindex.com/articles/255607

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Mc. Henry, P.G., “Adobe and Rammed Earth Buildings (Design and Construction)”, The University of Arizona Press, Tuscon, p: 217 (1984).
  2. Kamamba, D.M.K., “Cyclical Maintenance of Erathen Architecture as a Future Policy in Tanzania, 6th International Conference on the Conservation of Earthen Architecture, New Mexico, pp: 77-80 (1990).
  3. Alvarenga, M.A.A., “Adobe Constructive Method and Thermic Characteristics”, 6th International Conference on the Conservation of Earthen Architecture, New Mexico, pp: 357-362 (1990).
  4. Akman, A., “Yapı Biyolojisi-Yapı Ekolojisi ve yapıların İnsan Sağlığı Üzerindeki Etkilerini Ortaya Koyan Biyoklimatik–Diyagnostik Araştırma”, Teramed,Yapı Biyolojisi ve Ekolojisi Enstitüsü, Araştırma Tezi, İstanbul (1996).
  5. Austin, S.G., “Adobe and Related Building Materials in New Mexico”, 6th International Conference on the Conservation of Earthen Architecture, New Mexico, pp: 417-421 (1990).
  6. Neuman, J.V., et al, “Preservation of Adobe Construction in Rainy Areas” Middle East and Mediterranean Regional Conference on Earthen and Low Strength Masonry Buildings in Seismic Areas Conference Proceedings, Ankara, pp:185-189 (1986).
  7. Taylor, R.M., “An Evaluation of the New Mexico State Monuments Adobe Test Walls at Fort Selden”, 6th International Conference on the Conservation of Earthen Architecture, New Mexico, pp: 383-389 (1990).
  8. Tabban, A., Erdik, M., Bayülke, N., “Simple Rules for Adobe Block Making and Adobe Masonry Construction”, Middle East and Mediterranean Regional Conference on Earthen and Low Strength Masonry Buildings in Seismic Areas Conference Proceedings, Ankara (1986).
  9. Oliveira, M.M., et al, “The Study of Accelerated Carbonation of Lime-Stabilized Soils”, 6th International Conference on the Conservation of Earthen Architecture, New Mexico, pp: 166-170 (1990).
  10. Coffman, R., “Adobe Mineralogy: characterization of adobes from Around the World”, 6th International Conference on the Conservation of Earthen Architecture, New Mexico, pp: 424-429 (1990).
  11. Toğrol, E., “Kerpiç Malzemesinin Özelliklerinin İyileştirilmesi”, Kerpiç Semineri Tebliğleri, İmar ve İskan Bakanlığı,Yapı Malzemesi Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara (1964).
  12. Akray, S., “Investigation on the Compressive Strengths of Various Stabilized Clay Adobe Bricks”, A Master Thesis Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering, M.E.T.U., Ankara (1965). Wolfskill,A.L., Dunlap,A.W., Gallaway,B.M.,“Earthen Home Construction”, Texas Transportation Institute, Bulletin No.18,E 18-62,
  13. Texas (1962). Kocataşkın