SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Life Economics / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

PURCHASING POWER PARITY APPROACH TO REAL EXCHANGE RATE MISALIGNMENT DETERMINATIONIN TURKEY: AN ANALYSIS WITH UNIT ROOT TEST WITH STRUCTURAL BREAK AND NONLINEAR UNIT ROOT TESTS

SATIN ALMA GÜCÜ PARİTESİ YAKLAŞIMI İLE TÜRKİYE’DE REEL DÖVİZ KURU YANLIŞ DENGELENMESİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: YAPISAL KIRILMALI VE DOĞRUSAL OLMAYAN BİRİM KÖK TESTLERİ İLE BİR ANALİZ

Sevgi Gerek
Mustafa Karabacak
Pages
1–24
Publication Date
2017-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The evidence from first generation unit root tests, unit root tests with structural break and nonlinear unit root tests show that the real exchange rate is misaligned in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The real exchange rate is an important indicator that permeates large areas of the economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, the level of the real exchange rate is perceived as a signal for policy makers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The evidence from first generation unit root tests, unit root tests with structural break and nonlinear unit root tests show that the real exchange rate is misaligned in Turkey.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Reel döviz kuru · reel döviz kuru yanlış dengelenmesi · satın alma gücü paritesi teorisi

Abstract

The real exchange rate is an important indicator that permeates large areas of the economy. Therefore, the level of the real exchange rate is perceived as a signal for policy makers. Temporary deviation of real exchange rate from its equilibrium level is natural but permanent deviations are a serious problem for the economy and it is known as “real exchange rate misalignment”. There are several alternative models to determine the real exchange rate misalignment but “purchasing power parity” is the first and the most popular theory to determine the real exchange rate misalignment and it is seen as a starting point for measuring misalignment. In this study real exchange rate misalignment in turkey is analyzed with first generation unit root tests, unit root tests with structural break and nonlinear unit root test, in the frame of purchasing power parity theory. The evidence from first generation unit root tests, unit root tests with structural break and nonlinear unit root tests show that the real exchange rate is misaligned in Turkey.

Özet

Reel döviz kuru ekonominin geniş alanlarına nüfuz eden önemli bir değişkendir ve reel döviz kurunun seviyesi politika yapıcılar açısından bir sinyal olarak algılanmaktadır. Bu nedenle reel döviz kurunun denge seviyesinden kalıcı olarak uzaklaşması ekonomi açısından önemli bir problemdir ve bu durum iktisat literatüründe “reel döviz kuru yanlış dengelenmesi” olarak adlandırılmaktadır. Reel döviz kuru yanlış dengelenmesinin belirlenmesi amacıyla çok sayıda alternatif model mevcuttur. Ancak yanlış dengelenmenin ölçülmesi için geliştirilen en eski model olmasına rağmen halen en popüler model olan satın alma gücü paritesi teorisi yanlış dengelenmenin ölçülmesi açısından bir çıkış noktası olarak görülmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışmada Türkiye için yanlış dengelenme, satın alma gücü paritesi çerçevesinde, birinci nesil birim kök testleri, yapısal kırılmalı birim kök testleri ve doğrusal olmayan birim kök testleri aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular Türkiye için hesaplanan reel döviz kuru serilerinin seviyelerinde durağan olmadığını ve dolayısıyla reel döviz kurlarının yanlış dengelendiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gerek, S., Karabacak, M. (2017). PURCHASING POWER PARITY APPROACH TO REAL EXCHANGE RATE MISALIGNMENT DETERMINATIONIN TURKEY: AN ANALYSIS WITH UNIT ROOT TEST WITH STRUCTURAL BREAK AND NONLINEAR UNIT ROOT TESTS. Journal of Life Economics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 1–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/2548

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. ABUAF, N. and JORION, P, 1990, Purchasing Power Parity in the Long Run, Journal of Finance, 45, 157–174.
  2. ADLER, M. and LEHMAN, B., 1983, Deviations From Purchasing Power Parity in The Long Run, Journal of Finance, 38, 147-87.
  3. AKRAM, Q. F., BRUNVATNE, K. M. and LOKSHALL, R., 2003,
  4. Real Equilibrium Exchange Rates, Norges Bank Occasional papers no:32. BAILLIE, R.T. ve SELOVER, D., 1987, Cointegration and Models of Exchange Rate Determination, International Journal of Forecasting, 3, 43–51.
  5. BALASSA, B., 1964, The Purchasing-Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal, Journal of Political Economy, 72 (6), 585–596.
  6. BANERJEE, A., LUMSDAİNE, R. L. ve STOCK, J.H.,1992, Recursive and Sequential Tests of the Unit Root and Trend-Break Hypothesis: Theory and International Evidence, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,10, pp. 271-287.
  7. BAUM, C. F., BARKOULAS, J. ve ÇAĞLAYAN, M., 1999, Nonlinear Adjustment to Purchasing Power Parity in The Post - Bretton Woods Era. http://fmwww.bc.edu/ecp/wp404.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.05.2014).
  8. BOZOKLU, Ş. ve YILANCI, V., 2010, Reel Döviz Kurlarının Durağanlığı: E7 Ülkeleri İçin Ampirik Bir İnceleme, Maliye Dergisi, 158, 587–606.
  9. CARLSSON M., LYHAGEN J. ve ÖSTERHOLM P., 2007, Testing For Purchasing Power Parity in Cointegrated Panels, IMF Working Paper No: 07/287. CASSEL, G., 1918, Abnormal Deviations in International Exchanges, The Economic Journal, 28 (112), 413–415.
  10. CASSEL, G.,1922, Money and Foreign Exchange after 1914,
  11. Constable, London. CHEUNG, Y.W. ve LAI, K. S, 1993, A Fractional Cointegration Analysis Of Purchasing Power Parity, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 11 (1), 103–112.
  12. CHEUNG, Y.W. ve LAI, K.S., 1998, Parity Reversion in Real Exchange Rates During the Post-Bretton Woods Period, Journal of International Money and Finance, 17, 597–614.
  13. CHEUNG, Y.W., Lai, K. S. ve BERGMAN, M., 2004, Dissecting the PPP Puzzle: The Unconventional Roles of Nominal Exchange Rate and Price Adjstments, Journal of International Economics, 64, 135–150.
  14. CHINI, E.Z., 2010, Updating The PPP Puzzle: Should We Use Nonlinear Models?, MPRA Paper No. 37418. CHINN, M., 1997,
  15. Sectoral Productivity, Government Spending And Real Exchange Rates: Empirical Evidence For OECD Countries, NBER Working Paper No: 6017. CHORTAREAS, G.E., KAPETANIOS, G. ve SHIN, Y., 2002, Nonlinear Mean Reversion in Real Exchange Rates, Econ Lett, 77 (3), 411–441.
  16. CHOUDHRY, T., MCNOWN, R. ve WALLACE, M., 1991, Purchasing Power Parity And The Canadian Float In The 1950s, Revie