Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2009 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Effects of Water Deficit Induced by PEG and NaCl onChickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Cultivars and Lines at Early Seedling Stages

Pages
5–14
Publication Date
2010-03-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Key Words: Drought, early seedling stage, germination, NaCl, PEG, salinity, water deficit

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effects of water deficit induced by different osmotic potential levels [0 (control), -0.4, -0.6 and -0.8 MPa] of PEG 6000 and NaCl treatments on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars and lines at germination and early growth stages by sampling on 4th and 8th days of incubation consisting of 4 days each of dark and subsequent 16 hours illumination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All of these treatments affected germination percentages of all genotypes but PEG was more effective in inhibition than NaCl at the MPa levels tested.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Key Words: Drought, early seedling stage, germination, NaCl, PEG, salinity, water deficit
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Drought · early seedling stage · germination

Abstract

The effects of water deficit induced by different osmotic potential levels [0 (control), -0.4, -0.6 and -0.8 MPa] of PEG 6000 and NaCl treatments on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars and lines at germination and early growth stages by sampling on 4th and 8th days of incubation consisting of 4 days each of dark and subsequent 16 hours illumination. All of these treatments affected germination percentages of all genotypes but PEG was more effective in inhibition than NaCl at the MPa levels tested. The experimental studies showed that all of the genotypes tested could be classified as tolerant, moderately tolerant and sensitive ones. But the tolerance levels were not found to be correlated directly with MPa levels applied, as Canıtez and ILC-3279 were tolerant to PEG, but ILC-3279 was sensitive to NaCl treatment. Within this context the classification can be summarized as below: PEG tolerant (Canıtez and ILC-3279), moderately tolerant (AkN 87, FLIP 87-59C, GÖkçe and Uzunlu), sensitive (AkN 290 and ER 99). NaCl tolerant (Uzunlu and FLIP 87-59C), moderately tolerant (GÖkçe, Canıtez, AkN 290 and AkN 87) and sensitive (ER 99 and ILC-3279). Key Words: Drought, early seedling stage, germination, NaCl, PEG, salinity, water deficit

🔖

Cite This Article

MACAR, T. K., TURAN, Ö., EKMEKÇİ, Y. (2010). Effects of Water Deficit Induced by PEG and NaCl onChickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Cultivars and Lines at Early Seedling Stages. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 5–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/254748

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Singh, K.B., “Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”, Field Crops Res., 53: 161-170 (1997).
  2. Lev-Yadun, S., Gopher, A., Abbo, S., “The cradle of agriculture”, Science, 288: 1602-1603 (2000). [3] Internet: FAOSTAT Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Statistical Databases, http://www.fao.org (2006).
  3. Saxena, N.P., “Status of chickpea in the Mediterranean basin. In: Present Status and Future Prospects of Chickpea Crop Production and Improvement in the Mediterranean Countries. Seminar Méditerraneennes (CIHEAM) Série A, 9: 17-24 (1990). (Spain)”, Options Katerji, N., van Hoorn, J.W., Hamdy, A., Mastrorilli, M., Oweis, T., Malhotra, R.S., “Response to soil salinity of two chickpea varieties differing in drought tolerance”, Agr. Water Manage., 50: 83-96 (2001).
  4. Almansouri, M., Kinet, J.M., Lutts, S., “Effect of salt and osmotic stresses on germination in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.)”, Plant Soil, 231: 243-254 (2001).
  5. Kaya, M.D., Okçu, G., Atak, M., Çıkılı, Y., Kolsarıcı, Ö., “Seed treatments to overcome salt and drought stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”, Eur. J. Agron., 24: 291- 295 (2006).
  6. Soltani, A., Gholipoor, M., Zeinali, E., “Seed reserve utilization and seedling growth of wheat as 13 affected by drought and salinity”, Environ. Exp. Bot., 55: 195-200 (2006).
  7. Katerji, N., van Hoorn, J.W., Hamdy, A., Mastrorilli, M., “Comparison of corn yield response to plant water stress caused by salinity and by drought”, Agr. Water Manage., 65: 95-101 (2004).
  8. Legocka, J., Kluk, A., “Effect of salt and osmotic stress on changes in polyamine content and arginine decarboxylase activity in Lupinus luteus seedlings”, J. Plant Physiol., 162: 662-668 (2005).
  9. Delachiave, M.E.A., de Pinho, S.Z., “Germination of Senna occidentalis link: Seed at different osmotic potantial levels”, Braz. Arch. Biol. Techn., 46: 163- 166 (2003).
  10. Demiral, T., Türkan, İ., “Exogenous glycinebetaine affects growth and proline accumulation and retards senescence in two rice cultivars under NaCl stress”, Environ. Exp. Bot., 56: 72-79 (2006).
  11. Teixeira, J., Pereira, S., “High salinity and drought act on an organ-dependent manner on potato glutamine synthetase expression and accumulation”, Environ. Exp. Bot., 60: 121-126 (2007).
  12. Güneş, A., Çiçek, N., İnal, A., Alpaslan, M., Eraslan, F., Guneri, E., Güzelordu, T., “Genotypic response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to drought stress implemented at pre- and post- anthesis stages and its relations wit