Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2019 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Reducing the Impact of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Disease by Domestic Animals and Tilapia Fish: A System Dynamics Model

Pages
595–606
Publication Date
2019-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicate that basic reproductive number and its prevalence in humans decreases as the size of domestic animal and the sandflies larvae eaten by Tilapia fish increases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to seek ways in reducing incidence of vector borne disease called leishmaniasis on humans.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition to the zooprophylaxis effect in which domestic animals acting as dead-end hosts are used to alleviate the incidence on humans, we also incorporate the Tilapia fish population into the model to observe its effect in terms of relieving the vector bites on humans.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicate that basic reproductive number and its prevalence in humans decreases as the size of domestic animal and the sandflies larvae eaten by Tilapia fish increases.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Leishmaniasis · Sandflies · Tilapia

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to seek ways in reducing incidence of vector borne disease called leishmaniasis on humans. Frequently encountered in East Mediterranean and Southeastern Anatolian region of Turkey due to risk factors including poverty, malnutrition, lack of sanitation and defrostration, leishmaniasis disease is transmitted by sandflies’ (vector) bites to humans. In addition to the zooprophylaxis effect in which domestic animals acting as dead-end hosts are used to alleviate the incidence on humans, we also incorporate the Tilapia fish population into the model to observe its effect in terms of relieving the vector bites on humans. We elaborate dynamic behavior and feedback loop structure of the system under study with three blood meal hosts: rodents, humans, and domestic animals. Proposed model is simulated throughout a period of 1000 days. We conduct sensitivity analysis by changing the rates of vector biting and the number of larvae eaten by Tilapia fish which influence the transmission of the disease. Results indicate that basic reproductive number and its prevalence in humans decreases as the size of domestic animal and the sandflies larvae eaten by Tilapia fish increases.

🔖

Cite This Article

KESEN, S. E., KURT, S. (2019). Reducing the Impact of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Disease by Domestic Animals and Tilapia Fish: A System Dynamics Model. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 595–606. https://ajindex.com/articles/254547

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Lane, R.P., Sand flies (Phlebotominae). In: Lane, R.P., Crosskey, R.W. (Eds.),Medical Insects and Arachnids. Chapman and Hall, London, 78–119, (1993).[2] Postigo, J.A., 2010. Leishmaniasis in the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 36 (Suppl. 1), S62–S65.[3] Ozkeklikci A, Karakus M, Ozbel Y, The new situation of cutaneous leishmaniasis after Syrian civil war in Gaziantep city, Southeastern region of Turkey. Acta Trop.;166:35–8 (2017)[4] Nowak, R., Walker’s Mammals of the World. Baltimore Johns Hopkins Univer-sity Press,
  2. Baltimore, Maryland (1999).[5] Murray, L., Dalal, S., Rico, P., Chenault, V., 2004. Evaluation of the estrous cycle inthe sand rat, (Psammomys obesus), an animal model of nutritionally induceddiabetes mellitus. J. Vet. Res. 8, 7–15.[6] Killick-Kendrick, R. (Ed.), 1987. The Leishmaniasis in Biology and Medicine, vol. I.Academic Press, London, pp. 263–290.[7] Service, M.W., 1991. Agricultural development and arthropod-borne diseases: areview. Rev. Saude Publica 25 (3), 165–178.[8] Bettini, S., Romi, R., 1998. Zooprophylaxis: old and new problems. Parassitologia 40(4), 423–430.[9] Bøgh, C., Clarke, S.E., Walraven, G.E., Lindsay, S.W., 2002. Zooprophylaxis artefact orreality? A paired-cohort study of the effect of passive zooprophylaxis on malariain The Gambia. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 96 (6), 593–596.[10] Chelbi, I., Kaabi, B., Derbali, M., Ahmed, S.B., Dellagi, K., Zhioua, E., 2008. Zoopro-phylaxis: impact of breeding rabbits around houses on reducing the indoorabundance of Phlebotomus papatasi. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 8 (6), 741–747.[11] Kaburi, J.C., Githuto, J.N., Muthami, L., Ngure, P.K., Mueke, J.M., Mwandawiro, C.S.,2009. Effects of long-lasting insecticidal nets and zooprophylaxis on sandflyfeeding behaviour and density in Mwea, central Kenya. J. Vector Borne Dis. 46(3), 184–190.[12] Kaabi, B., Ahmed, S.B-h, 2013. Assessing the effect of zooprophylaxis on zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis disease: A system dynamics approach. BioSystems. 114(3), 253-260.[13] Petr, T (2000). "Interactions between fish and aquatic macrophytes in inland waters. A review". FAO Fisheries Technical Papers. 396.[14] Reithinger, R., Espinoza, J.C., Davies, C.R., 2003. The transmission dynamics of canineamerican cutaneous leishmaniasis in Huanuco Peru. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 69(5), 473–480.[15] Palatnik-de-Sousa, C.B., Batista-de-Melo, L.M., Borja-Cabrera, G.P., Palatnik, M.,Lavor, C.C., 2004. Improving