Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2019 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

AN ERGONOMIC INVESTIGATION OF WORKING ENVIRONMENT WITH KANO MODEL AND UNIVERSAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES

Pages
582–593
Publication Date
2019-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Proposed approach is validated with a real-world application, where questionnaires were prepared based on ergonomic conditions and UDP, and then the approach was evaluated with Kano Model for a large-scale public institution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Quality of work environment in terms of adequacy of the conditions of working offices is becoming more important each passing day for companies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is revealed that ergonomically suitable working environment makes employee motivation increase, and that precisely has a positive effect on both human health and company interests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Proposed approach is validated with a real-world application, where questionnaires were prepared based on ergonomic conditions and UDP, and then the approach was evaluated with Kano Model for a large-scale public institution.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ergonomic design · Universal design principles · Kano model

Abstract

Quality of work environment in terms of adequacy of the conditions of working offices is becoming more important each passing day for companies. It is revealed that ergonomically suitable working environment makes employee motivation increase, and that precisely has a positive effect on both human health and company interests. Kano model is a powerful tool used in the determination of design requirements for the classification of the users’ degree of satisfaction, but even for this tool, a common language of phrase is needed to show what extends has to be achieved to provide these customer needs independently from individual point of views. Universal Design Principles (UDP) is a tool to evaluate products, services and the environment to make them used by everyone without needing additional design and regardless of age and skills. In this study, we propose some suggestions about ergonomic design of work environment to eliminate the factors that prevent unhealthy, inefficient and unsafe work conditions via the employment of a common language in terms of occupants’ requests. We used Kano model and UDP tools and propose an integrated approach to offer an enhanced working environment. Proposed approach is validated with a real-world application, where questionnaires were prepared based on ergonomic conditions and UDP, and then the approach was evaluated with Kano Model for a large-scale public institution.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADEM, A., KAYA, B. Y., DAGDEVIREN, M. (2019). AN ERGONOMIC INVESTIGATION OF WORKING ENVIRONMENT WITH KANO MODEL AND UNIVERSAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 582–593. https://ajindex.com/articles/254546

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akyüz, K. C., Balaban, Y. and Yıldırım, İ. “Orman Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Gereksinimlerinin Kano Modeli Yardımıyla Sınıflandırılması”, Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2): 258-267, (2013).
  2. Uca, M. and Menteş, S.,”İşletme Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Bölüm Gereksinimlerinin Kano Modeli İle Siniflandirilmasi: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi Uygulamasi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1),(2008).
  3. Sofyalioğlu, Ç. and Tunail, İ.,”Kano Modelinin Kalite Fonksiyon Göçerimi Planlama Matrisinde Kullanımı”, Ege Academic Review, 12(1), (2012).
  4. Shahin, A. and Zairi, M., “Kano model: A dynamic approach for classifying and prioritising requirements of airline travellers with three case studies on international airlines”, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 20(9), 1003-1028, (2009).
  5. Books, G. J., and Klemm, K. “A unique approach to preventing back pain in the dental office”, Work (Reading, Mass.), 42(2): 299-306, (2011).
  6. Kırzıoğlu, Z. and Yetiş, A., “Diş hekimliği kliniklerinde ergonomik düzenlemeler”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, (3), (2013).
  7. Gravina, N., Lindstrom-Hazel, D., and Austin, J. “The effects of workstation changes and behavioral interventions on safe typing postures in an office”, Work-Andover Medical Publishers Incorporated Then Ios Press-, 29(3): 245,(2007).
  8. Lewis, R. J., Krawiec, M., Confer, E., Agopsowicz, D. and Crandall, E. “Musculoskeletal disorder worker compensation costs and injuries before and after an office ergonomics program” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 29(2): 95-99, (2002).
  9. Mahmud, N., Kenny, D. T., Zein, R. M. and Hassan, S. N. “Ergonomic training reduces musculoskeletal disorders among office workers: results from the 6-month follow-up”, The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 18(2):1,(2011).
  10. Robertson, M., Amick, B. C., 3rd, DeRango, K., Rooney, T., Bazzani, L., Harrist, R., and Moore, A. “The effects of an office ergonomics training and chair intervention on worker knowledge, behavior and musculoskeletal risk” Applied Ergonomics, 40(1):124-135,(2009).
  11. Robertson, M. M., Ciriello, V. M., and Garabet, A. M. “Office ergonomics training and a sit-stand workstation: effects on musculoskeletal and visual symptoms and performance of office workers”, Applied Ergonomics, 44(1); 73-85, (2013).
  12. Avikal, S., Jain, R. and Mishra P.K. “A Kano model, AHP and M-TOPSIS method-based technique for disassembly line balancing under