Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2021 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

Bayesian Confidence Interval Estimation of Weibull Modulus Under Increasing Failure Rate

Pages
290–309
Publication Date
2021-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the Bayesian Weibull models significantly outperform the maximum likelihood method for almost all Weibull modulus and sample size values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Estimating the confidence interval of the Weibull modulus is an important problem in the fracture strength modeling of ceramic and composite materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Recently a Bayesian Weibull model has been proposed for estimating confidence lower bounds for Weibull percentiles using the prior knowledge that the failure rates are increasing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the Bayesian Weibull models significantly outperform the maximum likelihood method for almost all Weibull modulus and sample size values.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Weibull modulus · Bayesian · Interval estimation

Abstract

Estimating the confidence interval of the Weibull modulus is an important problem in the fracture strength modeling of ceramic and composite materials. It is particularly important in cases where the sample size is small due to high experimental costs. For this purpose, several classical methods, including the popular maximum likelihood method, and Bayesian methods have been developed in the literature. However, studies on Bayesian inference have remained very limited in the materials science literature. Recently a Bayesian Weibull model has been proposed for estimating confidence lower bounds for Weibull percentiles using the prior knowledge that the failure rates are increasing. This prior argument requires the Weibull modulus to be more than 1 due to wear-out failure. In this study, under the same prior information, two Bayesian Weibull models, one using the same prior argument and the other a relaxed version of it, have been developed for confidence interval estimation of the Weibull modulus. Their estimation performances have been compared against the maximum likelihood method with Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that the Bayesian Weibull models significantly outperform the maximum likelihood method for almost all Weibull modulus and sample size values.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇINKAYA, M., BİRGÖREN, B. (2021). Bayesian Confidence Interval Estimation of Weibull Modulus Under Increasing Failure Rate. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 290–309. https://ajindex.com/articles/254347

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Weibull, W., “A Statistical Theory of the Strength of Materials”. Ingvetenskaps Akad. Handl. 151, Stockholm (1939)
  2. Barbero, E., Fernández-Sáez, J. and Navarro, C., “Statistical analysis of the mechanical properties of composite materials”, Compos. Part B-Eng, 31(5): 375-381, (2000)
  3. McCool, J., “Flexural strength tests of brittle materials: selecting the number of specimens and determining confidence limits for Weibull parameters”, J. Test Eval., 45(2): 664-670 (2016)
  4. Barbero, E., Fernández-Sáez, J. and Navarro, C., “Statistical distribution of the estimator of Weibull modulus”, J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 20(9): 847-849, (2001)
  5. McCool, J.I., Using the Weibull distribution: Reliability, Modeling, and Inference, 1st ed. NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc, (2012)
  6. Wua, D., Lia, Y., Zhanga, J., Changa, L., Wu, D.,Fang, Z. and Shic, Y., “Effects of the number of testing specimens and the estimation methods on the Weibull parameters of solid catalysts”, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(24): 7035-7044, (2001)
  7. Bao, Y.W. and Zhou, Y., “Investigation on Reliability of Nanolayer Grained Ti3SiC2 via Weibull Statistics”, J. Mater. Sci., 42(12): 4470-4475, (2007)
  8. Nohut, S., “Influence of sample size on strength distribution of advanced ceramics”, Ceram. Int., 40(3): 4285-4295, (2014)
  9. Khalili, A. and Kromp, K., “Statistical properties of Weibull estimators”, J. Mater. Sci., 26(24): 6741-6752, (1991)
  10. Durham, S., Lynch, J. and Padgett, W., “Inference for strength distributions of brittle fibers under increasing failure rate”, J. Composite Mater., 22(12): 1131–1140, (1988)
  11. Durham, S., Lynch, J. and Padgett, W., “A theoretical justification for an increasing average failure rate strength distribution in fibrous composites”, Naval Res. Logistics (NRL), 36(5): 655–661, (1989)
  12. Durham, S., Lynch, J. and Padgett, W., “TP 2-orderings and the IFR property with applications”, Probability Eng. Inf. Sci., 4(01): 73–88, (1990)
  13. Yalcinkaya, M. and Birgoren, B., “Confidence interval estimation of Weibull lower percentiles in small samples via Bayesian inference”, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 37: 2983-2990, (2017)
  14. Meyers, M.A. and Chawla, K.K., Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (2009)
  15. Askeland, D.R., Fulay, P. and Wright, W., The Science and Engineering of Materials, 6th ed. Starnford: Thomson Learning Inc, (2010)
  16. Bousquet, N., “Eliciting vague but proper maximal entropy priors in Bayesian experiments”