Journals / Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi B - Teorik Bilimler / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF SPATIAL RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION APPLYING DIFFERENT INTERPOLATION METHODS IN PORSUK RIVER BASIN, TURKEY

Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2021-02-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, TP displayed smoother results at the points where the rain gauges were closer to each other or dense.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Porsuk River Basin, located in the Central Anatolia, Turkey, has a drainage area of 10818.41 km2 and a total length of 460 km, which makes it a significant region for a variety of hydrological and hydropower studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To fulfil this aim, the meteorological data gauged between 1927-2015 by 15 different stations within and around the study area were used to perform interpolation functions with three widely known spatial distribution methods, namely Thiessen Polygons (TP), Spline (SP) and Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), for the determination of the rainfall distribution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, TP displayed smoother results at the points where the rain gauges were closer to each other or dense.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Rainfall distribution · inverse distance weighting (IDW) · spline (SP)

Abstract

Porsuk River Basin, located in the Central Anatolia, Turkey, has a drainage area of 10818.41 km2 and a total length of 460 km, which makes it a significant region for a variety of hydrological and hydropower studies. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the rainfall distribution over the basin so that related projects and processes, such as dam planning works, can be properly performed. To fulfil this aim, the meteorological data gauged between 1927-2015 by 15 different stations within and around the study area were used to perform interpolation functions with three widely known spatial distribution methods, namely Thiessen Polygons (TP), Spline (SP) and Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), for the determination of the rainfall distribution. Moreover, the reliability of these methods was also evaluated and compared in terms of their Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Square Error (MSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Correlation Coefficient (R2) values. The results revealed that IDW method, in general, was the most appropriate option for Porsuk River Basin in comparison with SP and TP methods, as MAE, MSE, RMSE and R2 values of this method was found 33.359, 1710.385, 41.357 and 0.7118 respectively. However, TP displayed smoother results at the points where the rain gauges were closer to each other or dense.

Özet

Porsuk River Basin, located in the central Anatolia, Turkey, has a drainage area of 10818.41 km2 and a total length of 460 km, which makes it a significant region for a variety of hydrological and hydropower studies. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the rainfall distribution over the basin so that related projects and processes, such as dam planning works, can be properly performed. To fulfill this aim, the meteorological data gauged between 1927-2015 by 15 different stations within and around the study area were used to perform interpolation functions with three widely known spatial distribution methods, namely Thiessen Polygons (TP), Spline (SP) and Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), to estimate the rainfall distribution. Moreover, the reliability of these methods were also evaluated and compared in terms of their Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Square Error (MSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Correlation Coefficient (R2) values. The results revealed that IDW method, in general, was the most appropriate option for Porsuk River Basin comparison with methods of SP and TP, as it generated the MAE, MSE, RMSE and R2 values of 33.359, 1710.385, 41.357 and 0.7118 respectively. However, TP displayed a smoother result at the point, where the rain gauges are closer to each other or highly densed.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKIŞ, R., BAYAZIT, Y., AHMADY, D. M., ÇABUK, S. N. (2021). ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF SPATIAL RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION APPLYING DIFFERENT INTERPOLATION METHODS IN PORSUK RIVER BASIN, TURKEY. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi B - Teorik Bilimler, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/253822

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Daly C, Neilson RP, Phillips DL. A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J Appl Meteorol 1994; 33(2):140–158
  2. Foufoula-Georgiou E, Georgakakos KP. Hydrologic advances in space-time precipitation modeling and forecasting. In: Bowles DS, O'Connell PE, editors. Recent advances in the modeling of hydrologic systems. Netherlands: Springer, 1991. pp 47–65
  3. Michaelides S, Levizzani V, Anagnostou E, Bauer P, Kasparis T, Lane JE. Precipitation: Measurement, remote sensing, climatology and modeling. Atmos Res 2009; 94(4):512–533
  4. Basistha A, Arya DS, Goel NK. Spatial distribution of rainfall in Indian Himalayas–a case study of Uttarakhand region. Water Resour Manag 2008; 22(10):1325–1346
  5. Cooley D, Nychka D, Naveau P. Bayesian spatial modeling of extreme precipitation return levels. J Am Stat Assoc 2007; 102 (479):824–840
  6. Valent P, Výleta R. Calculating areal rainfall using a more efficient IDW interpolation algorithm. Int J Eng Res Sci 2015; 1(7):9–17
  7. Guenni L, Hutchinson MF. Spatial interpolation of the parameters of a rainfall model from ground-based data. J Hydrol 1998; 212:335–347
  8. Barros AP, Lettenmaier DP. Dynamic modeling of orographically induced precipitation. Rev Geophys 1994; 32(2):265–284
  9. Nearing MA, Jetten V, Baffaut C, Cerdan O, Couturier A, Hernandez M, Le Bissonnais Y, Nicols MH, Nunes JP, Renschler CS. Modeling response of soil erosion and runoff to changes in precipitation and cover. Catena 2005; 61(2-3):131–154
  10. Ajayi IR, Afolabi MO, Ogunbodede EF, Sunday AG. Modeling rainfall as a constraining factor for Cocoa yield in Ondo State. Am J Sci Ind Res 2010; 1(2):127–134
  11. Chen FW, Liu CW. Estimation of the spatial rainfall distribution using inverse distance weighting (IDW) in the middle of Taiwan. Paddy Water Environ 2012; 10(3):209–222
  12. Duong VN, Philippe G. Rainfall uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling in large catchments: an operational approach applied to the Vu Gia-Thu Bon catchment-Viet Nam. In: 3rd IAHR Europe Congress; 14-16 April 2014; Porto, Portugal
  13. Earls J, Dixon B. Spatial interpolation of rainfall data using ArcGIS: A comparative study. In: 27th Annual ESRI International User Conference; 18-22 June 2007; San Diego,USA
  14. Mair A, Fares A. Comparison of rainfall interpolation methods in a mountainous region of a tropical island. J Hydrol Eng 2010; 16(4):371–383
  15. Mamassis N, Koutsoyiannis D. Influence