Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Microbial biosurfactants: Surface active agents

Mikrobiyal biyosürfektanlar: Yüzey aktif bileşikler

Pages
1–9
Publication Date
2015-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review we have discussed the literature about different microbial surfactants and their industrial and biomedical applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Surfactants, surface active compounds, are one of the most common used agents in daily life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While synthetic surfactants which are able to increase the contaminant solubility are often toxic, representing an additional source of contamination, biosurfactants offer advantages rather than synthetic surfactants due to their derivation from renewable resources, low or non-toxicity, biodegradability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review we have discussed the literature about different microbial surfactants and their industrial and biomedical applications.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyosürfektan · antibakteriyel · antifungal

Abstract

Surfactants, surface active compounds, are one of the most common used agents in daily life. While synthetic surfactants which are able to increase the contaminant solubility are often toxic, representing an additional source of contamination, biosurfactants offer advantages rather than synthetic surfactants due to their derivation from renewable resources, low or non-toxicity, biodegradability. Biosurfactants that has excellent surface activity are reusable and able to maintain their effectiveness under extreme temperature and pH conditions. They have the unique property of reducing the surface and interfacial tension of liquids. The major functions of biosurfactants includes solubilization, emulsification, dispersion, wetting, foaming, and detergent capacity, as well as antimicrobial and antifungal activity against a number of pathogenic organisms. In this review we have discussed the literature about different microbial surfactants and their industrial and biomedical applications.

Özet

Sürfektanlar, günlük yaşamda yaygın olarak kullanılan yüzey aktif ajanlardır. Kontaminant çözünürlüğünü arttırabilen sürfektanların sentetik olanları çoğunlukla toksik olup ek kontaminasyon kaynakları oluştururken, biyosürfektanlar, yenilenebilir kaynaklardan elde edilmeleri, düşük toksititeye sahip olmaları ya da toksik olmamaları, biyolojik olarak parçalanabilir olmaları gibi özelliklerinden ötürü daha avantajlı kullanım alanlarına sahiptir. Biyosürfektanlar, çok iyi derecede yüzey aktivitesine sahiptir, tekrar kullanılabilir, aşırı sıcaklık ve pH koşulları altında etkinlerini sentetik sürfektanlara kıyasla daha uzun süre muhafaza edebilir. Biyosürfektanlar, sıvıların yüzey ve arayüzey gerilimini azaltan özelliklere sahiptir. Biyosürfektanların önemli fonksiyonları arasında; patojenik organizmaların birçoğuna karşı antimikrobiyal ve antifungal aktivite göstermelerinin yanı sıra; çözme, emülsifiye etme, dağıtma, ıslatma, köpürme ve deterjan gibi fonksiyonları da bulunmaktadır. Bu derleme çalışmasında farklı mikrobiyal sürfektanlar ve bu sürfektanların endüstriyel ve biyomedikal uygulama alanları hakkında literatür bilgileri tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, F. N., AKÇELİK, M. (2015). Microbial biosurfactants: Surface active agents. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 1–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/253042

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Pacwa-Płociniczak, M., Płaza, G.A., Piotrowska-Seget, Z., and Cameotra, S.S., Environmental applications of biosurfactants: Recent Advances, Int. J. Mol. Sci, 12, 633- 654, 2011.
  2. Nitschke, M., Pastore, G.M., Production and properties of a surfactant obtained from Bacillus subtilis grown on cassava wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 97, 336- 341, 2006.
  3. McInerney, M.J., Javaheri, M., Nagle, D.P., Properties of the biosurfactant produced by Bacillus liqueniformis strain JF-2. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 5, 95-102, 1990.
  4. Pruthi, V., Cameotra, S.S., Production, properties of a biosurfactant synthesized by Arthrobacter protophormiae an Antartic strain. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 13, 137-139, 1997.
  5. Flasz, A., Rocha, C.A., Mosquera, B., Sajo, C., A comparative study of the toxicity of a synthetic surfactant and one produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 55925. Medical Science Research, 26 (3), 181-185, 1998.
  6. Edwards, K.R., Lepo, J.E., Lewis, M.A., Toxicity comparison of biosurfactants and synthetic surfactants used in oil spill remediation to two estuarine species. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 46 (10), 1309-1316, 2003.
  7. Rosenberg, E., Ron, E.Z., High- and low-molecular-mass microbial surfactants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 52, 154–162, 1999.
  8. Calvo, C., Manzanera, M., Silva-Castro, G.A., Uad, I., González-López, J., Application of bioemulsifiers in soil oil bioremediation processes. Future prospects. Sci. Total Environ, 407, 3634–3640, 2009.
  9. Sekhon, K.K., Khanna, S., and Cameotra, S.S., Biosurfactant Production and Potential Correlation with Esterase Biotechnology, 3:7, 2-10, 2012. & Environmental Jarvis, F.G., Johnson, M.J., A glycolipid produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Am Chem Soc, 71, 4124- 4126, 1949.
  10. Guerra-Santos, L.H., Kappeli, O., and Flechter, A., Dependence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa continuous culture biosurfactant production on nutritional and environmental factors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 24, 443–448, 1986.
  11. Lang, S., and Wagner, F., Structure and properties of biosurfactants, In N. Kosaric, W. L. Cairns, and N. C. C. Gray (eds), Biosurfactants and biotechnology. Marcel Dekker, Inc., 21–47, New York, 1987.
  12. Parra, J.L., Guinea, J., Manresa, M.A., Robert, M., Mercade, M.E., Comelles, F., and Bosch, M.P., Chemical characterization and physicochemical behaviour of biosurfactants. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc, 66, 141–145, 1989.
  13. Li, Z., Y., Lang, S., Wagner, F., Witte, L., and Wray, V., Formation glycolipids from