Journals / Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Physicochemical and microbiological quality of yogurts sold in locality bazaar in Balikesir

Balıkesir ilinde semt pazarlarında satışa sunulan yoğurtların fiziko-kimyasal ve mikrobiyolojik kalitesinin araştırılması

Pages
318–326
Publication Date
2020-01-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, although pathogenic microorganisms were not detected in yogurt samples, it was determined that there are hygiene problems in production due to the presence of hygiene indicator microorganisms and these products may be a potential risk to public health.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the physicochemical and microbiological quality of yogurts which produced by traditional methods and sold in the markets in Balıkesir province were determined and the compliance of yogurt samples to Turkish Food Codex was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Non-fat dry matter, fat, protein, titration acidity and pH values of 50 yogurt samples collected from markets were as follows; 12,07%, 3,06%, 4,11%, 1,31% and 4,11% respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, although pathogenic microorganisms were not detected in yogurt samples, it was determined that there are hygiene problems in production due to the presence of hygiene indicator microorganisms and these products may be a potential risk to public health.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yogurt · physicochemical quality · microbial quality

Abstract

In this study, the physicochemical and microbiological quality of yogurts which produced by traditional methods and sold in the markets in Balıkesir province were determined and the compliance of yogurt samples to Turkish Food Codex was investigated. Non-fat dry matter, fat, protein, titration acidity and pH values of 50 yogurt samples collected from markets were as follows; 12,07%, 3,06%, 4,11%, 1,31% and 4,11% respectively. Coliform, E. coli and Yeast/mold counts of the samples were 140 EMS/g, 112 EMS/g and 3,47 log cfu/g, respectively. The number of lactococci, which are the specific microorganisms of the samples, was 7.89 log cfu/g and the number of lactobacilli was 7,64 log cfu/g. On the other hand, important food pathogens such as Salmonella spp., L. monocytogenes and S. aureus couldn’t be identified in any of the samples. According to the findings obtained in our study, it was observed that 14%, 10%,8%,52% of the samples were not in compliance with Turkish Food Codex Communiqué on Fermented Dairy Products in terms of non-fat dry matter, Coliform, E. coli and yeast/mold counts, respectively. As a result, although pathogenic microorganisms were not detected in yogurt samples, it was determined that there are hygiene problems in production due to the presence of hygiene indicator microorganisms and these products may be a potential risk to public health.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Balıkesir ilinde geleneksel yöntemlerle üretilen ve semt pazarlarında satışa sunulan yoğurt örneklerinin fizikokimyasal ve mikrobiyolojik kalitesinin Türk Gıda Kodeksi’ne uygunluğu araştırıldı. Semt pazarlarından toplanan 50 yoğurt örneğinin yağsız kurumadde, yağ, protein, titrasyon asitliği ve pH değerleri sırasıyla; %12,07, %3,06, %4,11, %1,31 ve %4,11 olarak tespit edildi. Örneklerde Koliform, E. coli ve küf/maya sayıları ise sırasıyla 140 EMS/g, 112 EMS/g ve 3,47 log kob/g olarak tespit edildi. Örneklerde laktokok sayısı 7,89 log kob/g ve laktobasil sayısı ise 7,64 log kob/g olarak saptandı. Diğer yandan örneklerin hiçbirinde önemli gıda patojenleri olan Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes ve Staphylococcus aureus belirlenmemiştir. Çalışmamızda elde edilen bulgulara göre %14’ü yağsız kurumadde, %10’unu Koliform bakteri, %8’i E. coli ve % 52’si de maya/küf sayıları yönünden Türk Gıda Kodeks’i Fermente Süt Ürünleri Tebliği’ne (2001*; 2009) uygun olmadığı görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak yoğurt örneklerinde patojen mikroorganizma tespit edilmemiş olsa da hijyen indikatörü mikroorganizmaların yüksekliği nedeniyle üretimde hijyen problemlerinin olduğu ve potansiyel halk sağlığı riskleri taşıyabilecekleri belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAVŞANLI, H., GÖKMEN, M., ÖNEN, A. (2020). Physicochemical and microbiological quality of yogurts sold in locality bazaar in Balikesir. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 318–326. https://ajindex.com/articles/250862

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Baysal, A., Yoğurt: Küreselleşen Türk Besini, Türk Mutfak Kültürü Üzerine Araştırmalar, Türk Halk Kültürünü Araştırma ve Tanıtma Vakfı Yayınları, 30, 1-8, Ankara, (2002).
  2. Fisberg, M., Machado, R., History of yogurt and current patterns of consumption. Nutrition Reviews, 73,1, 4-7, (2015).
  3. Kashgari, M., Divan-Lugat at-Turk, Tranlated by R. Dankoff with J. Kelley as A Compendium of Turkish Dialects. Vol 2. Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press, (1984).
  4. Yusuf, K. H., Wisdom of Royal Glory (Kutadgu Bilig), A Turko-Islamic Mirror for Princes, translated with an introduction and notes by Robert Dankoff, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, (1983).
  5. Toygar, K., Türk Mutfak Kültürü Üzerine Araştırmalar, Türk Mutfağı Hakkında Genel Bilgiler, Ankara, 29, 137-144, (2001).
  6. Halıcı, N., Siniden Tepsiye Klasik Türk Mutfağı, Usaş Yayınları, İstanbul, (2009). [Aryana, K. J., Olson, D. W., A 100-year review: yogurt and other cultured dairy products, Journal of Dairy Science, 100, 12, 9987-10013, (2017). O’connell, J., Fox, P., Significance and applications of phenolic compounds in the production and quality of milk and dairy products: a review, International Dairy Journal, 11, 103-120, (2001).
  7. Preedy, V. R., Srirajaskanthan, R., Patel, V., Handbook of Food Fortification and Health, Humana Press, New York, (2013).
  8. Holzapfel, W. H., Geisen, R., Schillinger, U., Biological preservation of foods with reference to protective cultures, bacteriocins and food-grade enzymes, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 24, 343-362, (1995).
  9. Mattila-Sandholm, T., Saarela, M., Functional Dairy Products, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, 395, (2003).
  10. Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı, Türk Gıda Kodeksi Fermente Süt Ürünleri Tebliği, Ankara, Türkiye, 25, (2009). TUIK (Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu), https://ulusalsutkonseyi.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/Haber_Bulteni_haziran2017.pdf. (2017).
  11. Moreno, A. L. A., Cervera, R. P., Ortega, A. R. M., et al., Scientific evidence about the role of yogurt and other fermented milks in the healthy diet for the Spanish population, Nutrition Hospitalaria, 28, 2039-2089, (2013).
  12. Sezgin, E., Yoğurt Teknolojisi, SEGEM, 103, Ankara, 120-108, (1981). Yoğurt Standardı. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara (2006). TS ISO 8968-1. Süt ve süt ürünleri-Azot içeriği tayini-Bölüm 1:Kjeldahl prensibi ve ham protein hesaplanması. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara (2014). TS 3263 ISO10523 pH tayini. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara (1999). TS ISO 6611. Süt ve süt ürünl