SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Life Economics / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

RUSSIA'S MARKET AND PRODUCT-BASED EXPORT DIVERSIFICATION

Birol ERKAN
Zekai Fatih SUNAY
Pages
43–60
Publication Date
2018-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is likely that Russia, which can not diversify its exports on a market and product basis will be influenced by the global crisis.of the future.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Gini-Hirshman Index, Trade Concentration Ratio and Deviation Index has been used as the main measurement tools in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, Russia has been analyzed in terms of market and product-based export diversifications between 2000-2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is likely that Russia, which can not diversify its exports on a market and product basis will be influenced by the global crisis.of the future.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Export Diversification · Gini-Hirschman Index · Trade Concentration Ratio

Abstract

The Gini-Hirshman Index, Trade Concentration Ratio and Deviation Index has been used as the main measurement tools in this study. In the study, Russia has been analyzed in terms of market and product-based export diversifications between 2000-2016. Scores obtained at the end of the analyzes made reveal that the diversification of Russian exports is low on both market and product basis. It is obvious that high level of export concentrations will adversely affect the Russian economy. It is likely that Russia, which can not diversify its exports on a market and product basis will be influenced by the global crisis.of the future.

Özet

The Gini-Hirshman Index, Trade Concentration Ratio and Deviation Index has been used as the main measurement tools in this study. In the study, Russia has been analyzed in terms of market and product-based export diversifications between 2000-2016. Scores obtained at the end of the analyzes made reveal that the diversification of Russian exports is low on both market and product basis. It is obvious that high level of export concentrations will adversely affect the Russian economy. It is likely that Russia, which can not diversify its exports on a market and product basis will be influenced by the global crisis.of the future.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKAN, B., SUNAY, Z. F. (2018). RUSSIA'S MARKET AND PRODUCT-BASED EXPORT DIVERSIFICATION. Journal of Life Economics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 43–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/2498

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. AKEL, V. (2015). Kırılgan BeĢli Ülkelerinin Hisse Senedi Piyasaları Arasındaki EĢbüünleĢme Analizi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt 11, Sayı 24, 75-96.
  2. AMIGHINI, A. (2005). China in the International Fragmentation of Production:Evidence from the. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 2(2), 203-219.
  3. BAKKALCI, A. C. (2013). Yeni Yeni Ticaret Teorileri’nin Makroekonomik Doğası ve Türk Ekonomisi. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi Cilt: 11, Sayı:22, 69-98.
  4. BASHIMOV, G. (2015). Rusya Orman Ürünleri Sanayisinin Ġhracat Yapısı ve Rekabet Gücü. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Cilt:4, Sayı: 2 127, 125-134.
  5. BENDER, S., & LI, K. W. (2002). The Changing Trade and Revealed Comparative Advantages of Asian and Latin American Manufacture Exports. Yale Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 843, 1-25. ÇEġTEPE, H. (2012). Türkiye’nin SeçilmiĢ Ortadoğu Ülkeleriyle Ticaretinin Analizi. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. Cilt: 8, Sayı: 2, 23-43. ÇEVĠġ, Ġ., & CEYLAN, R. (2015). Kırılgan BeĢlide Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi (SAGP) Hipotezinin Test Edilmesi. Journal of Yasar University, 6381-6477.
  6. ÇINAR, S., & ÖZÇALIK, M. (2013). Ġmalat Sanayi Sektörünün Rekabetçilik Analizi: Türkiye ve G-8 Ülkeleri Panel Veri Analizi. Paper presented at EconAnadolu 2013: Anadolu International Conference in Economics III, 1-15. DEMĠRAL, M., & BAL, H. (2015). Ticaret Performansı Ölçümlerine Çok Boyutlu Bir YaklaĢım: SeçilmiĢ Ülke ve Sektörlere ĠliĢkin KarĢılaĢtırmalı Analiz. Çukurova Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 118, 115-133. EĞĠLMEZ, M. (2015, Eylül 18). Kırılgan Ekonomilerin En Kırılganları. Mayıs 8, 2016 tarihinde https://www.bilgeyatirimci.com/2015/09/18/mahfi-egilmez-kirilgan-ekonomilerin-en-kirilganlari/: https://www.bilgeyatirimci.com/2015/09/18/mahfi-egilmez-kirilgan-ekonomilerin-en-kirilganlari/ adresinden alındı EMRAH ÖNDER, N. T. (2015). Analitik Ağ ĠĢlemleri ve TOPSĠS Yöntemleri Kullanarak 2008-2009 Büyük Durgunluk Sonrası Kırılgan BeĢli Ülkelerin Ekonomik Performans Değerlendirmesi. Uygulamalı Finans ve Bankacılık Dergisi, 1-17.
  7. ERKAN, B. (2009). Ülkelerin Ġhracat Performanslarının Belirlenmesinde AçıklanmıĢ KarĢılaĢırmalı Üstünlüklerinin Kullanılması: Yükselen Ekonomiler Örneği. Manisa, Merkez: YayınlanmamıĢ doktora tezi. ERKAN, B. (2009). Ülkelerin Ġhracat Performanslarının Belirlenmesinde AçıklanmıĢ KarĢılaĢtırmalı Üstünlüklerinin Kullanılması: Yükselen Ekonomiler Örneği (Yayınlanmamıs doktora tezi, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bil