Journals / Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology / 2019 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

CHEMOTAXONOMY IN BACTERIAL SYSTEMATICS

Pages
78–90
Publication Date
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, how the chemotaxonomic data can beused in bacterial systematics and reflected to application within the field questions wereevaluated.-REVIEW.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz In taxonomy, polyphasic approach is based on the principle of combining andevaluating different types of data obtained from microorganisms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is beyond doubt that, in recent yearssignificant developments have been achieved in systematics by the aid of molecular biologicalstudies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, how the chemotaxonomic data can beused in bacterial systematics and reflected to application within the field questions wereevaluated.-REVIEW.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Bacteria · Phylogenetic systematic · Chemotaxonomy

Özet

Öz In taxonomy, polyphasic approach is based on the principle of combining andevaluating different types of data obtained from microorganisms. While, during characterizationand identification of a microorganism, in the direction of polyphasic studies, chemotaxonomicanalysis has of paramount importance for the determination of the most important differencesbetween the family, genus and species comparatively. It is beyond doubt that, in recent yearssignificant developments have been achieved in systematics by the aid of molecular biologicalstudies. Phylogenetic data have revealed the hierarchical arrangement of the kinship relationsbetween the given bacteria, however, this information cannot provide reliable data on the level ofgenus. At this stage, chemical markers play an important role in regulating inter-taxarelationships. Chemotaxonomy; is the whole of the characterizations made by using thesimilarities and differences of the biochemical properties of bacteria. In bacterial systematics,chemotaxonomy examines biochemical markers such as: amino acids and peptides(peptidoglycan), lipids (fatty acid, lipopolysaccharides, micolic acid and polar lipids),polysaccharides and related polymers (teicoic acid, whole sugar) and other complex polymericcompounds to find the distribution of members of different taxa and all of this information isused for classification and identification. In this review, how the chemotaxonomic data can beused in bacterial systematics and reflected to application within the field questions wereevaluated.-REVIEW.

🔖

Cite This Article

GOKDEMIR, F. S., ARAS, S. (2019). CHEMOTAXONOMY IN BACTERIAL SYSTEMATICS. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 78–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/247963

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. M.Goodfellow and A.G O' Donnell, Chemical Methods in Prokaryotic Systematics, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1994.
  2. M. Goodfellow and D.E Minnikin, Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics, Society for Applied Bacteriology, Technical Series No: 20, Academic Press, London and New York, 1985. E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow (Editors), Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics, Journal of Basic Microbiology, 31 (6), (1991) 479-480.
  3. I. Yamashita, M.Nakamura and S. Fukui, Gene fusion is a possible mechanism underlying the evolution of STA1, Journal of Bacteriology, 169 (5), (1987) 2142-2149.
  4. K.H. Schleifer and O. Kandler, Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implication, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 36 (4), (1972) 407. [6] A.M. Glauert and M.J. Thornley, The topography of the bacterial cell wall, Annual Reviews in Microbiology, 23 (1), (1969) 159-198. M.P. Lechevalier and H.A. Lechevalier, Chemical composition as a criterion in the classification of actinomycetes, International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 20, (1970b) 435-443.
  5. M. Leyh-Bouille, R. Bonaly, J.M. Ghuysen, R. Tinelli, D. Tipper, LL-diaminopimelic acid containing peptidoglycans in walls of Streptomyces sp. and of Clostridium perfringens (type A), Biochemistry, 21 (15), (1970) 2944–2952.
  6. M.P. Lechevalier and H. Lechevalier, Chemical composition as a criterion in the classification of aerobic actinomycetes, International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 20 (4), (1970) 435-443.
  7. J. Baddiley, Teichoic acids and the molecular structure of bacterial walls, The Leeuwenhoek lecture Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 170 (1021), (1967) 331–348.
  8. J. Baddiley, J.G. Buchanan, F.E. Hardy, R.O. Martin, U.L. Rajbhandary, A.R. Sanderson, The structure of the ribitol teichoic acid of Staphylococcus aureus, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 52, (1961) 406–407.
  9. J.J. Armstrong, J. Baddiley, J.G. Buchanan, Further studies on the teichoic acid from Bacillus subtilis walls, Biochemical Journal, 80, (1961) 254–261.
  10. J. Baddiley, J.G. Buchanan, U.L. Rajbhandary, A.R. Sanderson, Teichoic acid from the walls of Staphylococcus aureus structure of the N-acetylglucosaminyl-ribitol residues, Biochemical Journal, 82, (1962) 439–448.
  11. F. Kanetsuna, T. Imaeda, G. Cunto, On the linkage between mycolic acid and arabinogalactan in phenol-treated myobacterial cell walls, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 173 (2), (1969) 341–344.
  12. D.E. Minnikin, P.V. Patel, L. Alshamaony and M.