SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Foucault’s Method: The Archeology and Genealogy of Discursive Construction of Truth

Foucault’nun Yöntemi: Hakikatin Söylemsel İnşasının Arkeolojisi ve Soykütüğü

Ahmet Kemal BAYRAM
Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2018-09-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The genealogy, in the sense of history of present, investigates how we have constituted,recognized and accepted ourselves as subjects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to examine archeological method and genealogical approach that Foucaultrefers to as both a method and a strategy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Portraying power-knowledge relations as the essence ofmodern society and discourse, Foucault extensively studied dominant discourses in Western thoughtsince 16th century through archeological method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The genealogy, in the sense of history of present, investigates how we have constituted,recognized and accepted ourselves as subjects.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Foucault · Archeology · Genealogy

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine archeological method and genealogical approach that Foucaultrefers to as both a method and a strategy. Portraying power-knowledge relations as the essence ofmodern society and discourse, Foucault extensively studied dominant discourses in Western thoughtsince 16th century through archeological method. By means of archeological method, the researchercould delve into the roots of dominant discourse functioned within culture. Archeology, in thisframework, is a practice or “archive” science in Foucault’s work. Taking archeology as a field of research,Foucault not only examines meaning or reality, but also examines the historical a priori or possibilities,existence and transformations of discourses as they acquire a positive character. Archeology, throughthe description of conditions or rules, tries to “make visible invisible that things are not visible inthe surface”. The genealogy, in the sense of history of present, investigates how we have constituted,recognized and accepted ourselves as subjects.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAM, A. K. (2018). Foucault’s Method: The Archeology and Genealogy of Discursive Construction of Truth. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/24783

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Akay, A. (1995). Michel Foucault: İktidar ve Direnme Odakları, İstanbul:
  2. Bağlam Yayınları.
  3. Bayram, A., K. (2005). “Hakikat Rejimleri ve Söylemin Efendileri Arasında Bir Entelektüel: Michel Foucault”. Çağan, K. (Ed.), Entelektüel ve İktidar ss. 233-257. Ankara:
  4. Hece Yayınları.
  5. Bohman, J. ve McCarthy, T.A. (1987). After Philosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  6. Bozkurt, N. (1988). “M. Foucault Felsefesinin Bazı Temel Kavramları”, Defter, Sayı:4, ss, 39-50
  7. Connolly, W. E. (1993). “Beyond Good and Evil, The Ethical Sensibility of Michel Foucault”, Political Theory, Vol.21, No.3, ss. 365-389. London: Sage Publications. Deacon, R., A. (2003). Fabricating Foucault: Rationalising the Management of Individuals. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
  8. Descombes, V. (1993). Modern Fransız Felsefesi. (A. Yardımlı, Çev.) İstanbul:
  9. İdea Yayınları.
  10. Noujain, E. G. (1987). “History as Geneology: An Exploration of Foucault’s Approach to History”, Griffits,. A. P. (Ed.), Contemporary Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Foucault, M. (1987). “Questions of Method”. Bohman, J. ve McCarthy, T.A. (Ed.), After Philosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  12. Miller, J. (2000).
  13. The Passion of Michel Foucault, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  14. Foucault, M. (1972). Archeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row Pub. Foucault, M. (1984). “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History”, Rabinow, P. (Ed.), The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon. Foucault, M. (1988). “What is Enlightenment?”, Robinson, P. ve W.M. Sulliaum, (Ed.), Interpreting Social Science: A Second Look. London: University of California Press.
  15. Foucault, M. (1994). “Geneology and Social Criticism”, Seidman, S. (Ed.), The Postmodern Turn: New Perspective in Social Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Foucault, M. (1994). Dostluğa Dair, (C. Ener Çev.) İstanbul:
  17. Hil Yayınları.
  18. Foucault, M. (2003). Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York: Picado. Foucault, M., (1977).
  19. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Newyork: Cornell University Press.
  20. Foucault, M. (2000). “Hakikat ve İktidar”. Keskin, F. (Ed.), Michel Foucault, Entelektüelin Siyasi İşlevi. İstanbul:
  21. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  22. Gutting, G. (1994). Michel Foucault: A User’s Manual. Gutting, G. (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Gutting, G., (2005). Foucault: a Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  24. Gürbilek, N., Savaşır, İ. (1989). “Foucault’nun Hapishane