Journals / Kriz Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

The Importance of Investigation of Turkish Culture from the Point of View of Cultural Pride

Gurur Toplumu Bakış Açısıyla Türk Kültürünün İncelenmesinin Önemi

Pages
19–25
Publication Date
2006-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, the aim of this paper is to emphasize the importance of cultural pride and to discuss the importance of studying Turkish society in this domain of interest along with a presentation of a review of the issue in this respect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Honor is one’s worth in one’s own eyes and in the eyes of others.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is expressed as having two components: inner and outer honor.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, the aim of this paper is to emphasize the importance of cultural pride and to discuss the importance of studying Turkish society in this domain of interest along with a presentation of a review of the issue in this respect.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gurur · içten içeyaşanan gurur · ele güne karşı yaşanan gurur

Abstract

Honor is one’s worth in one’s own eyes and in the eyes of others. It is expressed as having two components: inner and outer honor. Among Mediterranean and South American honor cultures, it is observed that outer pride is much more important than inner pride. Social Interdependence (includes social bonds such as hospitality or generosity), Collective Honor (priority of family honor), Feminine Honor (includes values such as modesty, hiding one’s sexuality by wearing discreet cloths, and protecting one’s chastity) and Masculine Honor (includes the likeability of such characteristics such as physical power and courage) are among the characteristics of these honor cultures. Another characteristic of honor cultures is that the pride is objectified and perceived as a possession. When the honor is lost it is perceived as being added to the honor of the offender. Thus the individual who is attacked needs to restore his or her honor and acts violently in return. In this course engaging in revenge and committing violence to restore pride are to bee seen frequently. On the other hand, misuse and bribery are offenses yet again frequently seen in these cultures. This situation, which may perhaps be related to the relative insignificance of the inner pride, becomes an important problem. The overdose of pride may lead both individuals and societies to be vulnerable to manipulation in times of crisis. Thus, the aim of this paper is to emphasize the importance of cultural pride and to discuss the importance of studying Turkish society in this domain of interest along with a presentation of a review of the issue in this respect.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNER-ÖZKAN, B., GENÇÖZ, T. (2006). The Importance of Investigation of Turkish Culture from the Point of View of Cultural Pride. Kriz Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 19–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/247574

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bushman BJ, Baumeister RF (1998)
  2. Threatened Egotism, Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and Direct and Displaced Aggression: Does Self-Love or Self-Hate Lead to Violence? J Pers Soc Psychol, 75: 219–229.
  3. Braun F (2001) The Communication of Gender in Turkish. M Hellinger, H Bubmann (eds.), Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men, Amsterdam Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, s. 283-310.
  4. Brown JD, Dutton KA (1995) The Thrill of Victory, the Complexity of Defeat: Self-Esteem and People’s Emotional Reactions to Success and Failure. J Pers Soc Psychol,68: 712-722.
  5. Campbell WK (1999) Narcissism and Romantic Attraction. J Pers Soc Psychol, 77: 1254–1270.
  6. Cohen D, Nibett RE (1994) Self-Protection and the Culture of Honor. Explaining Southern Violence. Per Soc Psychol B, 20: 551-567.
  7. Ekman P (2003) Emotions Revealed. New York: Times Books. Erman T, Kalaycıoğlu S, Rittersberger-Tılıç H (2002) Money Earning Activities and Empowerment Experiences of Rural Migrant Women in the City: The Case of Turkey. Women Stud Int Forum, 25 (4): 395- 410. Fischer AH, Manstead ASR, Rodriguez Mosquera PM (1999) The Role of Honor-Related vs. Individualistic Values in Conceptualing Pride, Shame, and Anger: Spanish and Dutch Cultural Prototypes. Cognition Emotion, 13 (2):149-179.
  8. Gençöz T (2002) Discriminant Validity of Low Positive Affect: Is it Specific to Depression? Pers Indiv Differ, 32: 991-999.
  9. Gençöz T (2000) Pozitif ve Negatif Duygu Durum Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(46): 19-28.
  10. Ghatavi K, Nicolson R, MacDonald C, Osher S, Levitt A (2002) Defining Guilt in Depression: A Comparison of Subjects With Major Depression, Chronic Medical Illness and Healthy Controls. J Affect Disord, 68: 307-315.
  11. Gilbert P (2000)
  12. The Relationship of Shame, Social Anxiety and Depression: The Role of the Evaluation of Social Rank. Clin Psychol Psychot, 7: 174-189.
  13. Gilmore DD (1987) Honor and Shame and the Unity of the Mediterranean. Washington DC. American Antropological Association. Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Holland, D, Quinn N (1987) Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  14. İmamoğlu EO (1991) Interpersonal Consequ- ences of Expressing Personal or Team Affect for Team Success or Falure Among Turkish Students. J Psychol, 125(5): 509-524.
  15. Jansz J (1991)
  16. Person, Self and Moral Demands. Leiden: DSWO Pre