Journals / Kriz Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Evaluating Pharmacological Treatment Options in Elderly Patients With Bipolar Disorder Who Admitted to a University Hospital

Bir üniversite kliniğinde bipolar bozukluk tanısı ile izlenen yaşlı hastalarda farmakolojik tedavi seçimlerinin incelenmesi

Pages
1–12
Publication Date
2011-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Prospective studies about the treatment of BD in the elderly and treatment guidelines in accordance with them are needed. agents (36.4%) and

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the present study is to evaluate pharmacological treatment options, common side effects and treatment compliance in elderly patients with type I Bipolar Disorder (BD) in the light of current literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: The study sample (n=99) consisted of elderly patients (≥65 years old) who admitted to the psychiatry clinic of a university hospital between 2006-2011 and had the diagnosis of BD type-1.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Prospective studies about the treatment of BD in the elderly and treatment guidelines in accordance with them are needed. agents (36.4%) and
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006-2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:antipsikotikler · bipolar bozukluk · geriyatrik psikiyatri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study is to evaluate pharmacological treatment options, common side effects and treatment compliance in elderly patients with type I Bipolar Disorder (BD) in the light of current literature. Method: The study sample (n=99) consisted of elderly patients (≥65 years old) who admitted to the psychiatry clinic of a university hospital between 2006-2011 and had the diagnosis of BD type-1. The patient files were examined and psychotropic agents which were used in the last visit were taken into account. Common side effects and treatment compliance were also evaluated. Results: Mood stabilisers (MS) were used by 74.4% of the patients, followed by second generation antipsychotics (SGAP) (71.7%), hypnotic-sedative andantidepressants (%27.2). Most commonly used MS were lithium (37.4%) and valproic acid (36.4%). 77.7% of the patients were on combination therapy, whereas 22.3% of them were on monotherapy. The most common combination was MS+SGAP (41.4%) and quetiapine was the most commonly used SGAP (41.4%). Tremor, increase in apetite, hypersomnia, forgetfulness, extrapyramidal side effects, gastrointestinal complaints, defatigation, weight gain and headache were the most commonly declared side effects. 8.1% of the patients were fully compliant, 54.5% were compliant, 31.3% were partially compliant and 6% were noncompliant to the treatment. Conclusions: This is the first study in Turkey which evaluated pharmacological treatment options in elderly patients with BD. This study emphasized that combination treatments were commonly preferred, lithium usage was as common as valproic acid, SGAP drugs were frequently preferred and the most common one was quetiapine. 62.6% of the patients had good compliance to the treatment. These results were consistent with previous studies on elderly and young BD patients. Prospective studies about the treatment of BD in the elderly and treatment guidelines in accordance with them are needed. agents (36.4%) and

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı bipolar bozukluğu (BB) olan yaşlı hastalarda tercih edilen psikofarmakolojik tedavileri, görülen başlıca yan etkileri ve ilaç uyumunu ilişkin yazın ışığında ortaya koymaktır.Yöntem: Çalışmanın örneklemini bir üniversite hastanesi psikiyatri kliniğine 2006-2011 yılları arasında başvuran BB Tip 1 tanısı almış, 65 yaş ve üzerinde olan 99 yaşlı hasta oluşturmuştur. Hastaların dosyaları incelenmiş ve her hastanın son kontrolünde kullanmakta olduğu ilaçlar, yan etkiler ve ilaç uyumu değerlendirilmiştir.Bulgular: Hastaların %74.4’ü duygudurum düzenleyici (DDD), %71.7’si ikinci kuşak antipsikotik (İKAP), %36.4’ü hipnotik-sedatif ilaç, %27.2’si ise antidepresan kullanmaktadır. DDD olarak en sık lityum (%37.4) ve valproik asit (%36.4) tercih edilmiştir. Hastaların %77.7’sinde kombinasyon tedavisi, %22.3’ünde monoterapi tercih edilmiştir. En sık (%41.4) DDD+İKAP kombinasyonu, İKAP olarak da hem kombine hem de monoterapide en sık ketiyapin (%41.4) kullanılmaktadır. Bildirilen başlıca yan etkiler tremor, iştah artışı, hipersomni, unutkanlık, ekstrapiramidal yan etkiler, gastrointestinal sistem yakınmaları, halsizlik, kilo artışı, baş ağrısıdır. İlaç

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNÖZ, U., RİFAT, S. İ., HATİP, E., ÇİÇEKLİDAĞ, M., ALTAŞ, M., GÜMÜŞTEKİN, B., KAKAÇ, A., ERGUVAN, T. Ö. K. (2011). Evaluating Pharmacological Treatment Options in Elderly Patients With Bipolar Disorder Who Admitted to a University Hospital. Kriz Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/247550

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aizenberg D, Olmer A, Barak Y (2006) Suicide attempts amongst elderly bipolar patients. J Affect Disord, 91(1):91–94.
  2. Al Jurdi RK, Marangell LB, Petersen NJ, Martinez M, Gyulai L, Sajatovic M (2008) Prescription Patterns of Psychotropic Medications in Elderly Compared to Younger Participants Who Achieved a “Recovered” Status in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD). Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 16(11):922–933.
  3. Aziz R, Lorberg B, Tampi RR (2006) Treatments for Late-Life Bipolar Disorder. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother, 4(4):347-364. BALANCE investigators and collaborators, Geddes JR, Goodwin GM, Rendell J, Azorin JM, Cipriani A, ve ark (2010) Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial. Lancet, 375(9712):385-395.
  4. Beyer JL, Burchitt B, Gersing K, Krishnan KR (2008) Patterns of pharmacotherapy and treatment response in elderly adults with bipolar disorder. Psychopharmacol Bull, 41(1):102–114.
  5. Bhalerao S, Seyfried LS, Kim HM, Chiang C, Kavanagh J, Kales HC (2012). Mortality risk with the life bipolar disorder. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 25(1):29-36.
  6. Cares M, Powers R (1998) Concomitant rash and blood dyscrasias in geriatric psychiatry patients treated with carbamazepine. Ann Pharmacother, 32(9):884-887.
  7. Connolly KR, Thase ME (2011) The clinical management of evidence-based guidelines. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord, 13(4). Depp CA, Jeste DV (2004) Bipolar disorder in older adults: a critical review. Bipolar Disord, 6(5):343–367.
  8. Desai VC, Heaton PC, Kelton CM (2012) Impact of the Food and Drug Administration’s antipsychotic black box warning on psychotropic drug prescribing in elderly patients with dementia in outpatient and office-based settings. Alzheimers Dement, 8(5):453-457.
  9. Fountoulakis KN, Vieta TE. Treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic review of available data and clinical perspectives. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008; 11(7):999-1029.
  10. Fountoulakis KN, Vieta E, Sanchez-Moreno J, Kaprinis SG, Goikolea JM, Kaprinis GS (2005) Treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder: A critical review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 86(1):1–10.
  11. Gareri P, Falconi U, De Fazio P, De Sarro G (2000) Conventional and new antidepressant drugs in the elderly. Prog Neurobiol, 61(4):353-396.
  12. Ghaemi SN, Hsu DJ, Thase ME, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Miyahara S, ve ark (2006) Pharmacological treatment patterns at study entry for the first 500