SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kriz Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Triage Assessment System Crısıs Interventıon

Krize müdahale triyaj değerlendirme sistemi Triage Assessment System Crisis Intervention

Alan MYER RİCK
Neşe ALKAN
Pages
43–54
Publication Date
2012-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

TASCI had been translated to many languages and is frequently used by practitioners, educators and researchers around the world

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Rapid, accurate and multidimensional assessment of a psychological crisis is a prerequisite for timely and effective crisis intervention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The importance of effective assessment of the crisis is also being addressed by related literature because of the assessment’s influence on the course and the development of the crisis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:TASCI had been translated to many languages and is frequently used by practitioners, educators and researchers around the world
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Krize müdahale · kriz değerlendirmesi · triyaj değerlendirme

Abstract

Rapid, accurate and multidimensional assessment of a psychological crisis is a prerequisite for timely and effective crisis intervention. The importance of effective assessment of the crisis is also being addressed by related literature because of the assessment’s influence on the course and the development of the crisis. Unfortunately however, there is no standard and widely used crisis assessment system in Turkey. The purpose of this article to inform the reader about one of the most widely used systems of crisis intervention. Triage Assessment System Crisis Intervention (TASCI) is a real time assessment system by which an in crisis can be assessed on behavioral, affective and cognitive domains. TASCI had been translated to many languages and is frequently used by practitioners, educators and researchers around the world

Özet

Bireysel kriz yaşayan bir bireyin hızlı, etkin ve çok yönlü bir biçimde psikolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi, bu krize hızlı ve doğru müdahale yapılması için bir ön koşuldur. Krize müdahale konusundaki çalışmalarda, etkin bir kriz değerlendirmesi yapılmasının önemi, değerlendirmenin krizin seyrine olan etkisi nedeni ile de sıkça vurgulanmaktadır. Ancak ne yazık ki, ülkemizde standart olarak ve yaygın şekilde kullanılan kriz durumlarına özgü bir değerlendirme sistemi bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, dünyada yaygın olarak kullanılan kriz değerlendirme sistemlerinden biri olan “Krize Müdahale: Triyaj Değerlendirme Sistemi (KMTDS)” hakkında bilgi vermektir. KMTDS, geçerliliği ve güvenirliği kanıtlanmış

🔖

Cite This Article

RİCK, A. M., ALKAN, N. (2012). Triage Assessment System Crısıs Interventıon. Kriz Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 43–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/247517

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aguilera DC (1998) Crisis intervention: Theory and methodology (8th Ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby. Beck AT,Weissman A, Lester D ve ark. (1974) The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale. Psychol, 42(6): 861-865.
  2. J Consult Clin Belkin NJ (1984) Cognitive models and information transfer. Information Studies, 4(2): 111-129.
  3. Social Science Bengelsdorf H, Levy LE, Emerson RL ve ark.(1984) A crisis triage rating scale brief dispositional assessment of patients at risk for hospitalization. J Nerv Ment Dis, 172(7): 424- 430. Blancett J (2008) A reliability and validity study of the Triage Assessment System for Individual in Learning Environments. University of Memphis, Memphis, TN. Brownfield JN (2012) The reliability and validity of the Triage Assessment Scale for Students in Learning Environments: Middle schools (Doctoral Thesis). Available from Proquest Digital Theses database (Record no: 3502768). Butcher JN, Koss MP (1978) Research on brief and crisis-oriented psychotherapies.In S. L. Garfield and A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. New York: John Wiley. Collins BC, Collins TM (2004) Crisis and Trauma: Developmental-ecological intervention. Boston, MA.: Lahaska Press.
  4. Conte C (2005) Examination of the reliability and validity of the Triage Assessment Survey: Organizations. Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA. Dass-Brailsford PA (2007) A practical approach to trauma: Empowering interventions. Publications. Hendricks JE, McKean J, Hendricks CG (2003) Crisis intervention, (3rded). Springfield, Illinois: Thomas Publishers,
  5. Ltd. Hillman JL (2002) Crisis intervention and trauma: New approaches to evidence-based practice. New York: Springer. Hoff M, Hoff LA (2012) Crisis education and service program designs: A guide for administrators, educators, and clinical trainers. Rev. Ed. New York & London: Routledge. James RK, Gilliland BE (2013) Crisis intervention strategies, (7th ed.).Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Jobes DA, Eyman JR, Yufit RI (1995) How clinicians assess suicide risk in adolescents and adults. Crisis Intervention & Time-Limited Treatment, 2 (1): 1-12.
  6. Kanel K (2014) A guide to crisis intervention. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole. Kliman A (1978) Crisis: Psychological first aid for recovery and growth. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston. Lewis S, Roberts AR (2001) Crisis assessment tools: The good, the bad and the available. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 1(1): 17-28.
  7. Linehan MM, Goodstein JL, Nielsen SL ve ark.