SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul İktisat Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 2

-

TÜRKİYE’DE SEKTÖREL İSTİHDAM VE BÖLGESEL KALKINMA İLİŞKİSİ: SHIFT – SHARE (DEĞİŞİM PAYI) ANALİZİ

Merter AKINCI
Ömer YILMAZ
Pages
0
Publication Date
2014-06-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, it can be said that the worst performance have introduced by Northeast and East Anatolia regions in the mentioned period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the context of regional development, besides taking enough shares from employment potential, attracting the employment in the powerful sectors is also important.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore in this study, traditional shift – share analysis is used in order to determine the effects of inter-sectoral employment on regional development process for 26 sub* Arş.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, it can be said that the worst performance have introduced by Northeast and East Anatolia regions in the mentioned period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 – 2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sektörel İstihdam · Bölgesel Kalkınma · Shift – Share Analizi

Abstract

In the context of regional development, besides taking enough shares from employment potential, attracting the employment in the powerful sectors is also important. The changes in the sectoral distribution of employment can also show important differences in the course of time. Therefore in this study, traditional shift – share analysis is used in order to determine the effects of inter-sectoral employment on regional development process for 26 sub* Arş. Gör. Dr., Atatürk Üniversitesi, İ.İ.B.F., İktisat Bölümü, Erzurum. (e-posta: [email protected])** Prof. Dr., Atatürk Üniversitesi, İ.İ.B.F., Ekonometri Bölümü, Erzurum. (e-posta: [email protected])regions in the period of 2004 – 2011. The results of the analysis applied for three main sectors level indicate that the development process is the highest in the sub-regions located in Marmara and Aegean regions. In addition, it is found that following the Marmara and Aegean regions, Central and South Anatolia regions have shown important development process, either. Also, it can be said that the worst performance have introduced by Northeast and East Anatolia regions in the mentioned period.

Özet

Bölgesel kalkınma bağlamında, bölgelerin istihdam potansiyelinden yeterlipay alabilme durumları kadar, güçlü sektörlerde istihdamı çekebilmeleride büyük önem taşımaktadır. İstihdamın sektörel dağılımdaki değişmelerise zamanla önemli farklılıkları yansıtabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, sektörlerarasındaki istihdamın bölgesel kalkınma süreci üzerindeki etkilerini 26 altbölge için 2004 – 2011 döneminde belirleyebilmek amacıyla geleneksel shift– share analizi kullanılmıştır. Üç ana sektör düzeyinde yapılan analiz sonuçları,Marmara ve Ege bölgelerinde bulunan alt bölgelerin kalkınma süreçlerininen yüksek olduğunu göstermiştir. İlaveten, Marmara ve Ege bölgelerinitakiben Orta ve Güney Anadolu bölgelerinin de önemli kalkınma sürecigösterdikleri tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, ilgili dönemde en kötü performansınKuzeydoğu ve Doğu Anadolu bölgeleri tarafından sergilendiği söylenebilir.Anahtar Kelimeler: Sektörel İstihdam, Bölgesel Kalkınma, Shift –Share AnaliziJEL Sınıflandırması: C10, E24, R11, R12THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SECTORAL EMPLOYMENT ANDREGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN TURKEY: SHIFT – SHARE ANALYSISABSTRACTIn the context of regional development, besides taking enough shares fromemployment potential, attracting the employment in the powerful sectors isalso important. The changes in the sectoral distribution of employment canalso show important differences in the course of time. Therefore in this study,traditional shift – share analysis is used in order to determine the effectsof inter-sectoral employment on regional development process for 26 subregions in the period of 2004 – 2011. The results of the analysis applied forthree main sectors level indicate that the development process is the highestin the sub-regions located in Marmara and Aegean regions. In addition, it isfound that following the Marmara and Aegean regions, Central and SouthAnatolia regions have shown important development process, either. Also,it can be said that the worst performance have introduced by Northeast andEast Anatolia regions in the mentioned period.Keywords: Sectoral Employment, Regional Development, Shift –Share AnalysisJEL Classification: C10, E24, R11, R12

🔖

Cite This Article

AKINCI, M., YILMAZ, Ö. (2014). -. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 2, 0. https://ajindex.com/articles/243960

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Altıok, Metin ve Tuncer, İsmail (2011), “Türkiye İmalat Sanayinde Yapısal Değişim ve Üretkenlik: 1980-2008 Dönemi”, Anadolu International Conference in Economics II, June 15-17,
  2. Eskişehir. Arcelus, Francisco J. (1984) “An Extension of Shift-Share Analysis”, Growth and Change, 15(1), pp. 3-8.
  3. Baptista, Rui, Escaria, Vitor and Madruga, Paulo (2008), “Entrepreneurship, Regional Development and Job Creation: The Case of Portugal”, Small Business Economics, 30(1), pp. 49-58.
  4. Baptista, Rui and Preto, Miguel T. (2011), “New Firm Formation and Employment Growth: Regional and Business Dynamics”, Small Business Economics, 36(4), pp. 419-442.
  5. Beceren, Ertan (2003a), Bölgesel Rekabet Gücünün 1980 Sonrası Analizi: Değişim Payı (Shift-Share) Yaklaşımı, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İktisat Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.
  6. Beceren, Ertan (2003b), “Bölgesel Kalkınma Analizlerinde Değişim Payı (Shift-Share) Yaklaşımı”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(3), ss. 27-48.
  7. Berber, Metin (2011), İktisadi Büyüme ve Kalkınma, 4. Baskı,
  8. Derya Kitabevi,
  9. Trabzon. Berzeg, Korhan (1978), “The Empirical Content of Shift – Share Analysis”, Journal of Regional Science, 18(3), pp. 463-468.
  10. Bielik, P. and Rajcaniova, M. (2008), “Shift-Share Analysis of Employment Growth: The Case of the V4 Countries”, Agricultural Economics, 54(8), pp. 347-351.
  11. Bingham, Richard D., Hill, Edward W. and White, Sammis B. (1990), Financing Economic Development: An Institutional Response, Sage Publications, USA. Birch, David L. (1987), Job Creation in America: How Our Smallest Companies Put the Most People to Work, The Free Press,
  12. New York. Blien, Uwe and Wolf, Katja (2002), “Regional Development of Employment in Eastern Germany: An Analysis with an Econometric Analogue to ShiftShare Techniques”, Papers in Regional Science, 81(3), pp. 391-414.
  13. Broersma, Lourens and Gautier, Pieter (1997), “Job Creation and Job Destruction by Small Firms: An Empirical Investigation for the Dutch Manufacturing Sector”, Small Business Economics, 9(3), pp. 211-224.
  14. Carod, Josep M. A., Solis, Daniel L. and Bofarull, Monica M. (2008), “New Business Formation and Employment Growth: Some Evidence for the Spanish Manufacturing Industry”, Small Business Economics, 30(1), pp. 73-84.
  15. Creamer, Daniel (1942), Industrial Location and National Resources, U.S. National Resource Planning Board, Washington. Damesick, Peter J. (1986), “Service Industries, Employment