Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

A Review of Foreign Language Teachers’ Assessment Literacy

Yabancı Dil Öğretmenlerinin Değerlendirme Okuryazarlığının İncelenmesi

Pages
628–650
Publication Date
2019-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review article indicates the general view on EFL teachers’ LAL level and makes suggestions in developing language assessment literacy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to review studies about foreign / second language teachers’ language assessment literacy (LAL) from 1987 to 2019.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of this study, 82 research studies and articles are investigated in the national and international spheres.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review article indicates the general view on EFL teachers’ LAL level and makes suggestions in developing language assessment literacy.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:dil · değerlendirme · değerlendirme okuryazarlığı

Abstract

This study aims to review studies about foreign / second language teachers’ language assessment literacy (LAL) from 1987 to 2019. Within the scope of this study, 82 research studies and articles are investigated in the national and international spheres. Perceptions of assessment literacy are unpacked to find out language teachers’ background and needs in LAL. Subtopics are determined to categorize the research studies as assessment courses, teachers’ knowledge base in language assessment, their beliefs and practices in language assessment, their training needs in assessment, professional development in LAL, perceptions in LAL, and effect of LAL and curriculum on exam preparation. This review article indicates the general view on EFL teachers’ LAL level and makes suggestions in developing language assessment literacy.

Özet

Bu çalışmada ikinci / yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin dil değerlendirme okuryazarlığı (DDO) hakkında 1987’den 2019 yılına kadar olan çalışmaların gözden geçirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu çalışma kapsamında, uluslararası ve milli alanlarda toplam 82 araştırma çalışması ve makale incelenmiştir. Dil öğretmenlerinin DDO hakkında temellerini ve ihtiyaçlarını ortaya çıkarmak için değerlendirme okuryazarlığı üzerine kavramlar ayrıntılı incelenmiştir. Araştırma çalışmalarını kategorilere ayırmak için alt başlıklar: değerlendirme dersleri, dil değerlendirmede öğretmenlerin bilgi tabanı, öğretmenlerin dil değerlendirmede düşünce ve uygulamaları, öğretmenlerin değerlendirmede eğitim ihtiyaçları, DDO’ nda profesyonel gelişim, dil değerlendirmesi kavramları, ve DDO ve müfredatın sınav hazırlığına etikisi olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu derleme makalesi İngilizce’ yi yabancı il olarak öğreten öğretmenlerin DDO üzerine genel görüşü belirlemektedir ve DDO gelişimi üzerine önerilerde bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİŞMAN, E. P., BÜYÜKKARCI, K. (2019). A Review of Foreign Language Teachers’ Assessment Literacy. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 628–650. https://ajindex.com/articles/240282

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aksu Ataç, B. (2012). Foreign language teachers’ attitude toward authentic assessment in language teaching. The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8(2), 719. Arias, C., & Maturana, L. (2005). Evaluación en lenguas extranjeras: discursos y prácticas [Assessment in language teaching: Discourse and practices]. Íkala, Revista de Lenguajey Cultura, 10(1) 63-91.
  2. Bailey, K. M. & Brown, J. D. (1996). Language testing courses: What are they? In A. Cumming & R. Berwick (Eds.), Validation in language testing, 236-256.
  3. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Berry, V., Sheehan, S., Munro, S. (2019, April). What does language assessment literacy mean to teachers? ELT Journal 73 (2), 113-123. doi:10.1093/elt/ccy055 Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 3–31.
  4. Brown, J. D. & Bailey, K. M. (2008). Language testing courses: What are they in 2007? Language Testing, 25(3), 349-383. doi: 10.1177/0265532208090157 Büyükkarcı, K. (2014). Assessment beliefs and practices of language teachers in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 7(1), 107-120.
  5. Büyükkarcı, K. (2016). Identifying the areas for English language teacher development: A study of assessment literacy. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 6(3), 333346. Campbell, C., Murphy, J. A. & Holt, J. K. (2002). Psychometric analysis of an assessment literacy instrument: Applicability to pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, OH. Chan, Y-C. (2008). Elementary school EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of multiple assessments. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 7(1), 37-62.
  6. Cheng, L., Rogers, T., & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21(3), 360-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt288oa.
  7. Coombe, C. A. 1., Folse, K. S., & Hubley, N. J. (2007). A practical guide to assessing English language learners. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan. Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). The case for university-based teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, K. E. Demers, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd edition), 333 – 346. New York: Routledge and Association of Teacher Educators. Davidheiser, S. (2013). Identifying Areas for High School Teacher Development: A Study of Assessment Lit