SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 23

Comparison Between English and Turkish Primary School Teachers In Terms of Value Education : A Sample From Lancashire and Samsun

İngiltere ve Türkiye’deki Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ‘Değer Eğitimi’ Açısından Karşılaştırılması: Lancashire – Samsun Örneği

Yücel ÖKSÜZ
Pages
141–171
Publication Date
2014-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Resultsretrieved from the study were commented and several suggestions were made basedon the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, it was aimed to compare the applications about the value education in Turkey and England based on primary school teachers views. 10 primary school teachers from Turkey and 11 primary school teachers from England, totally 21 primary school teachers participated in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Phenomenological study, one of the qualitative research approaches, was employed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Resultsretrieved from the study were commented and several suggestions were made basedon the literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Değer Eğitimi · Öğretmen Eğitimi · Değer Eğitiminde Planlama

Abstract

In the study, it was aimed to compare the applications about the value education in Turkey and England based on primary school teachers views. 10 primary school teachers from Turkey and 11 primary school teachers from England, totally 21 primary school teachers participated in the study. Phenomenological study, one of the qualitative research approaches, was employed. The interview form was developed by the researcher based on literature review. Semi-structured interview with the participant teachers was used to collect data. Data from the teachers working both of the countries was analysed descriptively through content analysis. Themes from the descriptive analyses were compared and same themes were identified. Resultsretrieved from the study were commented and several suggestions were made basedon the literature.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı İngiltere ve Türkiye’de değer eğitimine yönelik uygulamaları sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşlerine dayanarak karşılaştırmalı şekilde ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmaya İngiltere Lancashire bölgesinde görev yapan 10 sınıf öğretmeni, Türkiye’de Samsun ilinde görev yapan 11 sınıf öğretmeni olmak üzere çalışmaya 21 sınıf öğretmeni katılmıştır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yönteminin olgusal çalışma tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmacı tarafından literatüre dayalı olarak görüşme formu geliştirilmiştir. Yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşme ile veriler toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, betimsel olarak içerik analizine tabii tutulmuştur ve temalar belirlenmiştir. Her iki ülke sınıf öğretmenlerinden elde edilen verilerden geliştirilen temalarda benzerlik vefarklılıklar tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar ile yorumlanmış ve önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖKSÜZ, Y. (2014). Comparison Between English and Turkish Primary School Teachers In Terms of Value Education : A Sample From Lancashire and Samsun. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 23, 141–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/239721

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akbaş, O. (2004) Türk Milli Eğitim Sisteminin Duyuşsal Amaçlarının İlköğretim İkinci (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. Gerçekleşme Derecesinin Değerlendirilmesi Akbaş, O. (2008). Değer Eğitimi Akımlarına Genel Bir Bakış, Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 16, 9-27.
  2. Arthur, J. (2005). The Re-Emergence of Character Education in British Education Policy, British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(3), 239-254.
  3. Baydar, P. (2009) İlköğretim 5. Sınıf Sosyal Bilgiler Programında Belirlenen Değerlerin Kazanım Düzeyleri Ve Bu Süreçte Yaşanılan Sorunların Değerlendirilmesi (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. Buzelli, C.A. (1992) Young Children’ S Moral Understanding: Learning about Right and Wrong, Young Children, 47(6), 47-53.
  4. Cornbleth, C. (1990). Curriculum in Context.London: Falmer Press.
  5. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design:Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Crick, B. (1999). Essasy on Citizenship. London: Continuum Press.
  6. Davies, I., Gorrard, S. ve McGuinn, N. (2005). Citizenshıp Education and Character Education: Similarities and Contrasts. British Journal of Education, 35(1), 341-358. doi: 0.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00299.x Deno, S.L. (2003). Developments in Curriculum Based Measurement, The Journal 10.1177/00224669030370030801. Education, 37(3), 184-192. doi: Dunn, J. (1988) The Development of Social Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Giroux, H. ve Purpel D. (Ed.) (1983) The Hidden Curriculum and Moral Education: Deception or Discovery?. California: McCutchen Publishing. Hallam, S. (2009). An Evaluation pf the Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL) Programme: Promoting Positive Behavior, Effective Learning and Well-Being In Primary School Children. Oxford Review of Education, 35 (3), 313-330. Doi: 10.1080/03054980902934597 Halstead, J.M. ve Taylor, M.J. (2000). Learning and Teaching about Values: A Review of Recent Research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30 (2), 169- 202. doi: 10.1080/713657146 Hatch, J.A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. New York: State University of New York Press.
  8. Kirschenbaum, H. (1995). 100 Ways to Enhance Values and Morality in School and Youth Settings. USA: Allyn & Bacon. Kuebli, J. (1994) Young Children’s Understanding of Everyday Emotions, Young Children, 49(3), 36-47.
  9. Kumar, G. ve Pandey, J. (2012) How Indian and Western Te