Journals / Research Journal of Business and Management / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

EFFECTS OF PATERNALISTIC LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION: MEDIATING ROLE OF TRUST IN LEADER

PATERNALİST LİDERLİĞİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: LİDERE GÜVENİN ARACILIK ROLÜ

Pages
73–87
Publication Date
2016-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The path analysis findings indicated that trust in leader mediates the relationship of benevolent leadership and identification.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Leadership as a topic holds an important place in literature in the area of organization and management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the other hand, recent research has frequently demonstrated that the leadership model based on paternalism phenomenon which reflects the dominant cultural characteristics of eastern societies is highly effective in those societies (Pellegrini et al., 2010).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The path analysis findings indicated that trust in leader mediates the relationship of benevolent leadership and identification.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Paternalizm · paternalist liderlik · lidere güven

Abstract

Leadership as a topic holds an important place in literature in the area of organization and management. Despite the research on managerial approaches and practices based on the cultural characteristics of western societies is abundant, the research reflecting cultural characteristics of eastern societies in the same field is scarce. On the other hand, recent research has frequently demonstrated that the leadership model based on paternalism phenomenon which reflects the dominant cultural characteristics of eastern societies is highly effective in those societies (Pellegrini et al., 2010). As substantial amount of studies show paternalistic leadership phenomenon is also a positive cultural value in our country. It is important to investigate the effects of this phenomenon on different affective and cognitive mechanisms that lead to positive employee behaviours. Regarding this, the purpose of this study is to examine the mediating role of trust in the leader on the effect of paternalistic leadership on organizational identification. The data is collected from 148 employees who work in three different industries in İzmir. The path analysis findings indicated that trust in leader mediates the relationship of benevolent leadership and identification. These findings compatible with hypothetical model.Keywords: Paternalism, paternalistic leadership, trust in leader, organizational identification, SEM.JEL Classification: M10, D23, M50

Özet

Örgüt ve yönetim araştırmalarının temel çalışma alanlarından birini teşkil eden liderlik araştırmaları alan yazında önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Ancak, batı toplumlarının kültürel özelliklerine dayalı etik bağlamdaki yönetsel anlayış ve uygulamalara ilişkin araştırmalar yaygın olmasına karşın, doğu toplumlarının kültürel özelliklerini yansıtan emik araştırmalar oldukça yetersizdir. Bununla birlikte son yıllardaki araştırmalarda, doğu toplumlarının baskın kültürel özelliğini yansıtan paternalizm olgusuna dayalı bir liderlik modelinin bu toplumlarda daha etkili olduğu sıklıkla ifade edilmektedir. Ülkemizde de olumlu bir kültürel değeri yansıttığı bir çok araştırmada ortaya konan paternalist liderlik olgusunun, işgörenleri olumlu iş davranışları sergilemeye yönlendiren farklı duyuşsal, bilişsel ve tutumsal mekanizmaları ne yönde etkilediğinin araştırılması bu açıdan önem arz etmektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, paternalist liderliğin örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisinde lidere güvenin aracılık rolünü incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada veriler, İzmir ilindeki üç farklı endüstrideki 148 çalışan üzerinden kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile toplanmıştır. Araştırma amacı doğrultusunda, path (yol) analizi bulguları, paternalist liderlik boyutlarından yardımseverlik ile özdeşleşme ilişkisinde varsayımlanan modele uygun olarak lidere güvenin aracılık rolü olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ciraklar, N., Ucar, Z., Sezgin, O. (2016). EFFECTS OF PATERNALISTIC LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION: MEDIATING ROLE OF TRUST IN LEADER. Research Journal of Business and Management, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 73–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/238932

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F. 1989, “Social Identity Theory and the Organization”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, no. 1, pp.20-39.
  2. Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E. & Dutton, J. E. 2000, “Organizational Identity and Identification: Charting New Waters and Building New Bridges”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp.13-17.
  3. Aycan, Z. 2006, “Paternalism: Towards Conceptual Refinement and Operationalization”, Yang, K.S., Hwang, K.K., & Kim, U. (Der.), Scientific Advances in Indigenous Psychologies: Empirical, Philosophical, and Cultural Contributions (pp.445-466), London: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. 2000, “Impact of Culture on Human Resource Management Practices: A 10‐Country Comparison”, Applied Psychology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp.192-221.
  5. Aycan, Z., & Kabasakal, H. 2006, “Social Contract and Perceived Justice of Workplace Practices to Cope with Financial Crisis”, Group & Organization Management, vol. 31, no. 4, pp.469-502.
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986, “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp.1173-1182
  7. Börekçi, D. Y. 2009, “Paternalist Leadership Style’s Evolution in E-Culture”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 38, no. 2, pp.103-109.
  8. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. 2005, “Ethical Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective for Construct Development and Testing”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 97, no. 2, pp.117-134.
  9. Bunker, B. B., Alban, B. T., & Lewicki, R. J. 2004, “Ideas in Currency and OD Practice Has the Well Gone Dry?”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 40, no. 4, pp.403-422.
  10. Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. 2007, “Trust in Leadership: A Multi-Level Review and Integration”, The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 6, pp.606-632.
  11. Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. 2014, “Affective Trust in Chinese Leaders Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Employee Performance”, Journal of Management, vol. 40, no. 3, pp.796-819.
  12. Cheng, B.S.,Chou, L.F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M.P. & Farh, J.L. 2004, “Paternalistic Leadership and Subordinate Responses: Establishing A Leadership Model in Chinese Organizations”, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp.89–117.
  13. Cheng, M. Y., & Wang, L. 201