SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Research Journal of Business and Management / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

A RESEARCH ON VALUES POSSESSED BY UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Erkan TASKİRAN
Canan CETİN
Tulay DEMİRALAY
Baki AKSU
Mehmet Emin OKUR
Burcak VATANSEVER
H. Necla KELES
Pages
113–125
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it was found out that value types of students differ according to their demographic characteristics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose - This study was conducted to investigate the value types possessed by university students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology - Portrait Values Questionnaire was employed to 328 students studying in a private and a public university located in Istanbul within the sample of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it was found out that value types of students differ according to their demographic characteristics.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Values · portrait value questionnaire · university

Abstract

Purpose - This study was conducted to investigate the value types possessed by university students. Moreover, it was aimed at examining whether value types of students differ in terms of their demographic characteristics. Methodology - Portrait Values Questionnaire was employed to 328 students studying in a private and a public university located in Istanbul within the sample of the study. Gathering data were analyzed via means, standard deviation, frequency and percentage analysis within descriptive analyses and non-parametric analyses such as Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis were used to analyze diversities in terms of demographic characteristics. Findings- . Findings gathered from research were revealed that students mostly identified themselves with universalism, security and selfdirection values whereas they identified themselves with power value at least. In addition, it was found out that value types of students differ according to their demographic characteristics. Conclusion- In light of findings, a conclusion can be drawn as individuals tend to overcome their selfish concerns rather than try to achieve their own personal interests and goals to protect the prosperity of society and the existence of nature.

🔖

Cite This Article

TASKİRAN, E., CETİN, C., DEMİRALAY, T., AKSU, B., OKUR, M. E., VATANSEVER, B., KELES, H. N. (2017). A RESEARCH ON VALUES POSSESSED BY UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Research Journal of Business and Management, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 113–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/238835

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Asan, T., Ekşi, F., Doğan, A. & Ekşi, H. 2011, “Bireysel Değerler Envanteri’nin Dilsel Eşdeğerlik Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”, Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Vol. 27, pp. 15-38.
  2. Aydın, M. 2003, “Gençlerin Değer Algısı: Konya Örneği”, Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, Vol. 3, pp.121-144.
  3. Bacanlı, H. 1999, “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Değer Tercihleri”, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, Vol. 2, Güz, pp. 597-611.
  4. Bal, A.E., Çetinaslan A.S. & Cihan Ç.S. 2016, “Personality, Values and Career Concerns As Individual Antecedents of Workplace Influence Tactics”, Global Media Journal: Turkish Edition, Vol. 7, No. 13, pp. 63-85.
  5. Ballı, E. & Koca, B.İ. 2014, “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Bireysel Değerleri ve Girişimcilik Eğilimleri”, Çukurova Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Vol. 18, No.1, pp. 101-121.
  6. Başçiftçi, F., Güleç, N., Akdoğan, T. & Koç, Z. 2011, “Öğretmen Adaylarının Değer Tercihleri İle Epistemolojik İnançlarının İncelenmesi”, 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 27-29
  7. Nisan, Antalya, pp. 629-638.
  8. Başol, O., Bilge, E. & Kuzgun, Ş. 2012, “Öğrencilerin Kariyer Değerlerini Etkileyen Unsurların Tespitine Yönelik Bir Araştırma: Bireysel Değerler”, Electornic Journal of Vocational Colleges, Aralık Sayısı, pp. 57-68.
  9. Bulut, S. S. 2012, “Gazi Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin Değer Yönelimleri”, Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 216-238.
  10. Büyükbeşe, T. & Özdemir, A. 2016, “Individual and Organizational Values at Universities and the Perceptions of University Students on “Management With Values” Concept”, Journal of International Social Research, Vol.9, No. 47, pp.743-754.
  11. Demirutku, K. & Sümer, N. 2010, “Temel Değerlerin Ölçümü: Portre Değerler Anketinin Türkçe Uyarlaması”, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Vol. 13, No. 25, pp. 17-25.
  12. Dilmaç, B., Deniz, M. & Deniz, M.E. 2009, “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Özanlayışları ile Değer Tercihlerinin İncelenmesi”, Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, Vol. 7, No. 18, pp. 9-24.
  13. Dilmaç, B., Bozgeyikli, H. & Çıkılı, Y. 2008, “Öğretmen Adaylarının Değer Algılarının Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi”, Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, Vol. 6, No. 16, pp. 69-91.
  14. Doğan, B. 2007,
  15. Örgüt Kültürü, İstanbul:
  16. Beta Yayınları.
  17. Fitcher, J. 2002, Sosyoloji Nedir? Çev: Nilgün Çelebi, Ankara:
  18. Anı Yayıncılık. Güney, S. 2011, Davranış Bilimleri, 6.Basım, Ankara:
  19. Nobel Yayıncılık. Hofstede, G. 2001, Culture’s Consequences: Comparing, Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Ac