SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Research Journal of Business and Management / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

CORE VISION, STRATEGIC VISION AND VISIONARY LEADERSHIP: A QUALITATIVE FIELD STUDY BY MINTZBERG TYPOLOGY

VİZYON ÇEKİRDEĞİ, STRATEJİK VİZYON VE VİZYONER LİDERLİK: MINTZBERG TİPOLOJİSİYLE NİTEL BİR ALAN ARAŞTIRMASI

Pınar ACAR
Zafer ACAR
Pages
175–184
Publication Date
2019-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, strategic vision alone is not enough for enterprises to have sustainable competitive advantage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose - The aim of our study is to reveal the existence and difference of the concepts of strategic vision, visionary leadership and core vision that have been tried to be differentiated since the study of Westlet and Mintzberg (1989).Methodology - Qualitative research method was used based on the discourses of strategic leaders of logistic enterprises which operate as an important support function at strategic level.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were analyzed with Nvivo 12 program.Findings- The results of word tree analyzes of R & D, new and project concepts that emerged in the context of our research as a result of frequency analysis are supportive as they point to the basic concepts that form the core vision of the sector in our research field.Conclusion- Survival in a chaotic and complex global business world highlights strategic leaders and their strategic visions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, strategic vision alone is not enough for enterprises to have sustainable competitive advantage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Vizyon çekirdeği · vizyoner liderlik · stratejik vizyon

Abstract

Purpose - The aim of our study is to reveal the existence and difference of the concepts of strategic vision, visionary leadership and core vision that have been tried to be differentiated since the study of Westlet and Mintzberg (1989).Methodology - Qualitative research method was used based on the discourses of strategic leaders of logistic enterprises which operate as an important support function at strategic level. Data were analyzed with Nvivo 12 program.Findings- The results of word tree analyzes of R & D, new and project concepts that emerged in the context of our research as a result of frequency analysis are supportive as they point to the basic concepts that form the core vision of the sector in our research field.Conclusion- Survival in a chaotic and complex global business world highlights strategic leaders and their strategic visions. However, strategic vision alone is not enough for enterprises to have sustainable competitive advantage.

Özet

Amaç – Bu çalışmanın amacı Westlet ve Mintzberg’in (1989) çalışmasından bu yana birbirinden ayrıştırılmaya çalışılan stratejik vizyon, vizyoner liderlik ve vizyon çekirdeği kavramlarının varlığını ve farklılığını ortaya çıkarmaktır.Yöntem - Küresel iş dünyasında stratejik düzeyde önemli bir destek fonksiyonu olarak faaliyet gösteren lojistik işletmelerinin stratejik liderlerinin söylemleri temel alınarak nitel araştırma yöntemiyle betimlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Veriler Nvivo 12 programı ile analiz edilmiştir.Bulgular- Frekans analizi sonucu araştırmamız bağlamında ortaya çıkan ar-ge, yeni ve proje kavramlarının kelime ağacı analizlerinin sonuçları, araştırma alanımızdaki sektörün vizyon çekirdeğini oluşturan temel kavramlara işaret etmesi nedeniyle çalışmanın varsayımlarını destekleyici niteliktedir.Sonuç- Kaotik ve karmaşık bir çevre olan küresel iş dünyası içerisinde hayatta kalma zorunluluğu stratejik liderler ve onların stratejik vizyonunu ön plana çıkarmaktadır. Ancak stratejik vizyon işletmelerin sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajına sahip olmaları için tek başına yeterli değildir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACAR, P., ACAR, Z. (2019). CORE VISION, STRATEGIC VISION AND VISIONARY LEADERSHIP: A QUALITATIVE FIELD STUDY BY MINTZBERG TYPOLOGY. Research Journal of Business and Management, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 175–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/238765

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Archbald, D. (2013). Vision and Leadership: Problem-based Learning as a Teaching Tool. Journal of Leadership Education, 12(2), 136–147.
  2. Avolio, B. J. ve Bass, B. M. (1988). Transformational leadership, charisma and beyond. In J.G. Hunt, B.R.Baliga, H.P.Dachler, & C.A.Schriesheim (eds.), Emerging Leadership Vistas. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath. Avery, G. C. (2004). Paradigms of leadership: Theory and cases. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Bakkalcı, C.A. (2013). Yeni Yeni Ticaret Teorileri’nin Makroekonomik Doğası ve Türk Ekonomisi. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(22), s.69-98.
  3. Bakkalcı, A. C. ve Argın, N. (2013). Internalization of Foreign Trade in the Context of Labor Market Induced by Foreign Investment. Journal of Labour Relations, 4(1), s.71-97.
  4. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
  5. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A.B., Hetland, J., Demerouti, E., Olsen, O.K ve Espevik, R. (2014). Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, s.138-157.
  6. Bennis, W. (1997).
  7. On Becoming a Leader, Perseus Press,
  8. Jackson, TN. Burtis, J.O. ve Pond-Burtis, K. L. (2001). Communication and experiential education. Journal of Arts and Sciences in Career and Experiential Education, 1, 4-13.
  9. Cheema, S., Akram, A. ve Javed, F. (2015). Employee Engagement and Visionary Leadership: Impact on Customer and Employee Satisfaction. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 7(2). Conger, J. A. (1991). Inspiring others: The language of leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 5(1), s.31-45.
  10. Corbin, J. M. ve Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), s.3-21.
  11. Daft, R. L. (2005).
  12. The leadership experience. Mason, Ohio: Thomson South-Western. Dhammika, K. A. S. (2014). Visionary Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: An Assessment of Impact of Sectarian Difference. Proceedings of the First Middle East Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Banking. (ME14 DUBAI Conference) Dubai, 10-12.
  13. Ilgar, M. Z. ve Ilgar, S. C. (2013). Nitel bir araştırma deseni olarak gömülü teori (Temellendirilmiş Kuram). Erişim Tarihi: 14.09.2018, Erişim Linki: http://www.izu.edu.tr/Assets/Content/File/Enstitu_Sekreterligi/2013_Guz_Donemi_M_Zeki_ilgar_ve_Semra_Cosgun_ilgar.pdf
  14. IMD (2017). World Competitiveness Yearbook 2017. IMD (International Institute for Management) World Competitiveness Center.