Journals / Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

SURVEY ON MILITARY OPERATIONS OF FUZZY SET THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS

BULANIK KÜMELER TEORİSİ VE UYGULAMALARININ ASKERİ OPERASYONLAR ÜZERİNE ARAŞTIRMALARI

Pages
117–141
Publication Date
2020-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, a detailed literature review of fuzzy decision making problems applied in the military are conducted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, with the increase in investment in countries' military expenditures, the importance of decision-making problems in the military has gradually increased.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There are various uncertainties such as vagueness, imprecise or ambiguous in decision-making problems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, a detailed literature review of fuzzy decision making problems applied in the military are conducted.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Askeri Uygulamalar · Bulanık Kümeler · Çok-Kriterli Karar Verme

Abstract

In recent years, with the increase in investment in countries' military expenditures, the importance of decision-making problems in the military has gradually increased. There are various uncertainties such as vagueness, imprecise or ambiguous in decision-making problems. Decision making is the process of evaluating environmental factors from a holistic perspective, identifying problems and possible alternatives, making a systematic assessment, and identifying the most appropriate decision among them. The aim of this study is to investigate various types of fuzzy set that can be used in military problems under uncertainty. In addition, a detailed literature review of fuzzy decision making problems applied in the military are conducted.

Özet

Son yıllarda ülkelerin askeri harcamalarına yapılan yatırımların artmasıyla birlikte ordudaki karar alma sorunlarının önemi giderek artmıştır. Karar verme problemlerinde muğlaklık, kesin olmayan veya iki anlamlı gibi çeşitli belirsizlikler vardır. Karar verme, çevresel faktörleri bütüncül bir bakış açısıyla değerlendirme, sorunları ve olası alternatifleri belirleme, sistematik bir değerlendirme yapma ve aralarında en uygun kararı belirleme sürecidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, belirsizlik altındaki askeri problemlerde kullanılabilecek çeşitli bulanık set türlerini incelemektir. Ayrıca, orduda uygulanan bulanık karar verme problemlerinin ayrıntılı bir literatür taraması yapılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEVECİ, M., KUVVETLİ, Y., AKYURT, İ. Z. (2020). SURVEY ON MILITARY OPERATIONS OF FUZZY SET THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS. Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 117–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/237759

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Afful-Dadzie, E., Oplatkova, Z. K., & Prieto, L. A. B. (2017). “Comparative state-of-the-art survey of classical fuzzy set and intuitionistic fuzzy sets in multi-criteria decision making”, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(3), 726-738.
  2. Arulkumaran, G., & Gnanamurthy, R. K. (2019). “Fuzzy trust approach for detecting black hole attack in mobile adhoc network”, Mobile Networks and Applications, 24(2), 386-393.
  3. Ashtiani, B., Haghighirad, F., Makui, A., & ali Montazer, G. (2009). “Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets”, Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 457-461.
  4. Bean, W. L., Joubert, J. W., & Luhandjula, M. K. (2016). “Inventory management under uncertainty: A military application”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 96, 96-107.
  5. Braathen, S., & Sendstad, O. J. (2004). “A hybrid fuzzy logic/constraint satisfaction problem approach to automatic decision making in simulation game models”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 34(4), 1786-1797.
  6. Bustince Sola, H., Fernandez, J., Hagras, H., Herrera, F., Pagola, M., & Barrenechea, E. (2014). “Interval type-2 fuzzy sets are generalization of interval-valued fuzzy sets: Toward a wider view on their relationship”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 23(5), 1876-1882.
  7. Cheng, C. H. (1999). “Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers”, Fuzzy sets and systems, 107(1), 25-35.
  8. David, V. R., Octavio, G. R., David, B. M., & Victor, E. C. (2015, July). Analysis, Design, and Implementation of an Autopilot for Unmanned Aircraft-UAV's Based on Fuzzy Logic. In Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Aided System Engineering (pp. 196-201).
  9. IEEE. Deveci, M., Akyurt, I. Z., & Yavuz, S. (2018). “A GIS-based interval type-2 fuzzy set for public bread factory site selection”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management. Eyoh, I., John, R., De Maere, G., & Kayacan, E. (2018). “Hybrid learning for interval type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy logic systems as applied to identification and prediction problems”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(5), 2672-2685. Figueroa García, J. C. (2015). “On the fuzzy extension principle for LP problems with Interval Type-2 Technological Coefficients”, Ingeniería, 20(1), 101-110. Grattan-Guinness, “Fuzzy membership mapped onto interval and many-valuedquantities”, Z. Math. Logik Grundlag. Mathe. 22 (1975) 149–160.
  10. Haesebrouck, T. (2017). “NATO burden sharing in Libya: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis”, Journal of confl