✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
Pröhle’s work consists of two parts: I.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is the translation from Hungarian into Turkish of the article named “Baskir Nyelvtanulmányok” written by Vilmos Pröhle, a Hungarian orientalist who conveyed that he made notes in relation to Bashkir language based on the experiences of his expedition in Ufa region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study is the translation from Hungarian into Turkish of the article named “Baskir Nyelvtanulmányok” written by Vilmos Pröhle, a Hungarian orientalist who conveyed that he made notes in relation to Bashkir language based on the experiences of his expedition in Ufa region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pröhle’s work consists of two parts: I.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ufa · Bashkir Turkish · phonetics
Abstract
This study is the translation from Hungarian into Turkish of the article named “Baskir Nyelvtanulmányok” written by Vilmos Pröhle, a Hungarian orientalist who conveyed that he made notes in relation to Bashkir language based on the experiences of his expedition in Ufa region. Pröhle’s work consists of two parts: I. Phonetics and II. Morphology.
Özet
Bu çalışma, Macar oryantalist Vilmos Pröhle’nin Ufa bölgesine yaptığı inceleme gezisindeki deneyimlerine dayanarak, Başkurt Türkçesi ile ilgili tutmuş olduğu notlarını aktardığı “Baskir Nyelvtanulmányok” adlı makalesinin Macarcadan Türkçeye çevirisidir.[2] Pröhle’nin çalışması iki bölümden oluşmaktadır: I. Ses Bilgisi ve II. Biçim Bilgisi.
🔖
Cite This Article
ARSLAN, H. Ç. (2017). The Linguistic Studies of Bashkir. Çukurova Üniversitesi Türkoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 263–294. https://ajindex.com/articles/236405