SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet / 2006 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

EFFECTS OF THE SOCIO¬ CULTURAL FACTORS IN THE PERCEPTION OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: A CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY AT TURKISH AND YAKUT-SAKHA SOCIETIES

İşyerinde Cinsel Tacizin Algılanmasında Sosyo-Kültürel Faktörlerin Etkisi: Türk Ve Yakut-Saha Toplumları Üzerine Kültürlerarası Bir İnceleme

Mahmut ARSLAN
Maria VASİLYEVA
Mustafa KILIÇ
Doğan Nadi LEBLEBİCİ
Mehmet Devrim AYDIN
M. Kemal ÖKTEM
Pages
71–90
Publication Date
2006-04-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings o f the research demonstrate statistically significant differ­ences between Turkish and Yakut-Sakha groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Perception o f sexual harassment in the workplace is closely related to a person’s socio-cultural background.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims at contributing to the sexual harassment literature by a cross-cultural empirical study in the field o f effects o f socio-cultural factors on perception.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings o f the research demonstrate statistically significant differ­ences between Turkish and Yakut-Sakha groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cinsel taciz · sosyo¬kültürelfaktörler · Sexual harassment

Abstract

Perception o f sexual harassment in the workplace is closely related to a person’s socio-cultural background. This study aims at contributing to the sexual harassment literature by a cross-cultural empirical study in the field o f effects o f socio-cultural factors on perception. In the first part o f the study, a comprehensive literature re­view on sexual harassment is presented. In the second part, by conducting a field study, the differences in the perception o f sexual harassment in the workplace be­tween Turkish and Yakut-Sakha (a member o f the Russian Federation) participants were investigated. Findings o f the research demonstrate statistically significant differ­ences between Turkish and Yakut-Sakha groups.

Özet

İşyerinde cinsel tacizin bireyler tarafından algılanması, sosyo-kültürel geçmişleri İle yakından ilgilidir. Bu çalışma, cinsel taciz algısında sosyo-kültürel faktörlerin etkileri konusundaki literatüre, kültürlerarası bir araştırma İle katkıda bulunmayı amaçla­maktadır. İlk bölümde konuya ilişkin litera­tür, kapsamlı bir şekilde sunulmuş, ardın­dan Rusya Federasyonu ‘na bağlı bir devlet olan Yakut-Saha Cumhuriyeti ve Türki­ye ’de gerçekleştirilen bir alan araştırması İle işyerinde cinsel tacizin algılanmasında­ki farklılıklar araştırılmıştır. Çalışma bul­guları, Türk ve Yakut-Saha katılımcıları arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı fark­lıklar olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, M., VASİLYEVA, M., KILIÇ, M., LEBLEBİCİ, D. N., AYDIN, M. D., ÖKTEM, M. K. (2006). EFFECTS OF THE SOCIO¬ CULTURAL FACTORS IN THE PERCEPTION OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: A CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY AT TURKISH AND YAKUT-SAKHA SOCIETIES. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 71–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/23586

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abbey, A. (1982) "Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendli¬ness?”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830-838.
  2. Adelman, I. and Morris, C. T. 1967, So¬ciety, Politics and Economic Develop¬ment: A Quantitative Approach, Balti¬more: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  3. Baker, D. D, Terpstra D. E., Cutler B. D. (1990) "Perceptions of sexual harass¬ment: A re-examination of gender differ¬ences”, Journal of Psychology, 124, 409- 416. Bakırcı, K. (2000),
  4. İşyerinde Cinsel Taciz, Yasa Yayınları,
  5. İstanbul.
  6. Baroni, B. J. (1992) "Unwelcome Ad¬vances (Sexual Harassment in the Workplace)", Training & Development, 46(5) 19-21.
  7. Bern, S. L. (1974) "The measurement of psychological androgyny”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 155-162.
  8. Blumenthal, J. A. (1998) “The reason¬able woman standard: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in percep¬tions of sexual harassment”, Law and Human Behavior, 22, 33-57.
  9. Bursik, K. (1992) “Perceptions of Sexual Harassment in an Academic Context", Sex Roles, 27(7-8) 401-412.
  10. Coles, F. S. (1986) "Forced to Quit: Sex¬ual Harassment Complaints and Agency Response”, Sex Roles, 14, 81-95.
  11. Cortina, L. and Wasti, S. A. (2005) "Pro¬files in coping: Responses to sexual har¬assment across persons, organizations and culture”, Journal of Applied Psychol¬ogy, 90, 182-192.
  12. DeFour, D. C., David, G., Diaz, F.J. and Shaharazade, T. (2003) “The Interface of Race, Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Eth¬nicity in Understanding Sexual Harass¬ment”, in M. Paludi and C. A. Paludi (eds.) Academic and Workplace Har¬assment, London, Praeger. DiTomaso, N. (1989) "Sexuality in the Workplace: Discrimination and Harass¬ment”, in Hearn, J., Sheppard, D., Tan- cred-Sheriff, P. and Burrell, G. (eds.), The Sexuality of Organization, London, Sage. DuBrin, A. J. (1991) “Sex and gender differences in tactics of influence”, Psy¬chological Reports, 68, 635-646.
  13. EU (2005), Report on sexual harassment in the work place in EU Member States, son erişim tarihi: 19.12.2006,
  14. Fitzgerald, L. F. and Ormerod, A. J. (1991) "Perceptions of sexual harass¬ment: The influence of gender and con-text”, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 281-294.
  15. Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J. and Drasgow, F. (1995), “Measuring Sexual Harassment: Theoretical and Psycho¬metric Advances", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 425-427.
  16. Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., Ormerod, M. and