Journals / Maliye ve Finans Yazıları / 2018 / Sayı: 110

A Comparative Analysis Of Socially Responsible Investing For Borsa Istanbul Stock Market

Pages
199–216
Publication Date
2018-11-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that there is a positive relation between social responsibility and financial performance for companies in BIST.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the stock market performance and accounting performance of Participation 30 Index (KATLM), Corporate Governance Index (XKURY) and Sustainability Index (XUSRD), all of which are calculated by Borsa Istanbul (BIST) stock market.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design/methodology/approach – The risk-adjusted performance measures, Sharpe Ratio, Treynor Measure, Jensen Measure, Information Ratio, M2 Performance Measure and T2 Performance Measure were used in this article to calculate the stock market performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that there is a positive relation between social responsibility and financial performance for companies in BIST.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Corporate Social Responsibility · Islamic Finance

Özet

The purpose of this study is to examine the stock market performance and accounting performance of Participation 30 Index (KATLM), Corporate Governance Index (XKURY) and Sustainability Index (XUSRD), all of which are calculated by Borsa Istanbul (BIST) stock market. The companies in these indexes are approved as companies making socially-responsible investments. Design/methodology/approach – The risk-adjusted performance measures, Sharpe Ratio, Treynor Measure, Jensen Measure, Information Ratio, M2 Performance Measure and T2 Performance Measure were used in this article to calculate the stock market performance. The return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) were used as accounting based performance measures. The results show that there is a positive relation between social responsibility and financial performance for companies in BIST. Research limitations/implications - BIST Sustainability Index has started to be computed as of November 2014, and it is one of the limitations of this study. Practical implications – First, the shortage of investment alternatives of companies covered within the context ethical finance is not a disadvantage for them. Second, Islamic Finance, which can be investigated within the context of ethical finance, has become popular in recent years in Turkey. KATLM Index, which is consisted of stocks of the companies operating compatible with the principles of participation banking, is an alternative for risk averse investors. Originality/value - Turkish stock market is an emerging financial market. The findings of this study has implications for local and international investors for designing trading strategies, drawing investment decisions and risk management.

🔖

Cite This Article

ECE, N. (2018). A Comparative Analysis Of Socially Responsible Investing For Borsa Istanbul Stock Market. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, Sayı: 110, 199–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/228907

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. REFERENCESABBOTT, W. F., and MONSEN, R. J. (1979), “On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-report disclosure as a method of measuring social involvement”, Academy of Management Journal, 22, pp. 501-515.ALPASLAN A., and AYGÜN M. (2013), “Kurumsal Sorumluluk ve Firma Performansı”, Süleyman Demirel University, The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Vol.18 No. 1, pp. 435-448.ALEXANDER, G. J., and BUCHHOLZ, R. A. (1978), “Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 479-486.ATEŞOĞLU İ., and TÜRKER A. (2010), “Konaklama İşletmelerinin Sosyal Sorumluluk Faaliyetlerine Yaklaşımı:Muğla İli Örneği”, Süleyman Demirel University, The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 207-226.BAŞAR B. (2014), “Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Raporlaması ve Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişki:Borsa İstanbul’da İşlem Gören Kimya Petrol Plastik Sektörü Şirketleri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma”, Celal Bayar University İİBF, Vol. 21 No. 2.BAŞAR B., and BAŞAR M. (2006), “Sosyal Sorumluluk Raporlaması ve Türkiye’deki Durumu”, Anadolu University, Journal of Social Sciences, pp. 213-230.BERMAN SL, Wicks AC, KOTHA S, JONES TM. (1999), “Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and the firm financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 488-506.BODİE Z., Kane, A., MARCUS, A.J. (2005), "Investments", McGraw-Hill.BOWMAN, E. H., and HAIRE, M (1975), “A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility”, California Management Review, Vol.18 No. 2, pp. 49-58.BRAGDON, J. H., and MARLIN, J. A. T. (1972), “Is pollution profitable?”, Risk Management, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 9-18.ÇELIK İ., DINÇER H., YILMAZ R. (2012), “İMKB’de İşlem Gören Bankaların Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Çalışmalarının Finansal Sonuçları Üzerinde Kurumsal Yönetim İlkeleri Çerçevesinde Bir İnceleme”, Beykent University, Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 37-63. ÇITAK L., and ERSOY E. (2016), “Firmaların BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksine Alınmasına Yatırımcı Tepkisi: Olay Çalışması Ve Ortalama Testleri İle Bir Analiz”, International Journal of Alanya Faculty of Business, Vol. 8 No.1, pp. 43-57.CINGÖZ A., and AKDOĞAN A. (2012), “İşletmelerin Kurumsal Sorumluluk Faaliyetleri”, Atatürk University Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.16 No. 3, pp. 331-349.COFFEY BS, FRYXELL GE. (1991), “Institutional Ownership of S